So me and my friend have decided we want to make a claude ai agent targeted at small businesses and individuals. I would appreciate it if someone can give their honest opinion on it :) (its called arca) and we even made a website called arcaops.xyz heres a rough idea on the business model:

An AI agent for small teams that watches Slack, Notion, and Google Calendar, and handles the busywork between those tools — acting on its own when it's confident, and asking a human when it's not. The pitch is explicitly "no silent automation, no surprises."

Target user: small business owners / small teams (validated at networking events in Zürich — the deck cites owners saying yes because status updates, scheduling, and follow-ups eat hours a week and they can't justify hiring for it).

The core mechanic — this is the actual product, not the integrations

1. Arca watches events across the connected tools (new Slack message, Notion status change, calendar change).
2. It scores its own confidence about the right action.
3. High confidence → acts automatically (drafts a reply, updates a status, files a card).
4. Low confidence / high stakes → surfaces to the human first, showing its reasoning, before doing anything.

That confidence-gated trust layer is the differentiator — a plain Zapier-style integration wouldn't have it.

When I first started using AI seriously, I wasted a surprising amount of time jumping between prompt lists, tutorials, bookmarks, random documents and tools.

The information wasn't really the problem.

The problem was turning all of it into something I could actually use when I had work to do.

So I started building my own small library of structured guides.

What began as a few personal notes eventually grew into 20 practical PDF playbooks for tasks such as:

• researching competitors and markets
• writing SEO content
• creating landing page copy
• planning email campaigns
• building lead magnets
• writing YouTube scripts
• repurposing existing content
• organizing AI research
• improving productivity
• creating repeatable AI workflows
• planning affiliate and marketing campaigns

I wanted each guide to answer one simple question:

“I need to do this task — what should I actually do next?”

I finally put the whole project together here:

https://digitalworldpulse.com/ai-productivity-and-marketing-toolkit/

It's still very much a work in progress, so I'd love feedback from people who build and use this kind of stuff.

What topic would make the collection more useful to you?

Disclosure: Digital World Pulse is my own project. The complete toolkit uses a sponsor-unlock page, and I may receive compensation if an eligible sponsor offer is completed.

That’s what we’re building with [**WorldDigital.ai**](http://worlddigital.ai/).
[WorldDigital.ai](http://worlddigital.ai/) is an AI-powered digital marketing platform designed for SMEs and SMBs that want to automate their marketing without the cost of a traditional agency.
From campaign management and AI-powered content to SEO, analytics, and advertising automation across platforms like Google, Meta, and Snapchat — everything is managed from one dashboard.
We’ve been building and testing the platform for years, and we’re now looking to connect with business owners who want to try it, give us honest feedback, and help shape the next stage.
If you’re an SME/SMB owner, marketer, or entrepreneur, I’d love to hear your thoughts.
What would you want an AI marketing platform to automate for your business?
\#AI #WorldDigitalAI #digitalmarketing #businessowner #fyp

Quick context for anyone new to this: AI OFM means running an AI-generated model on a subscription platform. Fanvue is the OnlyFans alternative that allows AI models. OnlyFans requires creators to personally appear in content, so AI personas get banned there.

I've been running one since early spring. Best month so far was a bit over $8k, lifetime is around $25k. Here's the whole system, condensed. Nothing to buy at the end, the long version is free.

1. Character. One face that stays identical in every image. That's the whole technical problem. If she drifts between photos, the fan who notices is the fan who stops paying. Also give her an actual life, a job, a city, things she would never say. You'll be writing in her voice for months.

2. Traffic. It's Instagram, and it's a numbers game with rules. New account posts like a person for a week or two before any link exists. The link goes to a safe landing page (I use getallmylinks), never straight to Fanvue, the direct link is what gets accounts flagged. Content is reels, not photos, because photos only reach people who already follow you. Photos also work once you have audience to monetize.

3. Fanvue setup. Yes there's ID verification, and it's yours, not hers, you're the operator. That question stalls people for weeks and there's nothing to stall on. Price the sub low, it's the door not the business. Build a simple PPV catalogue before launch so nothing is generated while a fan waits.

4. Where the money actually is. On my page roughly two thirds of revenue comes from chat messages. Subscriptions are about a seventh. Almost everyone builds this backwards, months on the images and ten minutes on the conversation, and then wonders why the page is dead.

5. Chat. Run it manually for a few weeks before you automate anything. You need to know what your fans respond to before any tool can help. The tool is the last problem to solve, fix traffic first.

I also cut the whole thing into a 4 minute video with the real dashboard on screen: https://youtu.be/0jtzyGJbnq8?si=XYq1SOHI_3sl-Pt4

Written version with the prompts and numbers, free here: https://fanwake.app/guide?utm_source=reddit&utm_campaign=guide-video-post

Happy to answer questions in the comments.

Executives don't lack tools.

They lack a ruler.

 

That's the actual claim Ed Zitron made — not "AI is bad," but that the people signing off on AI-assisted work were never equipped to check it in the first place.

They see a document that looks finished and call it done, because "finished-looking" is the only bar they've ever had to clear.

 

For anyone whose whole job is catching the thing that looks fine and isn't — this isn't a tech story.

It's a story about who gets trusted, and why it's rarely the person who's actually right.

 

I've been on the other side of that exact gap.

Long before spreadsheets and dashboards, mine had a tape measure in it.

 

I was working as a Site Engineer for a Singaporean construction company building a primary school in Chua Chu Kang district back in 1998. Time flies. Just graduated from university. Figure I get some site experience first.

One day, I came to the project site. And I saw the newly delivered precast half-flight staircase lying on the ground next the building. I asked around to find out why wasn't it crane-lifted to position, which is between 1st and 2nd floor. And I was told the measurements were off. They couldn't fit it nicely on place.

And so, I went to work. I took my measuring tape, measure the staircase, and recorded the lengths, widths and whatnot. Then I went up to the building's 2nd floor — where the staircase was supposed to fit and meet. And I swung my measuring tape across the length of space between the positions where the 1st and last step of the staircase supposed to sit on. And took the site measurements too.

Then I went back to my office, took out the construction drawings from the drawing rack, lay it on the meeting table. And with a piece of paper, I started drawing it out. I knew full well the measurements I got will not exactly match that in the drawings, because — you know — site tolerances are still allowed and anticipated in the BS Code of Practice.

And then, through calculations, I found it. The measurements were way out of tolerance limit. No wonder the staircase can't fit. The blame squarely landed on our RC works sub-contractor. They screw up the levelling of the building.

Each of us supposed to have an "internal ruler" we rely on, to judge whether things look good or bad. For me, back then, it was Pythagoras and a fresh sheet of paper. My boss, years later, called his the same thing in different words — his "feel," thirty years deep. Kevin O'Leary's is knowing he can smell bullshit from a mile away.

So, coming back to these leadership people that Ed Zitron was attacking: don't they have their "feel" of things before shit hits the fan? Don't they use their "internal ruler" to measure it for themselves? Can't they smell bullshit from a mile away?

https://preview.redd.it/1j7kqeub7yjh1.jpg?width=1024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7c3ef0563fe287471d2b68fbd35d2e35806943c4

________

Every post on this account keeps circling back to the same thing, whichever industry the clip's from: the people getting quietly pushed out are rarely the ones who got it wrong.

 

Drop your take: what's your internal ruler, and who around you doesn't have one?

 

Clip credit: Ed Zitron (Better Offline) on Adam Taggart's Thoughtful Money. DM for credit or removal requests.

 

If your ruler's ever been right and still overlooked, it's worth seeing what building past that actually looks like.

 

“你在帮人倒米吗？“

Lauren Tan didn't get replaced by her own tooling.

She got promoted by it — and nobody handed her that promotion.

She built the case for it herself, one lint rule and one CI gate at a time, until the argument was undeniable.

That's the part nobody's really talking about when they talk about AI and engineering jobs: the shift rewards the people who go looking for the leverage first, not the people who wait to be told it's safe to look.

 

That "build the case yourself" instinct is exactly what clicked for me watching my own son learn to run a team instead of carry it.

My son started playing 王者荣耀 (Honor of Kings) since he was a teenager — a 5v5 multiplayer battle arena game where you manage a roster of specialized heroes, growing and levelling up their strengths through battles and gear.

In his early gaming days I could hear him cursing and swearing from his room — bad coordination, worst teammates. There was a phrase we used for a bad teammate in my own career — 帮人倒米*, a Cantonese idiom that literally translates as helping someone tip over their own grain container, meaning ruining or sabotaging someone's livelihood.*

But the cursing became less and less. He got good at managing his heroes and coordinating with his team. He started climbing the leaderboard. People started noticing him and his team. Then, in college, he started getting invited to tournaments — cash prizes when he won, and one lagged-connection loss at a KL tournament he still suspects was foul play.

Time has changed — my dad would've killed me for wasting my teenage years on video games.

Now he's in university, still playing, still winning tournaments and cash prizes with his team.

Why I'm bringing this up: I always thought these AI agents are kind of like the heroes my son uses in the game. Your skill is in your managing these heros and how to grow them, level them up to serve your purpose. You don't go down to the battle yourself. You engage the heros to do it for you.

The skill is in the managing.

https://preview.redd.it/xiee128173kh1.jpg?width=1024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=638e2d62448f1e60434b937b5a21ea332501c595

__________

 

I keep walking into the same room wearing a different name on the door — the accountant's room, the analyst's room, now the engineer's.

Every time, someone's being told the machine is coming for their hours, not their name on the work.

 

Drop your take — are you already the head chef of your own stack, or are you still doing all the cooking yourself?

 

Clip credit: MTS (Monitor The Situation) — full video on their channel. DM for credit or removal requests.

 

If encoding your own judgment into the system sounds like the actual leverage skill here, the mechanism I built around exactly this is one link away.

For most of my life I tried to be someone else. I'd find someone I admired, decide they were better than me, and copy them. That mindset pushed me into a business I never enjoyed and only started because I looked up to one specific guy. It failed. I felt completely lost.

Around that time I was obsessively tracking my sleep with a Whoop, trying to optimize it. I kept getting good recovery scores. And I was still exhausted, yawning through entire afternoons, dead by 2pm. That's when it clicked: the score doesn't do anything. It just confirms you slept well or badly. Cool. Now what? Knowing isn't fixing.

So I built the thing I actually wanted. It takes the data your wearable already collects sleep, recovery, heart rate, and turns it into a daily protocol instead of another number. It tells you what supplements to take based on your metrics, predicts your most productive hours and gives you the exact time window when you should do deep focus tasks and light focus tasks, it tells you how much caffeine you have in your system left based on your first coffee taken and notifies you when you should take the next caffeinated drink for maximum productivity, it even tells you when to nap so your energy lasts the whole day instead of crashing and much more...

It's on the App Store as RizeAI https://apps.apple.com/us/app/rizeai-maximize-your-energy/id6762402079. i built by myself, it's early stage right now, and I want honest feedback, what's confusing, what's missing, what you'd never use. Tear it apart.

Hey everyone. I started a horror storytelling channel a couple weeks ago (Nightlore) — narrated true-style horror stories, original scripts, AI voice narration, disclosed as AI-generated per YouTube's requirements. I've posted several videos so far and I'm sitting at close to zero impressions across the whole channel, not just low views.

I've checked the basics: everything's set to Public, no copyright claims or restriction notices on any video, AI-disclosure toggle is set correctly on all uploads. So as far as I can tell there's nothing technically wrong on the backend, it's just... not getting shown to anyone yet.

I know cold start is real for brand new channels, but I'd genuinely appreciate outside eyes on this — is it a content/hook problem, a thumbnail problem, something about the niche, or just early days and I need to keep grinding? Honest critique welcome, I'd rather hear it now than after 20 more videos.

Here's one of the videos if anyone's willing to take a look: [ https://youtu.be/28OmRcaK728 ]

Thanks in advance.