Which table are you walking away from first: H17 with deep penetration, or S17 with a brutal cut?
Let's look at the real-world trade-offs on modern casino floors right now.
On one hand, you have the standard H17 game grabbing that extra 0.2 percent edge because the dealer is twice as likely to improve a soft 17 to a strong hand (0.8 percent increase) than they are to bust it (0.4 percent increase).
On the other hand, you find an elusive S17 table, but the surveillance or floor has mandated a brutal cut card placement, absolutely killing the deck penetration.
Assuming both tables are 3:2 payouts with identical limits, where are you putting your money? Do you take the math hit of the H17 rule for better deck depth, or do you protect the baseline house edge on the S17 table and deal with the frequent shuffles?