
Little League Today
Playoff game today!
Dragons vs Tigers!
MLK Park 5:30p!

Playoff game today!
Dragons vs Tigers!
MLK Park 5:30p!
The Newell Street Bridge will be replaced in the next year. Construction should start immediately, and is scheduled to finish in March of 2027.
This project is entirely run by the City of Palo Alto.
The new bridge will be wider, allow for more water flow, and better flood protection.
Thank you to the City of East Palo Alto Public Works team for repainting the southbound bike lanes on University Ave.
Previously, the bike lane markings faded out a few hundred feet before the pedestrian/bicycle overcrossing, creating a confusing and potentially dangerous situation for cyclists approaching the crossing.
According to SWITRS collision data, there were 39 collisions within one block of University Ave & Donohoe St between 1/1/24 and 6/30/25 — including 7 involving bicyclists and 2 involving pedestrians. All of these crashes occurred before the new University Ave pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing opened in July 2025.
The overcrossing is already bringing significantly more bike and pedestrian traffic to University Ave, and this week’s closure of the Newell Bridge for the next two years will likely increase southbound bicycle traffic even further.
Long term, the University Ave Grand Corridor Project is in the design phase and will bring more comprehensive safety improvements. In the meantime, Councilmember Dinan and I had multiple conversations with Public Works about the need for near-term safety improvements given the concerning collision history at this location.
Public works confirmed with us that there was ample road space to add a bike lane buffer since the lanes on university Ave are wider than most other streets. Narrowing the lanes slightly actually would decrease vehicle speeds and potentially discourage cut through traffic.
https://epasun.org/closing-the-gaps-to-the-university-avenue-overcrossing/
Sand Hill Property plans major East Palo Alto housing overhaul with
hundreds of new units
By Clare A. Fonstein – Reporter, Silicon Valley Business Journal
May 19, 2026
Sand Hill Property Company committed to replace all rent-stabilized units one-for-one without displacing residents.
Local developer Sand Hill Property Company is undertaking a major project in East Palo Alto, with plans to renovate existing housing and build additional townhomes and apartments.
Woodland Park Communities, an affiliate of Sand Hill Property Company, submitted pre-applications for two projects known as O’Keefe-Manhattan andWest Bayshore-Newell Improvements.
The O’Keefe-Manhattan Improvements and West Bayshore-Newell Improvements are aimed at updating and replacing buildings north of University Avenue and along West Bayshore Avenue and Newell Road.
The projects center around three main components: renovating existing apartments, creating new for-sale townhomes and developing new apartment buildings.
Throughout the Woodland Park neighborhood the existing buildings range between 50 and 100 years old, according to Michael Kramer, chief investment officer of Woodland Park Communities.
“We're eager to invest in bringing them up to a more modern standard,” he said.
For the West Bayshore-Newell improvements, Woodland Park Communities is proposing to renovate 315 units across eight apartment buildings as well as building two new apartment buildings with 253 units and 60 for- sale townhomes.
The O'Keefe Manhattan improvement project includes renovating 221 units across seven apartment buildings and building four new apartment buildings adding 392 net new mixed-income rental apartments as well as 114 new for-sale townhomes.
“Our hope is that we have a beautiful, comfortable neighborhood with highquality housing at a wide variety of affordability levels,” Kramer said.
He said the added housing will be built on vacant properties, existing parking lots or lower-density housing sites.
Woodland Park Communities has committed not to displace existing residents, saying it will guarantee residents the same rent-controlled pricing, Kramer said. All existing rent-stabilized units are planned to be replaced on a one-for-one basis.
The developer has been involved with East Palo Alto for over 10 years. “We bought these properties in early 2016 and have spent a lot of time learning about the community and understanding the desires of our residents and our neighbors,” Kramer said.
Woodland Park Communities has been hosting local meetings, listening sessions and resident discussions as the project takes shape.
Kramer said the plan is to eventually build out the project in phases.
“We'll do it slowly and deliberately over time to ensure that we can minimize the impacts to our residents and neighbors,” Kramer said.
A cost estimate for the projects was not available, but Kramer said it is planned to be funded through a standard mix of debt and equity financing. The firm is already at work on a neighboring improvement project along Euclid Avenue area of Woodland Park. The Euclid Improvements plan includes two newapartment buildings generating 550 units.
The Euclid Improvements were approved in 2024 with demolition and site work already underway. Kramer said the firm is expecting to start major construction later this year. He expects construction to take about three years to complete.
For the O’Keefe-Manhattan Improvements and West Bayshore-Newell projects, only pre-applications have been submitted so far, with formal applications anticipated to come this summer.
“It's very early on and we're still seeking feedback and input and making changes based on what the community wants,” Kramer said.
more layoffs this week from LinkedIn, Amazon, Cisco...there's probably so many more but it really sucks.
if you're navigating a lay-off or are between opportunities, come clear your head and connect with folks who are in the same boat 🤝🏼
this monday, we’re heading to San Jose for a cool contrast between the city sprawl and pristine hills.
grab your spot and see the full details here:
https://partiful.com/e/quQbeTwLMyYtlnAhlZ9I?
hope to see y'all there!
(pic of ~60 of us from last monday's hike 🙂 - and yes, we'll be splitting into groups and staggering start times so as to not overwhelm the trail)
A 15-year resident of District 4 named Brett has recently made headlines in Corona for his stance on privacy. With a long career as an IT network architect, he launched an initiative called Deflock Corona to push the City Council to end its contract with Flock Safety, a company that provides license plate reading cameras. He’s been vocal at recent council meetings, sharing his personal concern that cameras placed between his house and his daughter’s school are tracking his family's daily routines and storing that data in a corporate database. Since District 4 is up for election this year, his efforts have sparked a lot of conversation among neighbors about how much surveillance the city actually needs.
Let Rive Gauche transport you to the 1920s – 40s!
Come listen to a trio of musicians play French cafe-style music and Jazz Manouche on the accordion, violin, guitar, and bass!
This free concert will take place at the Museum of American Heritage, in the historic garden first planted in 1907 by Thomas and Dora Williams. No RSVP is required — just stop by.
We hope to see you there!
Post from the East Palo Alto Community Archive:
“Save the date, Saturday, May 23, 2026, for an important community meeting to learn about proposed changes to local housing policy that could result in fewer affordable homes being built in East Palo Alto.”
Why would we inflict harm on ourselves? As if external harm hasn’t been enough? Genuinely concerned and confused.
May 12, 2026 Council Meeting Summary
Term Limits Coming to the November Ballot
The Council voted 4–1 to place a term limits measure before voters in November 2026. Under the proposal, council members would be limited to three consecutive four-year terms, with any partial term of more than two years counting as a full term. Councilmember Romero cast the lone dissenting vote, expressing concern that running the measure alongside a potential $120–125 million civic center bond creates unnecessary political risk. Mayor Lincoln and Vice Mayor Abrica were designated to write the argument in favor.
Why it matters: Voters will have a direct say in how long council members can serve, and the outcome could reshape the city's political landscape for years to come.
Commission Seats Filled
The Council appointed Christopher Kao to the Planning Commission regular seat and Isabel Lopez Ysmael to the alternate seat. Goolrukh Vakil and DeVan Taylor were appointed to two regular seats on the Rent Stabilization Board. Public Works and Transportation Commission appointments were deferred after none of the applicants appeared at the meeting on time.
Why it matters: These volunteer bodies play a meaningful role in land use, housing policy, and tenant protections — filling vacancies keeps them functional.
City Facing a $4.7 Million Budget Gap
The proposed FY 2026-27 budget carries a $4.7 million General Fund deficit, driven by uncertain state property tax backfill, slowing assessed value growth, flat hotel tax revenue, and rising personnel costs. Staff proposed covering the shortfall through one-time reserves rather than cuts. The Council flagged the possibility of raising the Transient Occupancy Tax (hotel tax) from 12% to 14%, which could generate roughly $400,000 annually.
Why it matters: The Council will need to identify structural fixes.
Police Department Near Full Strength
Chief Jeff Liu reported the department is effectively at full authorized staffing for the first time in years, with only one sworn vacancy remaining. Highlights included the promotion of two community service officers to full officers, two new detectives, a dedicated traffic enforcement officer, and an embedded mental health clinician. A department video from the Cinco de Mayo event has surpassed 350,000 views on social media.
Why it matters: After years of vacancies straining patrol capacity, the department is in a stronger position to deliver consistent public safety services.
City Hall Modernization Underway
The City Manager's Office presented a budget focused on completing ongoing projects rather than launching new ones. The biggest investment is a $1.2 million first-year draw from the five-year IT Strategic Plan, funding cybersecurity improvements, a financial software evaluation, a website overhaul, and document management systems. HR has reviewed over 350 job applications this year and is updating personnel policies that haven't been touched since the 1980s.
Why it matters: These behind-the-scenes investments are expected to significantly improve staff efficiency and service delivery over the next several years.
The East Palo Alto Police Department is providing an update regarding the ongoing investigation into the recent shooting in our community. The victim survived the incident and continues to recover. The suspects initially remained outstanding.
Flock Safety cameras in East Palo Alto identified both vehicles involved in the incident. Flock technology tracked the suspect vehicle as it left the city and traveled through Hayward, Tracy, and ultimately to Stockton. There, a San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Deputy located the vehicle and the suspect.
A handgun and methamphetamines were recovered from inside the car. The suspect, Taje Jakkar Holliman, a 35‑year‑old male, had been released from state prison to Post‑Release Community Supervision (PRCS) on April 18, 2026.
Holliman was taken into custody and booked into the San Mateo County Jail.
This remains an active investigation. While we continue working to bring this case to a full resolution, additional details cannot be released at this time.
Anyone with information related to this case is encouraged to contact the East Palo Alto Police Department.
Ravenswood School District raised $110M just four years ago with Measure I to build new campuses and renovate others. This was supposed to be a once in a generation ask.
Despite being one of the highest funded school districts in the area, outcomes have barely improved. I believe if the past is any indication of the future, Measure A will not measurably improve outcomes for this district.
Furthermore, following the closure of the Primary School, the district is already receiving $65M in funding and they are asking $70M on top of that.
Please note there are a number of teachers and members of the school board campaigning for Measure A online, who obviously have a vested interest in this passing.
Don't take my word for it:
https://epasun.org/ravenswood-school-funding-compared-to-other-local-school-districts/
Ravenswood School District receives considerably more funding per student than nearby Menlo Park and Los Lomitas School Districts.
“This literally is the worst school district I have ever come across,” said Mark Hinkle, president of the SVTA.
HInkle said that for the 2024-25 school year, 87.9% of Ravenswood students scored below grade level in English and 92.8% scored below grade level in math, according to data he cited from the Education Data Partnership.
“Why are we building new buildings for students that can’t read and can’t do math?” said Hinkle. “When you reward bad behavior, you get more bad behavior.”
Darn those pesky license plate readers and surveillance cameras! If the ACLU and the Fourth Amendment privacy fanatics had their way, the shooter may have remained free to shoot another day. After all, he only got out of jail 3 weeks ago, and was just getting started (again?).
Despite falling enrollment over decades, and continually low performance, Ravenswood School District keeps asking for more and more money.
Tax payers: even if you don't vote for Measure A, your parcel tax will already be increasing soon from $196 to $434. Furthermore, you will be paying for Measure I for another 30 or so years, since this multi-decade, "once in a generation" bond was introduced only 4 years ago.
Now, you are being persuaded to pay for another "once in a generation" bond Measure A, which will add ANOTHER 30 year tax burden. All for an estimated one time small increase in enrollment (see the yellow bars in the chart below), which may not even materialize if families, like many others, choose to avoid this underperforming district.
And most likely, if the past is any indication, you will see no return for your money other than some fancy new buildings.