r/google_antigravity

An update: we’re giving 3x of Gemini models across all paid tiers in Antigravity and resetting everyone’s Gemini usage for the week.

We understand some people hit the cap quickly and wanted to respond fast. Lots more to come and enjoy building!

So I started the IDE today that I had reinstalled yesterday due to Google botching the rollout of Antigravity 2.0, and it asked me to restart for the update to apply.
And what do you know, it's gone now! Uninstalled itself without warning and now even the Agent-only Antigravity is gone too.
How can Google take so many L's in a row?

Anyone else going through the same situation?

OK. It was painful upgrading to 2.0. Now that it is all working I have to say I'm impressed with 3.5 and the new Agent Manager works hand-in-hand with the IDE and CLI components.

I'm building an Enterprise Architecture management application that leverages a graph database and a modern web frontend. The architecture of the application was predominately planned with the Anthropic models and implemented using Gemini 3.

I asked 3.5 Flash through the Agent Manager for an assessment and it offered up and implemented some significant improvements. The Agent Manager was spinning up sub-agents and parallel processes to get its work done. It was incredibly efficient and fast with its work. I would say it is easily on par with the Sonnet and Opus 4.6 models.

Though a rough start I've ended up very happy with this latest upgrade. I also appreciate the 3x extra tokens.

I was using the Gemini CLI extensively before the upgrade. It would route to different models depending on the complexity of the task. This saved a ton on token usage. I'l be testing it and the IDE more this week.

Has anyone discovered how to disable the automatic file edits and require approval first? it seems like there is no way as long as I can tell, there's nothing about it in the /config. I can't even make it to show the edits, it just says they are done and I check it on the IDE

I know this will not be popular.. But wanted to share incase others are in the same situation.

When the upgrade happened it broke my AG and IDE.. I originally deleted everything and installed the IDE... (after lots of grumbling)... but after watching IO I decided to give it a go as the Google engineers intended.

I went back and clean installed the standard AG 2.0 and rebuilt 5 very simple web apps I had made from scratch without the IDE.. I even decided to just let it make it's own updates (crazy I know)

And as a novice the experience was significantly easier and faster than the old IDE way with a much better outcome, the apps look much better and I found they didn't get constantly broken with upgrades.

My only gripe was running out of AI time which they just address with the 3x upgrade.

Anyhoo, if you are a novice working on simple stuff I'd say give it a crack, you might like it 😄

the look and feel of the agy cli usage is same as claude code. I guess that is why the code is closed source now - because they cant show that to the world that they copied a competitor's code

I honestly don’t know what happened, but I’m extremely frustrated right now.

I tried the new version of Antigravity on my Mac, and after some failed tasks/issues, everything started going downhill. Chrome became insanely slow, tabs freezing, random blocking issues, and now my entire main Chrome profile feels corrupted or unusable.

The worst part is that this is my daily-use browser profile with all my work stuff inside. I wasn’t testing on some empty profile.

What makes me even more angry is how long Antigravity takes to fix basic issues. Something fails, then you spend forever trying random workarounds while the app keeps acting unstable.

At this point I seriously regret updating/testing it.

Has anyone else experienced:

Chrome freezing or becoming unusable?

Profile corruption/issues on Mac?

Heavy CPU/RAM usage after Antigravity runs?

Failed tasks causing browser instability?

Would really appreciate any real fixes because right now this has been a complete nightmare.

As you may know, in this subreddit it is forbidden to complain from the obvious, so I'm restricted in using some words, otherwise my post will get instantly deleted.

Google talks about how fast the new Flash 3.5 model is. And it is really fast and good, definitely the best model they ever made.
But we never complained from their models being slow, right? As long as the old models worked (and not being constantly bombarded with errors), they were fast enough too. Gemini-cli was an exception, which during peak hours might take you HOURS to respond, but Antigravity didn't have this issue.

I'd rather get 3x slower model, but the same usage as the old models used to have. I don't mind browsing around till my code is being prepared or even review the old changes before the new ones are finished, as it takes me much more time to review the code and to prepare the new prompt, than for the LLM to generate that code.

I lost hope in Google and doubt that they'd listen to us, as they never did.

The old Flash was genuinely generous and people who did iterative small tasks like UI tweaks boilerplate generation or quick coding loops basically lived on it. Now we are hitting walls mid session and that is a real productivity hit

My opinion on this is that its a calculated move by Google to funnel everyone onto the new model and collect real world usage data for fine tuning. Makes sense for them. Does not make it less annoying for us who had workflows built around the old Flash

Well I do not think this is permanent. Once they squeeze out enough data to properly tune 3.5 Flash the access will probably open up again. At least that is the hopeful take. Whether Google actually follows through is a different question

I've spent the last 5 years working on dev projects in different capacities and made a shift from VSCode to Ag.

But I mean wtf has happened. It seems Google wants kids around the world to access and f**k up their parents computers (for the 5 minutes the flash 3.5 tokens last) and then go back to using deep seek???

This "upgrade" has certainly made me frustrated enough to post this. Anyone else feeling this?

https://preview.redd.it/3n0reue4gd2h1.jpg?width=1609&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=440bad13588489f7e6aba5d66b81e724eb9eb16b

With the new adjustments, I can no longer work on Antigravity. The new Flash model works well, but it completely burns through all my bar in half an hour, and then they only recharge after 6 days. The other models are pretty much the same, which means I’d be paying for the Pro plan just to use it maybe four times a month for at most two hours total across all models. That’s no longer viable for me.

I’ll proceed with canceling the subscription plan. Do you recommend any alternatives with a similar cost that would allow me to continue building and refining applications?

Best regards.

I have a Gemini Pro subscription, and I've been using Antigravity for a few months now. It used to be good.

Opus 4.6 burned qota slightly faster than 3.1 Pro, but it was still in a reasonable rate.

With recent update, we got the 3.5 Flash model but they removed the 3.1 flash which never ran out of limt, ever.

Not only that, but with latest update, Opus 4.6 has become completely useless.

Create an implementation plan from prompt - 40% used.

Created 3 small files(each with less than 100 Loc) out of 6 - 60% used.
Remaining 3 files - 400 AI crdts already used and not yet finished.

Antigravity app was open in my pc since yesterday and the update couldn't finish because of that. I noticed on Twitter that the new Antigravity UI is something like Codex and is trash. Luckily, I'm still in the V1, until I close it.

Also I received a mail from Google that they will no longer give the 1000 credts they used to give every month.

Update

The remaining 3 files ate up 924 credts.

20 minutes, Opus 4.6 went from 100% -> 0%, credts went from 1000 -> 76

Now with 3.5 Flash Model is Limited too most, i recently use Codex Desktop with more subcription