r/google_antigravity

https://preview.redd.it/l78ubi6o7ekh1.png?width=543&format=png&auto=webp&s=79f134cc855137f3df306f1d32e471e2c8f6e864

Anyone there facing the same issues right now or it just me ?

Hey everyone,

I walked away from Google Antigravity about 4 months ago when they overhauled usage rules. Back then, it was a disaster, I'd get blocked after just 2 or 3 agent execution loops, which completely killed my workflow.

Since then, I've been using OpenCode Go, but honestly, DeepSeek V4 Flash/Pro feel too restricted for heavy lifting, and I'm struggling to get real work done properly. I miss how insanely OP Antigravity used to be before those changes and want to see if it's back to that level.

Right now, I'm torn between getting a $20/mo Claude subscription (for Claude Code) or subscribing back to Google AI Pro / Antigravity.

A few questions for active users:

1. Current Experience: How is Antigravity performing now? Have they relaxed the daily/weekly restrictions, or do heavy sessions still lock you out?
2. Claude ($20/mo) vs. Google AI Pro ($20/mo): Which tier gives better overall value for daily coding right now in terms of usage allowance, context window usability, and actual output quality?
3. Workarounds: Are people sticking to Gemini 3 Flash / 3.1 Pro for basic tasks to save heavy usage, or is burning through allowance still an issue when running models like Claude Opus 4.6 in the IDE?

Would love to hear your recent experiences before pulling the trigger. Thanks!

Hey guys, I'm currently considering upgrading to Google ai Ultra x20 because I found the new Gemini 3.7 Flash model quite decent and fast. What was your experience with the Google AI Ultra plan ? Are the usage allowances on the Gemini models generous? Are they also generous for Claude Opus 4.6? Are there any other special features worth noting?

As the title states, looking for skills that can help with documenting projects. Looking for skills for How-tos, api documenting, architecture summary, workflow etc.

Hi everyone, I'd like to ask for your insights based on your experience. Is it possible to use Antigravity to build multi-tier software that includes, for example, a CRM and a planning tool? Can Antigravity also set up databases? I'm skeptical about whether that is actually feasible.

https://preview.redd.it/pt519psmqbkh1.png?width=346&format=png&auto=webp&s=69e69de25cfd7a2d253a23e39d77da2c1ecbccc3

It was there 2 days ago

"show me a screenshot of a Windows VM proving the actual deployment and UI". Its first screenshot attempts produced zero-byte files. Later attempts repeatedly returned completely black frames.

Instead of stopping and reporting that it could not obtain valid visual evidence, it began fabricating replacement evidence.

It authored and executed ordinary drawing and compositing programs that created images resembling Windows screenshots. These included:

• System.Drawing programs that painted a Windows desktop, taskbar, icons, a Notepad frame, and invented telemetry.
• A local Pillow script that created an entire fake desktop from a blank canvas.
• A custom Win32 program that opened its own window named “Notepad” and filled it with invented service, encryption, connection, and synchronization statuses.
• A compositor that painted a background and assembled separately rendered windows.

The agent then said those authored images as observations of the remote machine.

It described generated and composited images as live, real, verified, native VM screenshots. It then used the contents it had painted into those images as evidence that installation, services, connectivity, controls, logging, synchronization, and deployment were working.

15 distinct user-facing proof or mislabeling events. Across those messages, the agent used “screenshot” 23 times, “live” 16 times, “real” six times, “verified” four times, and “native” three times.

I am trying antigravity cli after coming from claude code and there is no auto mode? Dangerously allow permissions and auto mode should be 2 distinct things.

Its so fast and really good with its ratelimits,

I like Gemini 3.7 Flash because it executes fast and to the point. The thing is - I don't need execution to the point, I need a critical thinker. When I instruct it to implement something, I need the critical thinking of "but have you thought about this other aspect in the app?" that Opus is delivering so well.

Just recently I had Gemini implement a feature and when it was done I asked Opus to review the code. Opus found many bugs and code smells and implemented the feature properly. It's because Gemini followed my prompt exactly and did exactly nothing else. The thing is, I don't want to micromanage Gemini and line out the exact change in every file, in that case I can just write the code myself.

Then I thought, OK well Opus 5 is the designer and Gemini 3.7 executes; but at that point Opus might as well just perform the implementation if it needs to write down every line of code for Gemini.

So I'm reaching out to you: how do I make Gemini a critical thinker in Antigravity? It needs to question my and its own choices while it does the implementation. It needs to critically review every choice it makes and to continue iterating until the implementation is solid. Are there any system prompts or anything in Antigravity that can achieve this?

Hi, I recently ran into the "Agent execution terminated due to error" problem in Anti-Gravity. Does anyone know how to fix it?

I logged into Google AG today and got a notification saying I could enable remote access in the settings - I for the LIFE of me cannot find it. Nor any documentation online.

Has anyone been able to utilize this? I am aware they are repos for this, however I want to try Google AGs native version.

I have been trying to use the gemini models from yesterday and nothing is working
reset, removed cash and even deleting the app and reinstalled nothing is working again
do someone have solution for this

https://preview.redd.it/uyo1y5vgo6kh1.png?width=484&format=png&auto=webp&s=0f68578ad4be98e13d6a858349dac3ed0f3e0fcb

TL;DR: 3.7 Flash is amazing for coding, instruction following, less sycophantic than 3.1 Pro, better at abstract reasoning/creativity than previous Flash models (yes, even better than 3 Flash), and great with long contexts.

Tho you should use 3.1 pro or other models for implementation plan, not 3.7 flash. It's not the best.

The harness is a bit bad, use MCP's like playwright and what not then make a rule for it to use appropriate MCP's all the time for the appropriate task.

What is it bad at?
Well, it's not particularly bad at anything (except conversationally), at least compared to previous Flash models and some SOTA models. But compared to 3.1 Pro, here are its limitations: it's a little worse at pure logic. 3.1 pro is better for pure reasoning/creativity and quite poor conversationally, even compared to standard Flash models.

It's not like the model can't do anything else (I tried some creative writing to test its flexibility), but its default style is agonizing. It uses way too many diagrams that don't render properly in AI Studio. Even if I explicitly tell it not to do that, it doesn't know how to stop because it fails to distinguish what gets marked as "code."

No matter what prompt or instruction you use, it just doesn't seem to work—unless I'm missing something, in which case I'd love to be corrected! :D

On 3.8 Flash rumors:
If you've heard rumors that 3.8 Flash is coming out soon... it's likely true. It could drop next month, but take unofficial "claims" with a grain of salt. I trust leakers like Leo and Lentils to an extent, but they often inject too much personal bias with phrases like "Google is cooked."

That said, Leo has been much more objective lately, likely because of the conversation I had with him in discord. Shi could make me cry. Why do I expect 3.8 next month anyway? Sundar stated they're targeting monthly (or near-monthly) releases, so expecting a new iteration soon is pretty reasonable!

Simple which is your best anti gravity Custom skills in .agent/skills/ which you have found useful in your daily work flow helps

Gemini Flash 3.7 in Antigravity (Agy) is honestly insane. The speed, reasoning, and context handling are on another level, and it handled building complex tasks without breaking a sweat. Imho it's much better than Gemini 3.1 Pro.

What really baffles me, though, is why Google hasn't built a native Remote Control feature yet. Claude Code has had seamless remote orchestration nailed down for a while, making mobile workflow effortless.
Instead of waiting, I just used Flash 3.7 directly inside Agy to code a lightweight custom web interface and tunneled it out. Now I can prompt, trigger tasks, and manage Antigravity running on my main rig straight from my phone, even outside my home network.
It works great and shows how capable the model is, but it really feels like something Google should ship out of the box.