
r/menrights

Are we talking enough about husbands who become victims of violent crimes?
This isn't about men vs women. It's about whether we apply the same moral standards to every victim, regardless of gender.
The issue isn't just the cr!me. It's the public reaction. Celebrating or joking about an acid att@ck because the victim is a man reflects a serious empathy gap. Condemn viol€nc€ consistently, regardless of who the victim is. Equal justice and equal compassion should never depend on gender.
Feminism Was Created to Justify Misandry, You can't convince me.
​
History isn't just written by the winners; it is written by the people who control the vocabulary of victimhood. Over the last several decades, what started as a necessary push for basic legal rights has turned into something completely different. It has become a giant, organized system that works to normalize misandry (the hatred or deep dislike of men). By inventing complicated academic theories, feminism has pulled off a massive trick: it has taken raw, anti-male anger and packaged it as a fight for social justice. When you look past the smooth slogans, it becomes clear that the modern structure of feminism wasn't built to make things equal. Instead, it was designed to give people a permanent, socially acceptable excuse to blame and distrust men.
To see how this works, you only have to look at the movement's absolute favorite word: the patriarchy. In everyday conversation, people use this term to blame men for basically every problem in human history. Whether the issue is war, poverty, high beauty standards, or mental health struggles, the answer is always the same: it’s the patriarchy's fault. The clever thing about this idea is that it is completely unfalsifiable—meaning it can never be proven wrong. Because feminism defines the patriarchy as a massive system created and run entirely by men, it means men are always the bad guys by default. This lets people turn their personal anger at men into a grand mission to save the world. Instead of admitting they are perpetuating a deep prejudice against men, they just say they are "fighting the system."
This habit of blaming an entire demographic group is a double standard that only feminism gets away with. In any other situation, blaming a whole group of people for the bad actions of a few individuals is recognized as bigotry. Yet, the most famous feminist books do this constantly. Well-known radical writers like Andrea Dworkin and Catharine MacKinnon wrote that normal relationships between men and women are naturally predatory and abusive. Another famous author, Marilyn French, openly wrote that all men are essentially rapists through their laws and codes. There were even extreme essays, like one by Sally Miller Gearhart, that argued the male population should be cut down to just ten percent of the world to ensure peace. Instead of being rejected, these ideas are still taught in university gender studies departments. When a movement's main thinkers are allowed to paint an entire sex as evil, it stops being about equality and becomes an excuse for hatred.
This intellectual pathologizing of men is not just a Western problem; it has heavily infected global literature and cultural stories, including those in India. A prime example is Shashi Deshpande’s famous novel *The Dark Holds No Terrors*. While literary critics praise the book as a deep look at female trauma and marital problems, the story structurally serves to validate a deeply anti-male worldview. By painting the husband, Manohar, as a vicious, brutal abuser who mistreats his wife purely because she earns more money, the story reinforces a sweeping generalization: that male identity is naturally threatened by female success, and that the male ego always expresses itself through cruelty. When popular books constantly frame men as a baseline threat and women as eternal victims, it conditions society to view men through a lens of permanent suspicion.
To keep this narrative going, the feminist movement has to actively ignore or manipulate real facts. Media and culture constantly tell us that violence only goes one way: men hurting women. But global objective data tells a completely different story. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and global homicide data, men actually make up the overwhelming majority—roughly 80%—of violent crime and murder victims worldwide. Furthermore, comprehensive sociological studies on domestic abuse show that men are abused, controlled, and forced into unwanted sexual situations at rates that closely rival women. Even in India, while government agencies like the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) heavily document crimes against women, independent surveys show that millions of men suffer from domestic violence, yet they have zero institutional support or shelters.
Instead of helping all humans equally, feminist lobbying has spent decades ensuring that the legal system itself is transformed into a weapon against men. Legal rules like the Duluth Model used by police operate on the rigid, unscientific assumption that the man is always the primary aggressor in any domestic fight. This systemic bias has resulted in heavily one-sided laws. In India, the extreme misuse of Section 498A (the dowry harassment law) has been so widespread that even the Supreme Court of India openly called it "legal terrorism." Court statistics show an alarming reality: a massive percentage of dowry and rape cases filed under these biased legal frameworks are eventually found by judges to be entirely false. They are regularly used during angry divorces or child custody battles as tools of pure revenge, anger, or financial extortion. Because our modern culture demands we "believe all women" without any proof, a man's life, career, and reputation can be instantly destroyed before he even gets a fair trial.
In the end, this whole system survives because it has built a perfect double standard that grants its followers total moral immunity. If a man is successful, people say it’s just because of his unearned "male privilege." If a woman is successful, she is praised for her strength and resilience. If a man cheats or acts badly, he is called a symptom of toxic masculinity. But if a woman does the exact same thing, cultural commentators find a way to excuse her, claiming she was just lonely, emotionally neglected, or trying to "find herself." If anyone tries to point out how unfair this is, they are immediately silenced. If a man complains, he is called a sexist. If a woman complains, she is patronizingly told she has "internalized misogyny" and has been brainwashed by men. By making it impossible to criticize the movement, feminism has pulled off a massive trick: it has made the act of perpetuating misandry look like a virtue.
Male victims deserve the same empathy too.
Accountability matters, regardless of who's behind the screen
A dentist was suspended after allegedly posting insensitive remarks about Ketan Agarwal's de@th. Regardless of anyone's views, mocking the de@th of a victim is unacceptable. If we believe in equal dignity, then male victims deserve the same empathy and respect as anyone else. This isn't about men vs. women. It's about applying the same moral standard to everyone.
Another Reminder That Taking Advantage of Working Men Has Become a Trend
This isn't about men vs. women. It's about fairness and accountability. No one should be able to use a service, reach their destination, and refuse to pay. When the victim is a male driver, these incidents are often brushed aside. Honest workers deserve protection, regardless of gender.
He didn't know her. He didn't owe her anything. He simply chose to save her. That's real heroism.
An Indian construction worker, Vipin Kumar, is being celebrated as a hero in Romania.
When a 5-year-old girl fell through the ice of a frozen lake in Craiova, Vipin didn't hesitate. He jumped into the freezing water and held the child above the icy surface for nearly 30 minutes, enduring severe hypothermia himself until rescue teams arrived.
For his extraordinary bravery and selfless sacrifice, Romanian authorities awarded him honorary Romanian citizenship.
Stories like these deserve far more attention. Men across the world quietly risk their lives every day to protect others, often with little recognition. Today, let's take a moment to acknowledge one of them.
Respect to Vipin Kumar. A true hero.
Got bullied, disrespected and hurt by feminist friends last night
I had made a post about it in feminism sub reddit but I was faced with a lots of toxicity and hate towards me( as a men).
I recently lost my dog and was really hurt by what happened yesterday, to a point I had to call my therapist midnight and cry asking her what have I done to deserve to listen to that kind of hurtful things just for being a men. I always respect women and treat them with dignity and love.
I was the same with that group of friends and we had a lots of mutual respect but suddenly they treated me like I’m some trash and disrespected me just for being male. They even forgot that I’m suicidal because of loosing boss dog ( Leo, he was my only friend, everything I had), it felt like they simply didn’t even cared about it and needed a punching bag being me.
Now I’m having a hard time believing in that kind of “feminist activism” that is purely based on misandry, hate and resentment.
No one in that sub answered to the logical questions I asked and just bashed me again.
I will continue to love and respect women forever because they do deserve it. But I don’t think I can be around feminism space again.
I’m sorry for kind of venting out, it’s been really messing up with my head lately.
Another thing I’ve noticed is people often say hurtful things like that behind the keyboard but completely change their demeanour in person.
No one has ever been that disrespectful and hurtful towards me in person.
What do you guys think about it?
Edit: I realise that I’ve made a mistake and deleted that post. Thankyou everyone for letting me know and just being here for me, you guys are the best.
Random woman stops man at his apartment, questions his flat number and who he's with.
If a male CTO had hit a woman with a slipper, he’d be in jail already. But when she does it? Just a suspension.
A female Chief Ticket Inspector named K. Jyothi at Chittoor railway station completely lost it over some argument at the ticket counter. Instead of doing her job like a professional, she took off her slipper and started hitting a passenger with it. The passenger who sounds like he kept his cool and didn’t hit back just pulled out his phone and recorded the whole thing, while other people around also filmed her meltdown. This railway lady from Guntakal Division thought she could assault someone in public and get away with it, but the video went viral. Authorities had no choice but to suspend her. Classic case of someone in power thinking the rules don’t apply when they’re the ones throwing tantrums.
Can justice exist without equal standards?
This isn't about men vs women.
A court's judgment should always be open to public scrutiny. If we can question laws, governments, and policies, we should also be able to question judicial reasoning.
The concern here isn't that a woman received alimony. The concern is whether legal principles are being applied fairly and proportionately. After more than three decades of separation, increasing a one-time settlement from ₹10 lakh to ₹40 lakh raises legitimate questions about consistency, proportionality, and the limits of financial liability.
Supporting men's rights doesn't mean opposing women's rights. It means asking whether the justice system treats both parties with equal consideration.
Justice should never depend on gender. It should depend on fairness.
Live-In GF + BF Team Up To Slaughter Family. But "All Men Are Dangerous" Right?
When a victim's death is cheered because he's a man, don't call it equality. Call it what it is: dehumanization.
Ketan Agarwal, a 25-year-old businessman from Pune, was allegedly murdered at Lohagad Fort by his fiancée, Siya Goyal, and her alleged lover, Chetan Chaudhary, according to police investigators. While the case has horrified many, some people on social media are openly celebrating his death and claiming he "deserved it" because it was an arranged marriage.
One X user even wrote that Ketan "deserved it" and that every arranged marriage should have the same conclusion. Imagine the reaction if a woman had been murdered and people were posting similar comments about her.
A victim is a victim. Celebrating someone's death because of their gender is not justice. It's hatred.
Wife beating husband is "Devi ka Prasad"
How can we evolve as a society with such mindset in judiciary ?
Most civilized countries recognize domestic violence regardless of gender, but Indian law only recognizes DV against females. We don't even capture data on DV on males.
How can a man who is physically and mentally abused by wife be forced to live with her ?
How can we force parliament to enforce gender neutral laws ?