u/CynicalNeuron

A 62-year-old retired teacher in Karnataka’s Vijayapura district was allegedly m*rder#d by his younger daughter, her lover, and another man. The motive, according to police, was a long-standing property dispute and the father’s strong opposition to her relat!onship with an auto driver.

On the night of August 15, after an argument over property, the daughter called her lover. He arrived with a friend, str*ngled the father, and then sm#sh*d his head with a large stone. The b0dy was dump€d by the roadside.

Two of the a¢cused have been arr€sted. The third is still absc0nding. Police say the property and the forbidden relations*ip were the main reasons behind the killing.

source

This is not the brutality of the Taliban or ISIS; this happened in Bihar. Santosh Singh allegedly questioned ambedkaarrs roles in independence, after which he was assaulted and paraded around half-naked. If this is not harassment, oppression, brutality and injustice, then what is?

src

src

src

A situation like this makes you wonder how much trust can actually survive in a relationship when suspicion starts replacing honesty.

According to reports, a woman employee was at a Lucknow hotel with an Executive Engineer, after her husband became suspicious and alerted the police. Reports say the husband had been told she was going out for official work, and the incident was later caught on video and went viral.

The circumstances have sparked allegations of an affair, although the engineer has denied any wrongdoing and claimed the meeting was related to official work. An inquiry has reportedly been initiated to establish what actually happened.

Whatever the truth turns out to be, one thing remains disturbing: when a spouse starts feeling the need to verify where their partner really is, the trust in that relationship has already taken a serious hit. How is a marriage supposed to survive when honesty and trust disappear?

From what has been shared, Prachi was dating Hitansh despite reportedly being interested in Rohit, who was already in another relationship.

After Rohit became single, Prachi allegedly got together with him and Hitansh was left hurt. Later, mutual friends reportedly showed Hitansh, intimate material( not Ñu*€$) involving Prachi and Rohit, which he then sent to Rohit's father as proof of their relationship.

Whatever your opinion about Hitansh's decision, it doesn't justify what happens in this video. Exposing an affair can be criticised, but deliberately attacking someone, especially in such a vulnerable(groin )area, is still violence.She is seen repeatedly ∆tta©king him in the gr0in while shrieking at him to 0pen his l€gs. Why does the conversation suddenly change when the vict!m is a man?

Here's the whole story

सोर्स

Kerala: He quit the Merchant Navy, supported her studies and married her last year. She reportedly eloped with a bus cleaner she met on her daily commute. CCTV captured the moment everything changed.

source

This one is worth discussing. The wife had waived her maintenance claim as part of a mutual divorce settlement. The Kerala HC has now said that the waiver may not be the end of the matter if circumstances later change and she is unable to support herself.

I can understand the argument for helping someone who genuinely ends up in financial hardship. But it also raises a bigger question: if both people voluntarily agree to a settlement, sign it and move on, how final is that agreement supposed to be?

Where should the law draw the line between protecting someone from genuine hardship and giving both sides certainty after divorce?

source

Why do more women get ¢ancer in India, but more men d!e from it?

This isn't about women vs men. It's about a health gap that probably deserves a lot more attention.

Women account for slightly more than half of new can¢er cases in India. Breast and cervical can¢ers alone make up a significant share of female cases, and regular reproductive health visits and screening can help detect many of these cancers earlier.

For men, the picture is different. Oral, lung and prostate can¢ers are among the most common. Toba¢co is a major contributor, particularly to oral and lung can¢ers, and these can¢ers can be aggressive and harder to treat when detected late.

But there's another factor we don't talk about enough.

A lot of men simply don't go to the doctor until something is seriously wrong.

Ignoring a persistent symptom, putting work or family before your own health, avoiding check-ups, or telling yourself "it's probably nothing" can turn something treatable into something much more difficult.

In 2024, India was estimated to have around 1.56 million new ¢ancer cases and 874,000 ¢ancer-related deaths. Around 11 out of every 100 Indians are estimated to face a lifetime risk of developing ¢ancer.

Those aren't just statistics. They're people, families and lives.

Can¢er awareness shouldn't be a women-only conversation. Men need to take their health seriously too.

Get checked. Know the warning signs. Don't ignore something that doesn't feel right. And if you use tobacco, quitting may be one of the most important things you can do for your long-term health.

Taking care of your health isn't weakness. Waiting until it's too late is the real risk.

This is an important observation from the Supreme Court. The Court has said that if a husband can make a prima facie case that his wife is living in an adulterous relationship, interim maintenance under Section 125 can be denied instead of automatically being granted.

This doesn't mean every allegation will be accepted. It simply reinforces that courts should consider credible evidence from both sides before passing interim orders.

For years, many have argued that men's concerns are often dismissed in family disputes. Decisions like this are a reminder that justice should be based on facts, evidence, and equal standards, not assumptions based on gender. That's what true equality looks like.

source

​

Floods wiped out homes in Assam. Hussain Mansuri arrived from Mumbai with supplies and is personally visiting affected families. Men who take responsibility when institutions drop the ball deserve recognition.

source

source