r/newhampshire

PSA: buyer beware True Structural Construction.

Hi NH, from across the pond.

I'm sharing a consumer beware blurb about a contractor who has recently taken residence in your great State.

Westley Hunt is a fugitive with a warrant in Ontario Canada and True Structural Construction is the most recent iteration of his construction scam. He has a lengthy record of unresolved debts in Ontario as a consequence of stolen deposits, unfinished work and unpaid wages. His prior companies named Oneway Construction or One Way Structural and Construction have extensive complaints issued against them and you can view Wes' Consumer Beware Listing on an Ontario government webpage. Additionally, if you reverse image search the photos any of these companies use as promotional material you will see they are not original. Do not engage.

Re: Oneway

https://www.bbb.org/ca/on/ottawa/profile/construction-services/oneway-construction-0117-57044/complaints

https://www.consumerbewarelist.mgs.gov.on.ca/en/CBL/businessdetail/4897df81-0a61-ed11-9562-0022483c5cdf

https://www.federalcorporation.ca/corporation/10358878 ^ Dissolution status of Oneway Construction due to non-compliance presumably of tax duties.

Re: True Structural Construction

https://corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb/CorpSearch/CorpSummary.aspx?sysvalue=1Zx2BBLR1xXtkL7_XxYlyG.f8r8_U6OpmoTO.S5zcfw- This is a copy of Westley's business registration.

There has been much misinformation on social media around the Northern Rail Trail lawsuit. Seemingly, the conflict traces back to an abutter, Caron, who was angered after the State of New Hampshire reduced the load limit on the Keniston Covered Bridge for safety (which is owned by the Town of Andover), rendering it unusable for his heavy construction vehicles. The Town of Andover did not upgrade the bridge. In 2026, Caron asserted ownership of a section of the Northern Rail Trail—a state-owned public recreational trail—and barricaded it. NH sued Caron. Both sides signed a temporary agreement, pending the outcome of the lawsuit, which required Caron to immediately remove the barriers, forbade him from impeding public access again, and imposed strict controls on his activity, while allowing him very limited use of construction vehicles on the trail, including a rail trail trestle bridge, but not the covered bridge.

So I want to make 3 points I think are pretty important to understand!

Facts:

1. Most Rail Trails in New Hampshire were built pursuant to multiple eminent domain actions

* Under NH law, in 1844 NH laid out railroad right-of-way (easements) using eminent domain and then leased to the railroad operators including the Northern Railroad Corporation. NH law was later updated, effective June 1991, so the same NH rights-of-way and properties are now owned by NH in "Fee Simple Absolute" (total, highest ownership) again with eminent domain, extinguishing any and all reversionary rights (meaning whatever clauses the 1800s era deeds might say), pursuant to RSA 228:60-a, V. https://gc.nh.gov/rsa/html/XX/228/228-60-a.htm The law also explicitly acknowledged the purpose included recreational trails.

* Most rail trails in New Hampshire were built under RSA 228:60a, including the Northern Rail Trail.

2. Caron's countersuit, if successful, would almost certainly set precedent undermining the basis of most rail trails in New Hampshire.

* There are false claims in social media that Caron got everything he wanted in the temporary agreement. Not so: As of 8/5/2026, Caron has countersued NH, explicitly claiming "RSA 228:60-a is unconstitutional" and demands the Court force the State to cease using the property as a public recreational rail trail, and give Caron absolute fee simple ownership.

* If this was precedent, it's hard to imagine how public access to rail trails across New Hampshire would not be at risk.

My opinion:

3. New Hampshire rail trail fans have nothing to worry about!

* In 2002, RSA 228:60a was upheld by the NH Supreme Court in Malnati v. State. The abutters in that case had a "better" timeline than Caron, in that the railroad abandonment occurred decades before NH used eminent domain with RSA 228:60-a in the 1990s. Still, the NH Supreme Court agreed NH could never lose its 1844 easement from abandonment. Furthermore, the NH Supreme Court also agreed RSA 228:60-a gave NH fee simple absolute possession. https://www.courts.nh.gov/sites/g/files/ehbemt471/files/documents/2022-10/2002077malnati.pdf Note: The Malnatis were still entitled to just compensation for the post-abandonment taking in the 1990s.

* Caron, instead, has a massive timeline problem. Caron argues he was not properly notified of the RSA 228:60a eminent domain, voiding it. However, Caron purchased his property in June 1994, after A. RSA 228:60a was effective in June 1991, and B. After the Northern Rail Trail filed for Abandonment in October 1991. Finally, Caron signed Temporary Use Agreements with NH in 1996 and 1999, explicitly stating "The State is the owner of a section of railroad corridor". Under State and Federal law: Explicitly acknowledging the State as owner IS "actual notice" of eminent domain. RSA 228:60-a gives Caron, at most, a 5 year clock to demand just compensation, which expired decades before the 2026 dispute.

* The timeline problem for Caron continues. Even ignoring NH Supreme Court precedent on RSA 228:60a, NH would still win a textbook case of Adverse Possession. Acquiring land by adverse possession requires the claimant to conspicuously act as the true owner, continuously and adversely (without permission from anyone else claiming to own it) for 20 years. NH built, maintained, and continuously controlled the rail trail well past that 20-year threshold. Furthermore, from at least 1996 until 2024, Caron explicitly acknowledged NH's dominion over the land, in writing, by asking for permission from the State for commercial use of State property. Caron only contested the State's ownership in 2026. Caron's ignorance is no defense from the 20 year Adverse Possession clock. https://www.nashualaw.com/blog/2010/03/adverse-possession-in-new-hampshire/

It's no surprise to me that New Hampshire is zealously defending public trails that New Hampshire has invested a huge amount of tax dollars in, given A. An extremely strong case, and B. The massive negative impact on rail trails across New Hampshire if Caron somehow won.

P.S. For reference, the court has been posting all the documents filed in this case here: https://www.courts.nh.gov/media/requested-cases/civil/state-new-hampshire-department-transportation-v-leonard-caron

Tamworth Distilling makes great cocktails and their outdoor space lets you sit right by a river and enjoy the scenery outdoors. Schilling brewery also puts you right by a river on their patio with beautiful views. What other places offer the best outdoor view while sipping a cold one? Looking for places to soak in the last few weeks of the summer.