
r/sportsbetting

USA/BEL how did Vegas get this so wrong?
Tim Ream is a great MLS defender, but not quality against UEFA Champions League level starters. Belgium has 3 guys off the bench that would be USA’s best players. The last time they played Belgium scored 5. There was nothing to suggest USA should be the favorite. Was it just that the odds floated and there was a tonne of action of USA to balance?
Messi, both teams to score, argentina, in that order
97.5%
The percentage of sports better that end up losers.
As a long time sports better, I always said, meh I can beat the house edge, and now with Kalshi it’s not really gambling it’s trading.
Bullshit.
I’m officially retiring boys. If you choose to stay, I hope you become the 2.5%.
What you guys think?
I feel like this is a good simple slip but nothing is guaranteed. This strategy worked for me yesterday so let’s see how today goes!
What does it look like when a team is this big a favorite? Egypt vs Argentina breaks it down
Unfortunately the books cleaned up last night by making everyone believe the USA had a chance. What a horrific performance after such an incredible tournament.
Messi opens the scoring in 23.1 percent of simulated matches. That is not just the highest first-goal rate on the board, it is more than double the next names on the list, Julian Alvarez and Lautaro Martinez at 10.3 and 10.2 percent respectively. When one player personally drives the opening goal in nearly one of every four game scripts, it shapes how you read every downstream market.
The most interesting gap in the entire board lives on the Asian handicap. Running this game 10,000 times off DK's own lines, Egypt +1 covers 41.1 percent of the time. The book's implied probability on that same side is 36.4 percent, a 4.7 point gap that is the widest divergence anywhere on this slate. To put that in plain terms: the runs say Egypt holds the margin to one goal or wins outright in more than four out of ten scripts, while the book is pricing that outcome closer to just over one in three.
The mechanism behind it is the total distribution. The runs land on a median of 3 goals with an average of 2.9, and Argentina's own team total sits at a projected 2.1 goals scored. Low-scoring Argentina wins mean a lot of 1-0 and 2-0 scorelines, and sure enough, those are the two most likely outcomes at 14.2 and 14.1 percent. A 1-0 Argentina win is a push on Argentina -1, and that 0-0 draw lands at 10.1 percent. All of that weight in the low-margin bucket is what produces the Egypt +1 coverage rate the runs are generating.
BTTS sits at 38.2 percent against a book number of 37.9, essentially dead even. The board outside the Asian handicap is one of the more efficiently priced games you will find anywhere, which makes that +1 gap stand out even more against an otherwise quiet set of reads.
As always, I'm not giving out picks, "locks," or anything like that. I'm simply breaking down games through the sportsbooks' odds and how they may see the matchup. Take the information however you wish, but none of this is a lock or pick, and focusing on that takes away from real discussion.
Easy Money?
Argentina had been offside like 2,3,2,3 in 4 matches.
last leg is mbappe to be top scorer at world cup - cash or ride??
cash out has been as high as $900, just looking to see what you guys would do!
VICTORY- Boom, on we go
About $1.3k up on the WC now after an early good hit and bad run.
Doing something similar over the next few days what are you guys eying up for a result BBTS bet!
Nothing better than sweating a World Cup bet in person
Balogun to score or assist is free
I’ve learned that betting on “1+ shots on target” on a top player is better than BTTS & ML.
Fuck Moneyline, fuck BTTS , a simple 1 shot on target .. don’t even have to make it in, just simply shoot it and you hit. Fuck the rest.
Why voided? Do you have any clue?
I cannot understand: I can't find on the site any proof for which the player is required to be in the starting XI. It's Bet365 France, if this can be helpful