r/theories

​

Christianity has lasted thousands of years

Judaism has lasted thousands of years

It's not unthinkable to believe that Molech worship has also endured as well, especially given all the recent revelations concerning human sacrifice by some in power today

Infact, Molech worship may have secretly evolved into what is now Baphomet, simply rebranded and labeled as philosophy to those who aren't on the inside

Both have physical similarities, and the children next to the goat headed statue has to make you wonder

The name Baphomet appears during the 1307 trials of the Knights Templar, as Templars were accused of worshipping something called “Baphomet"

What Baphomet was at that time is debated but in its current form, looking at the full statue it's hard not to wonder about the full symbolism and true meaning

Today, celebrities promote or acknowledge hidden systems including Freemasons, Thelema, and Baphomet, and it might not be a far stretch if the 3 are actually interconnected

..........................................................

The common beliefs about Molech among most scholars are:

• Molech = a separate deity

• Molech = a type of sacrifice

• Molech = a ritual associated with Baal worship

..........................................................

In the Bible he, is a separate deity. I choose to go with that one because..

1. People in the Bible were alive back then when it was common

2. If world leaders do serve Molech they would ensure it remain a secret and obscure the truth about it

..........................................................

Would love to know your thoughts.

If we lived in a 2D world and a 3D sphere passed through our world, what we would observe is a point that transforms into a circle that increases in circumference to a maximum, then decreases in circumference, transforms to a point and then disappears. It's a 3D sphere, but we can only perceive it in 2D. Scale up to our 3D world. If a 4D sphere passed through our 3D world, we would perceive a sphere, one dimension less.

Now think about the 4D of our reality. We can move in 3D and we percieve in 3D, but there is a dimension in which we cannot move or perceive in the same geometry. A 4D sphere able to move in all 4 dimensions would appear to us as a 3D sphere with the ability to enter and leave our perception. If it moves in a direction we cannot perceive, it just vanishes.

My theory on what caused the big bang was that a prior universe like ours grew so rapidly and huge that it imploded on itself. This created a clean slate of a new universe. I believe one day our universe will do the same. And the cycle will continue for eternity.

I know it might sound a bit like nonsense, but people always think that middle age people just looked at massive dinosaur bones, mistook them for dragons, and made up their lore. But as we know, dinosaurs are actually the ancestors of birds.

With evolution processing over such a long period of time ( 300.000 years for human to appear ), what if there was another branch of dinosaurs that became bird like creatures and survived much longer but then became extinct early on?

This would perfectly explain why dragons in many different countries have reptile skin but also fur or manes. Because their bones became hollow (like birds), they wouldn't fossilize well and that branch eventually went extinct.

Even though OKC lost game 1, the script is in! Drama sells.. The NBA decides who wins each game, and the refs are incentivised to promote the agenda through positive reinforcement.. Here are NBA players who openly admit the NBA is rigged and heavily favors the stars and the revenue they generate. Remember this video and this post, OKC will be the 2026 champions.. The script is in! Take a look..

so i was thinking that what if the big bang wasnt the beginning but a continuation of what already existed and what i mean is that by the end of the universes existence we just go BANG and that isnt the end but a full restart and what we think of as the beginning is actually just another restart to a never ending cycle that never ends and what we think will be the end of everything is just a continuation of something that has already happened many times before, i would really like to know what everyones thoughts on this is.

What if your standard PC is already a quantum computer—and we are just calculating it wrong?

Think about it for a moment: The entire tech world is currently investing billions into massive, multi-million-dollar dilution refrigerators just to keep a few fragile qubits stable. We are chasing hardware that is so complex it practically gets in its own way.

But what if quantum superposition isn’t a mysterious, physical state that needs to be frozen in time?

What if superposition is actually just a pure, deterministic phase equation?

If we stop trying to calculate random probability collapses and instead start aligning the exact phase synchronization indices, something incredible happens: The exponential complexity of quantum mechanics collapses into a linear $O(n)$ equation.

This would mean:

• No more hardware wars: We wouldn't need physical quantum chips. Any standard processor could calculate this resonance.
• The wireless Hilbert network: Every standard PC, server, or AI core could "wirelessly" connect into the Hilbert space through pure mathematical resonance—acting as a global middleware completely immune to decoherence.

We don’t need colder fridges. We just need a better operating system for reality that bridges the gap between classical code and universal frequency fields.

Are we really building the right machines, or did we just forget how to program the foundation correctly?

Hello fellow redditors, so, I was thinking about brainrot, and I wondered how they are created. I decided to do an experiment to see how many people need to say it before it counts as brainrot, and I got an idea. I am trying to make 81 a thing to see if that is how brainrot is created, so please try to start saying it, so we can see if brainrot is made by the people. Please share this post to help this experiment go even further. Let's try to prove or disprove this theory, so we can fully understand.

In Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons’ Watchmen, it is believed that Hooded Justice is Rolf Muller, a circus strongman. But this is not the case.

Hooded Justice is actually Laurence Schexnayder, the Minutemen’s publicist.

What Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons have achieved is actually giving a superhero a true secret identity. One that no reader was able to figure out for 40 years.

The following post will be the entire theory in full.

However, it works best visually by being able to see the photos included.

At the end of the post, in a comment, I will post a link to my 100% free Substack so you can see the same theory laid out with the accompanying visual aids if you so desire.

Here we go:

Alan Moore once wrote a comic book called “Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?” with a publication date of September 1986. The same publication date as his and Dave Gibbons’ Watchmen issue 1.
In the picture, you’ll see some villains in this comic book laughing about the ‘great gag’ of Superman’s secret identity. That all Superman had to do was “comb his hair and stick on a pair of glasses” to fool all of humanity.

It’s a widely raised issue in the comic book community - “How can NO ONE tell that Clark Kent and Superman are one and the same?” Many believe that if they lived in the DC Universe, they wouldn’t be ignorant. They would be able to put the pieces together.

It is my belief that Alan Moore saw the comic book community react in this manner and said “Okay, let’s see if you can put it together. Without being told. Can you figure out that the mystery identity of Hooded Justice is actually the low-key man wearing glasses?”
And you know what? We could not figure it out.
Don’t worry, I’m honesty not claiming to be “smarter” than you, I read Watchmen about a dozen times over a 20-25 year period before it clicked.
But luckily it did click and I’m here today to walk you through some evidence I’ve gathered that proves Larry Schexnayder is Hooded Justice. Or, at the very least, provides a much more substantial case than that of Rolf Muller.

Hooded Justice and Larry Schexnayder are NEVER in the same room.
You never see them side by side. Larry doesn’t appear in the Minutemen Christmas photo but HJ does. In the photo op scene in 1940, Larry is completely absent. In Larry’s wedding photo, most of the Minutemen are there but Hooded Justice is not.

Many people seem to believe that the Photographer in the photo op scene is Larry but it is not. The Photographer is short and extremely balding. Larry is taller (as we’ll see in issue 9) and as you can see in his wedding photo, Larry has hair in the middle of his head whereas the photographer does not (with the exception of the couple strands of hair we see).
Let’s talk about that photo op scene.
In the picture, we see Nite Owl paying the Photographer. But why?
Larry Schexnayder is the Minutemen’s publicist. Presumably he set the whole photo op up. Why isn’t Larry in this scene and why isn’t Larry handling the money? This is literally his job.

Instead, it is Hollis Mason who is handling the photo op duties, holding the money and dealing with the Photographer.
Why is the Photographer only making eight prints?
There are eight vigilantes, sure. But there’s also Larry. He would also need a print as the publicist. The photographer isn’t making nine prints, he’s only making eight, and Alan Moore decided he wanted the readers to know that. The only line that the Photographer has in the entire book draws attention to the fact that only eight prints are being made when the team should be receiving nine prints.
It’s not complicated. It’s rather simple. Larry is already getting a print as Hooded Justice.
Now let’s compare the wedding photo to the 1940 photo from the photo op.

Do you notice that the Minutemen (with the exception of the Silhouette and Dollar Bill as they are deceased) are standing in the exact same positions in both photos? There are two differences. One is Larry and HJ are standing in each other’s spot while Sally has her arm wrapped around them in the same manner. The other is that Eddie is not in front of the Minutemen but rather off to the side.
But consider:

What happens if we shift perspective? If everyone in the photo turns to where the arrows are pointing? NOW Eddie is in front while the rest of the Minutemen retain their original lineup.
The lone difference being that HJ and Larry are standing in each other’s spot.
And why wouldn’t Hooded Justice attend the wedding? After all, both Larry and Sally helped cover for him for over a decade, they should all be the best of friends.
Even Eddie Blake attended the wedding. The man who attempted to rape Sally a decade previous.
The reason is simple, it’s not complicated, Larry Schexnayder is Hooded Justice.

The Snowglobe Incident
In Watchmen issue 9, Laurie tells Doctor Manhattan about her earliest memory. She was five years old when she overheard her parents, Sally and Larry, arguing while she was entranced by a Snowglobe in their home.

The argument that Sally and Larry are having is that Sally is revealing to Larry, for the first time, her affair with Comedian, and that Laurie is not Larry’s daughter.
In 1955, Hooded Justice disappeared. We know the year because Rorschach tells us in issue 1.

Though Laurie never says what year the Snowglobe Incident occurs, she says she was 5 years old when it happened. Laurie was born in 1950, so that means the Incident happens in 1955.
We know that Laurie was born in 1950 or LATE 1949 because Laurie says she is 35 years old in issue 1 which occurs in mid-October 1985.

After this Snowglobe Incident, we would never see or hear from Larry Schexnayder or Hooded Justice ever again. Neither of them are seen after this Incident. They disappear at the same time.

Symmetry is Cool
Symmetry tells us quite a bit in Watchmen. It feeds us information if you’re willing to receive it.
Let’s compare Sally’s assault from 1940 to the Snowlglobe Incident and see if we can’t find some genuine symmetry.
During the Snowglobe Incident, Laurie makes a pattern of movements that we have already witnessed before in the book. The same pattern of movements that Eddie makes back in 1940.
These movements will ultimately result in HJ/Larry raging.
Observe:
Eddie and Laurie go into a room that they’re not supposed to be in.
Eddie waltzes in on Sally while she’s changing. Laurie enters her parents’ room, perhaps their study or bedroom.

Eddie and Laurie then touch Silk Spectre’s costume.

We then see Eddie and Laurie’s reflection in a circular type mirror.

Eddie, caught by HJ, has a terrified look on his face. Laurie, caught by Larry, has a terrified look on her face.

Both scenes culminate into Hooded Justice/Larry hovering over Eddie and Laurie in rage.

This is not an accident. These two scenes are symmetrical, and trying to tell us something. Trying to tell us that Larry Schexnayder is Hooded Justice.
The symmetry doesn’t end there.

Most readers believe that what Eddie is alluding to is that roughing up a fellow man/boys gets Hooded Justice “hot.”
But there’s another possibility. What if Eddie was saying that Eddie roughing up Sally is what gets Hooded Justice hot?
Consider Sally calling out Larry on the potential letter he would write to his porn mag. She describes Larry as a cuck who enjoys other men getting rough with Sally while he watches.
That is Larry’s kink. To watch Sally get manhandled by another man.
Going back to the assault scene with this in mind, and knowing that Larry IS Hooded Justice, “this is what gets you hot” means Eddie’s treatment of Sally. It fits. Perfectly.
Because Larry Schexnayder is Hooded Justice.
Now let’s get to it. The Joke. The Gag. More symmetry.

The first picture shows Eddie, in 1940, promising that ultimately the joke will be on Hooded Justice. With pink glass behind him.
The second picture is the joke ultimately landing for Laurie. With pink glass behind her. That Eddie and her mom pulled a “gag” on her.
This is the same joke. Without this, there is no payoff to the joke that Eddie promises.
Without this, the “payoff” of the joke is an off panel death of HJ possibly committed by Eddie. That nobody in the book confirms.
And “gag”. Isn’t this the same term that Alan Moore used to describe Superman’s alternate identity? “What a great gag!”
This revelation occurs in Chapter Nine - The Darkness of Mere Being. Or rather, Mirror Being. The symmetry is shouting at us “Larry Schexnayder is Hooded Justice!”

Symbolism…on Larry’s face.
Dave Gibbons lets the reader know through visual cues as well.
In the pictures, we see a Klansmen’s mask in the corner of Larry’s head, and there’s an “H” and “J” hovering over Larry’s glasses.
It is not at all subtle. It’s literally in your face on Larry’s face.

Some will point out that in issue 9, Larry writes a letter to Sally and discusses Hooded Justice as if he were a different person.
That’s great, and I could point out a hundred instances where Clark Kent is all “So I was speaking with Superman and…”
Kent writes about Superman as if he were a different person all of the time in the various articles he submits for the Daily Planet.
So if Kent can do it a hundred times, why can’t Larry do it once?
See the parallel there with the Superman theme?

Some will choose to believe Hollis Mason when Hollis says that “Hooded Justice was the biggest man I’ve ever seen.” They will believe that over their own sense of sight.
They will betray their own senses in order to believe a comic book character. Don’t be that person.
Look in any panel where HJ appears, especially the photo from the photo op. He is literally no bigger than Captain Metropolis or Nite Owl himself. Dave Gibbons has all of the men standing just a bit taller than the women and so we know that Gibbons is drawing proportionally here. Hooded Justice is no bigger than any other male vigilante in that photo. Trust your eyes over the lies of a comic book character:

This is not, by a long shot, Hollis Mason’s only lie. Though it may be his biggest. That will be discussed in a future post.

Sally Knows Something
In Watchmen issue 9, Sally does an interview in the back material of the book and she makes a slip up.
She is speaking about the two gay men who were on the Minutemen and makes the comment “they’re both dead now.”
She doesn’t name names but we know one is Hooded Justice based on various claims suggesting HJ and Metropolis had a relationship.

But…
How does she know that Hooded Justice is dead?
According to Hollis Mason’s book, published in 1962, the world at large has no idea what happened to Hooded Justice. He simply vanished.

And in 1985, 23 years after Mason’s book is published, Rorschach makes a comment that “Hooded Justice went missing in ‘55”.
So presumably, the world at large still has no idea what happened to Hooded Justice 30 years after he disappeared.

Yet. Fourteen years after Hollis Mason says that Hooded Justice simply vanished, and nine years before Rorschach claims the same…Sally has information that neither of them have. That Hooded Justice is DEAD, not missing.
To me, this means one of two things. She either killed him herself OR she helped cover it up. Perhaps Eddie helped her?
Regardless, she knows something that nobody else on the planet knows. She knows Hooded Justice is dead.
Even in chapter 11, Ozymandias confirms that he can’t prove what happened to Hooded Justice one way or the other. But Sally knows.

If Sally did have something to do with HJ’s murder…
Then who is Rolf Muller to Sally? What is their connection?
There is NONE. Nada. Nothing.
Rolf Muller is a big nothingburger in relation to anyone at all, but specifically for Sally, the same.
There is no motive for Sally to kill Rolf Muller.
But Schexnayder?
The last time we visibly see Schexnayder, he is hovering over Laurie in a rage while Sally pleads with him to leave Laurie alone as she is just a kid.
That’s the best motive ever to kill someone. Protecting your child.

Superman’s Betrayal, and his True Face
If Hooded Justice/Larry Schexnayder is meant to be a subversion of Superman/Clark Kent, then consider that the very first panel of the entire book tries to tell us so.
Observe:

“I have seen its true face.”
What happens if we look at this panel from another perspective? What happens if we simply flip the panel upside down?

That appears to be an image of Superman’s cape, yellow emblem and all, with a knife sticking in its back.

Gibbons tells us right off the bat, secretly, that Watchmen is a betrayal of Superman. It works two ways.
The subversion itself, that instead of an upstanding being with a heart of gold, Watchmen’s Superman is only in it for the money and his rough kinks. It also tells us that Schexnayder will get betrayed.

Eliminating the Competition
I’ve told you how it makes sense that Larry Schexnayder is Hooded Justice.
Now let me explain why it’s impossible that Rolf Muller is Hooded Justice. Well, if we believe Hollis Mason.
Consider that Hollis Mason tells us that Rolf Muller disappeared at “the height of the Senate Subcommittee meetings.”
We know Hollis is referring to the Army/McCarthy meetings of 1954 because this was the height of McCarthy’s communist hunt. Which its height reached in June 1954. Hollis claims that Rolf Muller disappeared at this time and three months later a body turned up in the Boston Harbor - tentatively Muller’s body. Three months after June would be September 1954.
Yet Rorschach told us back in issue 1 that Hooded Justice disappeared in 1955.

If Rolf Muller quit his job, disappeared, and tentatively died three months later all in the year 1954, then it is physically IMPOSSIBLE for a dead man to be roaming around as Hooded Justice in 1955.
Rolf Muller CANNOT be Hooded Justice. IF we believe Hollis Mason. Which, again, is its own can of worms as Mason consistently lies.

Overall, I believe my case that Larry Schexnayder is Hooded Justice FAR surpasses Hollis Mason’s little theory that even he tells the reader to take with a grain of salt.
Which case do you believe?

I mean we could have been anything.

We could have been a worm, a plant, a bird, a lion, anaconda

Why did we become humans?

Is this some kind of game where there are many levels.

Like level 1. You become a worm

Level 2; You become a plant

Level 3. You become a lion

Level 4. You become a human?

Ever notice the numbers 6 and 7 seem to appear more often ever since the meme came out? I’m not talking about references to the meme itself.

But I was watching the mandalorian season 1 and they had mentioned a number, not Heavy spoilers but just a “I scanned the ship and the hyperdrive is only operation at 67.5%”
And it made me think. A lot of people be saying they never noticed six and 7 being that prevalent and they started to notice a lot more.

Imagine a time traveler going back in time to play the ultimate meme joke on EVERYONE.

a gen alpha right now is walking around as a child just being a child but they will grow up to find the technology that allows them to time travel.

They will go back in time and plant the seeds for media and entertainment to have the VI Sept meme placed everywhere.

Just like in breaking bad as well a character was talking about money and they said “3 hundred and seis VII dollars each”

The courthouse scene in the bee movie had one of the court house guys do the gesture

Another example is a Michael Jackson interview or something on tv with a tv host. Michael Jackson was explaining something related to math like “3 and 3 is what?”
The host replies “six” Micheal says “and one more?”
The host says “7” and begins to laugh!!!

Are these mere coincidences or is this a bigger thing that time travel DOES IN FACT EXIST!!!

The person who made time travel was a bit of a joker, taking jobs in these media to subtly plant the meme into our minds without even us realizing… now when we go back to enjoy our favourite media such as Sid the science kid… we no longer see the kids singing… but we see the girl in the glasses doing the gesture… it makes us flinch like a abused dog…

I would not be surprised if… this time traveler also had genetic technology and placed a height growth in la melo ball… I wouldn’t be surprised if that kid who first said the meme was placed there by the very same time traveling guy… maybe… that kid IS the time traveler before growing up…

Since gravitational waves and light travels at exactly the same speed, what if light is dragged/riding/partnered through space using gravity waves. and it is not light speed. but gravitational waves that limit how fast light can travel. And when photons interacts with matter the photon dislodges from the original gravitational wave, it is then redirected and it hitchhikes onto multi directional gravitational waves from distant stars/black holes/planets/galaxies. meaning the speed of light is not fastest thing in the universe but should be measured in gravitational wave speed

Light does not travel at light speed independently

The speed we call "c" is actually the natural propogration speed of gravitational waves, not an inherent property of light itself