
Red-pill/manosphere actively makes boys/men into anti-social misogynists to keep them tuned in
Some have talked about how the red pill/manosphere teaches boys and men to limit themselves, but not enough people talk about how it's all an effort to make boys and men even more anti-social and less appealing to women so that it validates what the content creator is saying, thus they tune in more.
I don't know if a term for it exists, but there is such a thing where you change someone's personality or affect them in some way that causes you to become necessary for them. Closest thing I can think of is "grooming". An example of this is how dating apps are not designed to be good because they would lose interactions if they successfully paired people off and got them to delete the app. It's not an original statement to say that the whole red-pill/manosphere movement is one giant grift. Like everything far right, especially the government, it's meant to target people's fears and insecurities in order to control them.
Loneliness is happening to everybody, man and woman. Gay and straight. That will happen with society becoming a digitized late capitalist hell hole, especially following a devastating pandemic. But grifters tuned in to the way that otherwise harmless and innocent boys/men that they are entitled to companionship.
Women, for the past several decades, have managed to successfully navigate society without men. They do not need a husband to have a fulfilling life, or get something as mundane as a credit card or loan. Straight women still have desires for romance and sex, but they don't NEED it. If a man doesn't come into their life, oh well. It's not the end of the world. But for men, they NEED a woman. They need the prize of have a woman romantically and sexually. It's a confirmation of manhood. And grifters have capitalized on this in an age where everyone is lonely.
If someone legitimately cared about the distinct loneliness and insecurities that men face, they would kindly advise that person to look within. You can't control society or people's perception of you. Accept the possibility that you may never find a girlfriend or wife. What then? You invest in yourself, friends, and whatever family you do have. Go on vacation, start a business, become an artist, pick up a trade, etc. Life is more than just intimacy. And maybe by doing these things you can be less insecure and maybe even find a woman doing these things have a good relationship.
But the grifters have taught boys and men to do the opposite. It's women's fault. It's liberals fault. Its this conspiracy for women to take over. That women having equal rights (not more than men, equal) somehow means that men are no longer able to be with women. What was once promised to men (because women couldn't exist in society without a man), men have to now work for it. They don't implore men to improve in any meaningful way. They teach them to double down on their insecurities, entitlement, and anger.
And why would they do this? Some people might think this is a psyop meant to control the population and help with recruiting for ICE/secret police, but I also think it's full of grifters getting their customers hooked. The more you validate the feelings of these boys and men, the more they get addicted to tuning in. They want to be validated. And this is the closest these men will ever get to a community. Having a healthy community means being vulnerable. Not here. Vulnerability is masked in anger and hatred. I'm willing to bet half of these grifters don't even believe what they are peddling, they are just saying the right buzzwords to get views, clicks, likes, and donations. Monetizing internet personalities is causing people to become cult-of-personalities for the sake of monetary value.
So it's obvious that this is all a grift, but do you think they intentionally set out to make boys and men more angry and less appealing to women in order to keep coming back to them for advice and validation?