Every sax is in good condition, except that's not true, and repairs cost $$$$. Under what circumstances can I return as "Not as describe?"
Some sample descriptions:
>“The saxophone is almost like new. It has been played more frequently over the last year. Before that, it was only played occasionally. Regularly serviced. Everything is functional.
To me, this implies that the sax does not need repairs. Would eBay agree?
> Mechanically the sax is very sound and has been disassembled, cleaned and oiled. All keys and mechanisms function properly. The pads are in very good shape and do not need replacement. The sax has been regulated professionally, and it plays great with that good vintage sound.
Even more so, the sax does not need repair.
> This gorgeous alto sax has been cleaned and adjusted. The horn plays great with a smooth, rounded tone on the included Goldentone mouthpiece. 2 pads (one left palm key pad and the bottom back pad) have been replaced; the existing pads are in very good to great playing condition. Further pad replacement will be at the winning buyer's discretion. Corking and felts are in great shape, and the springs show quick response.
Perhaps the bold sentence implies repairs may be needed?
What if all the pads are fine but the sax shop says that $1000 of other repairs are needed, esp. new corking, felts and springs?
All of these sellers do not accept returns.
What language do I need to justify a NAD return?
> Absolutely no repairs needed.
??
Thanks for your help!