Why Test Creative on Meta Anyway?
I'm probably thinking too deeply about this, but here you go. I've been thinking through how to test new creatives. The typical structure that's suggested is to have a testing campaign you can laod up with 20 or 100 creatives a week to see what works. Then, a stable scaling campaign to put "winners" into.
I'm probably slow to the party, but I have learned that "moving" a winning ad, isn't what I thought.
I thought, an ad is winning, so move it and all the learning and winning data goes with it to the scaling campaign. There, the ad uses the higher budget to keep building on what it starting in the testing campaign.
What I think now, and is probably more correct. When moved, the "winning ad" starts fresh just as if you put a random ad in without testing. The reason it is projected to work in the scaling campaign isn't as much that it brings data. It's that the message and angle worked with the test audience, so it's likely to work at a broader scale with a bigger audience. The new campaign still has to learn the same as if it was brand new idea.
Am I right in my thinking here?