u/AcornTopHat

This was the response I got which I found interesting:

“There’s no reliable worldwide count. No central database tracks every person killed while protected by professional security, and the definition varies—“security” could mean one bodyguard, a close-protection team, police escort, or military guards.

The number is certainly **at least in the hundreds**, and likely much higher, when including heads of state, politicians, diplomats, business leaders, celebrities, and witnesses. Notable examples include:

- **Abraham Lincoln** — assassinated in 1865 despite presidential security arrangements.
- **Archduke Franz Ferdinand** — assassinated in 1914 while accompanied by official guards and military personnel.
- **Mahatma Gandhi** — assassinated in 1948 while protected by attendants and police.
- **John F. Kennedy** — assassinated in 1963 while surrounded by the Secret Service.
- **Anwar Sadat** — assassinated in 1981 during a military parade guarded by Egyptian security forces.
- **Indira Gandhi** — assassinated in 1984 by members of her own security detail.
- **Yitzhak Rabin** — assassinated in 1995 despite Israeli security protection.
- **Benazir Bhutto** — killed in 2007 despite extensive security.
- **Osama bin Laden** — killed in 2011 while protected by armed guards.
- **Jamal Khashoggi** — killed in 2018 inside a Saudi consular facility despite official security personnel being involved.

If “professional security” means a dedicated private close-protection team rather than police or military protection, the total would be much smaller, but it still has never been systematically counted. The key point is that professional protection reduces risk; it does not make assassination impossible—especially when attackers have insider access, overwhelming force, explosives, or exploit public movements.”

________________________________

Sorry for the AI, I just couldn’t sleep and it occurred to me that it must be extremely rare for someone to be killed while being actively guarded by a team of professional security. The last part of the response made my eyes go wide….

“especially when attackers have insider access, overwhelming force, explosives, or exploit public movements.”

I don’t subscribe to Andrew (The Crucible), but somehow YouTube gave me an alert that AW is live. He is so nasty. Can’t stand him!

The Youtube algorithm suggested to me and I enjoyed it. It takes a very principled man to admit his mind was changed.

That’s it. That’s the Tweet.

If any women support him after that one sentence, maybe they are.

I hope this discussion is allowed here because I really am in need of advice from my fellow Candace watchers.

For context, I have been with my husband for 22 years, since we were teenagers. I have a sister-in-law that I’ve known since she was 14 years old.

My SIL is now in her mid-late 30s and is desperately trying to settle down, get married and have at least one baby before that window closes for her.

So she met a guy last October and they just closed on a house last month. They are locked in (legally) and moving fast. My husband and I are trying to support her even though this guy has said several things already to me that had me like WTAF.

Anyway, they were over our house the other day and I was wearing my Candace hoodie. This guy (a US history teacher, to boot) starts trying to debate me about the Charlie Kirk case.

I asked him what he knew about the case and he said, “Some kid shot him”. Ok…

So, I literally started a time-lined, detailed monologue about what happened and he just stood there, wide eyed, arms folded, smirking like a psycho and kept interrupting me with these sound bites:

”You do know millions of people hate Candace and think her and her followers are psychopaths, right?”

”But is Candace even being a good mom”

”Then why isn’t any of this on the news?”

I think you guys would be proud of me, as I remained calm and remembered to collect my thoughts and not give in to his trolling.

I asked him, “Can I ask you something? Do you believe that every detail of what you teach as ‘history’ is the exact way it happened?”

He stopped and just stared at me for several seconds and then said, “I mean, they can’t know I guess exactly what happened”.

And then I asked, “And who writes the history books?”

He just stood there and didn’t respond, so I looked him in the eyes and said, “exactly”.

_________________

Same night this guy, right in front of my husband and I, starts talking about their aunt who lives in a beach community’s house and says, “[SIL’s Name], you need to start calling your aunt because we need to get her house when she dies.”

________________

Guys, I feel like I’m dealing with a tough situation and I just was wondering if anyone else has had to deal with a person like this in real life and/or if I could get some advice.

I obviously couldn’t pose this on a normal sub lol.

This is a clip from Candace Owens’ podcast show last night. She has presented a new, never shown before video of the man on the roof at UVU the day Charlie Kirk was murdered in front of the world.

Haters gonna hate about Candace, but for the last ten months, she has been bringing a plethora of evidence that suggests the official narrative surrounding the death of Charlie is very, very off… to say the least.

I challenge you fine people of /conspiracy to watch this video and really think about what you are seeing.

Jon Bray’s latest YouTube video regarding the Rode mic (no sound).

An interview Candace sat for while she was in Russia. A quick, but sweet interview!