Supplemental vs HLR differing C&P results
As the title says, when I originally filed for increase I was denied due to the DBQ. I filed HLR saying criteria for increase was provided in my personal statement. I explained this in the informal conference and they sent a duty to assist. As a result I got called for another C&P. The second examiner informed me that she looked through my records and all that jazz and actually listened to what I was telling her. Her DBQ was (it appears) more in favor for an increase. In cases like these, which opinion does the HLR rather favor?