Image 1 — A First Look at Sherlock Holmes: The Adventure of the Innsmouth Crown, the play I wrote at the Edinburgh Fringe starting next week
Image 2 — A First Look at Sherlock Holmes: The Adventure of the Innsmouth Crown, the play I wrote at the Edinburgh Fringe starting next week
Image 3 — A First Look at Sherlock Holmes: The Adventure of the Innsmouth Crown, the play I wrote at the Edinburgh Fringe starting next week
Image 4 — A First Look at Sherlock Holmes: The Adventure of the Innsmouth Crown, the play I wrote at the Edinburgh Fringe starting next week

A First Look at Sherlock Holmes: The Adventure of the Innsmouth Crown, the play I wrote at the Edinburgh Fringe starting next week

I made a post about a month ago showing the poster for the Lovecraftian Sherlock Holmes play I've written and am staging at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival, for on week only.

Well, I'd like to share the first looks at our Sherlock Holmes (Calum Philp) and Dr. John Watson (George Atkinson).

Synopsis: Whilst clearing out her mother's belongings from her care home, Kelly discovers a hidden family secret. Her grandfather was Dr John Watson. As she digs further, Kelly uncovers the truth of the untold final case of Sherlock Holmes: a case involving an otherworldly crown of mysterious origin, and the abandoned American coastal town of Innsmouth.

If anyone on here is interested, we're on 24th-29th August, 7.05pm
Theatre 3, theSpace @ Surgeons’ Hall

u/AlmostRandomNow — 1 day ago

An Overview of My Personal Rankings of ALL Doctor Who

Since October 2023, just before the show's 60th, I started watching Doctor Who from the very beginning and decided that when I stopped enjoying it, I'd end my watching streak... so that means that 2 weeks ago, after over 2 and a half years of watching, I finished Doctor Who from start to end. Oh, and I actually ended up writing a review for each individual story on either Letterboxd or Tardis Guide.

If you want to look at all the data, here's a link to the full spreadsheet for you to look at that also included links to the reviews of each story (after I watched them).

All this data is the 'objective' opinions of my rankings for individual episodes and stories; I do have much more subjective opinions on actors, companions, and who my favourites are, but these are the numbers purely from what I thought of the stories.

As well, this is only for main episodes of the show, so no minisodes or other appearances on other shows and spin-offs, with the only exception being The Night of The Doctor with Paul McGann. There's an entire other tab on the spreadsheet for people to look at the rating with minisodes and 'canonical' appearances on other shows. This means no audio plays either.

Oh, and going forward, everything is being rated out of 10, so any number you might see is to be seen as '-.--/10'


RANKING THE DOCTORS

So, the first question that could be, who ends up being the highest rated Doctor/how would you rank the different Doctors? As I said before, I have my favourite, but just looking at my favourite Doctors based on how I rated their episodes/stories.

  1. Ninth Doctor – 8.5

  2. Tenth Doctor – 7.70

  3. Third Doctor – 7.29

  4. Seventh Doctor – 7.25

  5. Fourth Doctor – 7.24

  6. Second Doctor – 7.19

  7. First Doctor – 7.03

  8. Fourteenth Doctor – 7

  9. Fifth Doctor – 6.9

  10. Twelfth Doctor – 6.83

  11. Eighth Doctor – 6.5

  12. Eleventh Doctor – 6.38

  13. Sixth Doctor – 6.27

  14. Thirteenth Doctor – 5.17

  15. Fifteenth Doctor – 4.38

First of all, you can see I've rated the Tenth and Fourteenth Doctors separately, and due to them being separate entities and different regenerations (though with the same face), I have given them different places on the chart.

Personally, the outliers here are the Twelfth Doctor being far too low on the list, with the First and Second being a little lower than I think they should be. The Fourteenth Doctor is somewhat cheating as well, as he only has 3 TV stories, so I can't say I fully think he's better than the Fifth Doctor, it's just a quirk of the stats.

That being said, I don't find this all the unsurprising, I started watching the show at the age of 8 when Christopher Eccleston started, and while I vaguely knew about the show before, this was my start point, and while I will argue that his series is a fantastic series, and he deserves to be near the top of the list, it's unsurprising that my first Doctor has ended up as my statistical favourite.


BEST SERIES

So, while I listed out the average of all the Doctors, I feel like an entire list of every single series would be somewhat laborious, so I decided to list the top 10 series from across the show's run instead:

  1. Series 1 (2005) - 8.5

  2. Season 25 (1988) - 8.5

  3. Season 7 (1970) - 8.25

  4. Series 3 (2007) - 8

  5. Series 4 (2008) - 8

  6. Season 10 (1973) - 8

  7. Season 14 (1976) - 7.83

  8. Season 5 (1968) - 7.57

  9. Season 18 (1980) - 7.57

  10. Series 9 (2015) - 7.56

Again, very unsurprising that Series 1 (2005), being my first series, is my favourite, but looking at this, this is where I'd say my tastes are more represented. Despite it being RTD1 heavy, with 3 series out of a possible 5 in there (the post-Series 4/2009 specials are their own block of episodes) having Jon Pertwee series and a Patrick Troughton series in there really does make me happy.

I'm surprised at the Tom Baker seasons that have made it into the list personally; I love both Season 14 and Season 18, but neither of them have episodes that I'd consider myself a massive fan of. Jon Pertwee's Season 7 and Season 10 inclusions make a lot more sense to me, as they are series with some of my favourites in there.

And I'm very happy to see Season 5, what I consider the best of 60s Doctor Who, in the top 10. Troughton is one of my personal favourites, and that season has two of my favourite 60s stories.


BEST EPISODES

To me, something has to really stand out to be considered 10/10, and while I am actually quite lenient with giving the rating, I feel like I only give it when a piece of media really moves me and goes above and beyond what is expected of it. In terms of Doctor Who episodes, here are all the episode/stories I gave 10/10:

-Inferno

-Genesis of the Daleks

-City of Death

-The Caves of Androzani

-Remembrance of the Daleks

-The Happiness Patrol

-Dalek

-Father's Day

-The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances

-Bad Wolf/The Parting of the Ways

-The Girl in the Fireplace

-Human Nature/The Family of Blood

-Blink

-Utopia

-Silence in the Library/Forest of the Dead

-Midnight

-Turn Left

-Under the Lake/Before the Flood

-Heaven Sent

-Extremis

I'm sure there's going to be nothing controversial about these picks at all, and everyone will agree and not think less of me for what I've picked.

A very heavy NuWho selection, and it must be said that, interestingly, all the picks are from the Ninth, Tenth and Twelfth Doctors' eras. Upon rewatching through the Eleventh Doctor's era, I was genuinely surprised I didn't give anything a 10/10. Often the episodes I'd think were 10/10 were part one episodes for two-parters, and I wasn't the biggest fan of how the two-parter would end. Interestingly as well, the first 10/10 story for me is Inferno, meaning that it's not until the 1970s that I ranked anything 10/10, despite my love for the 60s era, and specifically Troughton's era.

Another controversial decision here is to consider Heaven Sent and Extremis their own episodes, rather than as part of greater three-part stories. While I see the argument for that, both stories very much stand on their own, and I consider them more than just a 'piece' of a story, and more like their own story within a wider story.


WORST SERIES

Now, I think it's an interesting exercise to look at what I consider the worst series/season across the entire show. I'll be doing the top 10 (or maybe bottom 10) lowest rated series across the entire show's run:

  1. Season 2 (2025) - 3.75

  2. Series 11 (2018) - 4.73

  3. Season 1 (2024) - 5

  4. Series 13 (2021) - 5.17

  5. 2022 Specials (2022) - 5.33

  6. Series 12 (2020) - 5.67

  7. 2015-2016 Specials (2016) - 6

  8. Season 22 (1985) - 6

  9. Season 24 (1987) - 6

  10. Series 7B (2020) - 6.11

To me, this list is actually a lot more interesting, yet expected, than the highest rated list. Looking at this list, it's very clear when I started having problems with the show. I often get accused of certain things when talking about those two eras of the show (the Chibnall and RTD2 eras) because I have major problems with them that are hard to describe, often to do with the technical aspects of story, structure and intention behind what is written. However, I have encountered people who want to simplify my opinions into "you don't like those eras because you're a bigot", which isn't true, and often my pushback against episodes is that they aren't as progressive as they think they are, or end up being far more problematic than they want to be.

The outlier here for me is the 2015-2016 Specials, which I think are two decent episodes, but both are rated 6/10. The other series here are there because some episodes really drag down the rating of other middling-to-fine episodes, but the two 6/10 episodes here actually tell a quite nice, interesting story of The Doctor recovering from Series 9, healing and wrapping up his storyline with River.


WORST EPISODES

Now, this is a lot more interesting for me to look at than the best episodes. Often what I rated 10/10 is just enjoyment, but for me, 1/10 has to be awful and horrendous in either content to the audience, or an episode that is quite literally not fit to air:

-Arachnids in the UK

-Lucky Day

-The Interstellar Song Contest

-Wish World/The Reality War

Another selection that shows the era I'm not a fan of. That being said, I stand by that if these episodes were in other eras of the show, then I'd have rated them the same.

Arachnids in the UK and Wish World/The Reality War fall into the category of episodes unfit for air. I'm sure they have their reasons, but the episodes we were given are not enjoyable in any way to me. The writing is of a level where it would be failed on a GCSE level, and the production/direction/editing is unforgivably bad, so bad that i would fail in any film school if it was handed in (especially in Arachnids in the UK).

On the other hand, both Lucky Day and The Interstellar Song Contest are morally bankrupt episodes with some of the worse version of the Doctor Who universe I've ever seen. The politics at play are horrendous, and I can't excuse things I might find actually good in them because of their awful moral cores (there are other episodes with awful cores, but have somewhat more redeeming qualities thematically).


PERSONAL FAVOURITES

Despite this post being all about my 'objective' favourites, and using my personal ranking to look at what my statistics are, I'd like to just throw out some of my favourite Doctors and stories that maybe don't get represented in my own numbers:

  • First Doctor - The man who started it all, William Hartnell's Doctor is often overlooked and misrepresented, and I think that what scuppers his numbers for me is that there's some experimentation in the show, and while I can't say I love all his stories, the character work and effort put in here is incredible.

  • Second Doctor - If it hadn't been for Troughton, we wouldn't have a show today. Doctor Who was William Hartnell, and if the regeneration (which we take so much for granted) hadn't succeeded, then the show would've never lasted as long as it had, and have died and been forgotten about in the 60s.

  • Twelfth Doctor - Often talked about as being one of the best Doctors, I think the episodes and series he was given are weaker than anything Peter Capaldi does across everything. Even in episodes I don't like, he is the main reason for keeping on watching, and when he's given gold, he somehow elevates it even more.

  • The Macra Terror - Despite being lost, this episode, and the animation for the episode, is one of the best scripts the 60s show has to offer. A mix of classic sci-fi, with it being Doctor Who's take on 1984/Brave New World, it's a fantastic story that is one of the only stories I think is served well by the animation used in its recreation (although I'd love to see the original).

  • Fury from the Deep - I'm a huge fan of the works of H.P. Lovecraft, and this story is maybe the closest Doctor Who has even gotten (on screen) to capturing an actual Lovecraftian tale... of course, it's another missing story, and it's got an animation that goes with it (although not as elevating as The Macra Terror). The part where >!Maggie walks into the sea!< is genuinely horrifying, right out of something like Shadow Over Innsmouth.

  • Enlightenment - One of the coolest, and most underrated episodes for me, and while I can't say I 100% love everything in the Black Guardian trilogy, the concept of the immortal having a boat race is really fun, and for the early 80s, the visuals are amazing.

  • Vengeance on Varos - Another example of Doctor Who doing a classic sci-fi story. It's violent, yes, but I think what's here is a fantastic criticism of what is on TV at the time, and the direction that TV was going, and I'd actually compare it to a TV play in the late 60s called The Year of the Sex Olympics in how forward-thinking it was.

  • Gridlock - Watching the episode again after 2020 hit something in me that I didn't expect it to, and if people haven't revisited it yet, I promise you, it'll bring something to the surface that I don't think was there in 2007.

  • Planet of the Ood - Another 'classical' sci-fi inspired tale I think get overlooked a lot. It's got all the makings of a classic Who episode that people love, and I think it shares a lot of DNA with the likes of The Macra Terror than anything else in RTD1.

  • Listen - A very different kind of story, and I think people often forget how different. It's a lot more thematic and existential than anything else in the show at that point, and while Moffat does tend to lean more towards literary fiction than speculative sci-fi, this is a story that finds that amazing balance. I'm also very glad it never shows anything outside that spaceship.

  • Face the Raven and Hell Bent - Much has been said about Heaven Sent as an episode, and I agree with a lot of it. But I think what is often forgotten, is that it's a Second Part to a trilogy of episodes, and that while there is some fantastic messaging about perseverance and grief in Heaven Sent, I feel that the episode don't hit as hard when removed from the context of Face the Raven and Hell Bent, painting a picture of grief that is far more tragic than I think Heaven Sent alone is.

  • Fugitive of the Judoon - Obviously, I think the most famous aspect of this episode, years removed from it, and the biggest impact, is that of the casting of Jo Martin's fantastic Fugitive Doctor. But to me, something that gets overlooked is an idea that I feel is severely underused (in the show); I sometimes refer to it as 'The Echoes of Gallifrey'. The idea of a civilisation like The Time Lords, even after the "time-locked Time War", we'd occasionally see The Doctor meeting members of his race from before the Time War. I don't want it all the time, but I love the idea of it here, and I love The Doctor's reaction to meeting Division and other Time Lords.

  • The Haunting of Villa Diodati - Hidden within an era I am not the biggest fan of, this episode is maybe the single best example of what I think the era could've been. Maxine Alderton is the best writer to work on the show from 2018 onwards, and I think not getting her back (or maybe her decision not to come back) was a big hindrance for the show.

  • Wild Blue Yonder - To me, the last truly great episode of Doctor Who we've gotten. I spoke about Lovecraft before, but this is more tied to the cosmic horror, and actually is more akin to a less horrific version of Event Horizon. The score for this episode is amazing; when The Doctor opens the ship's windows and the music rises in that way, it feels so amazing and unsettling... I'll never forgive RTD and Murray Gold for using that same musical sting for Belinda in Season 2; it makes no sense and retroactively makes the sting confusing.


CONCLUSIONS

So, looking at the data, I have a love for pre-2010 NuWho and seemingly tend to prefer early to mid-70s Classic Who above everything else; I feel like that's not that uncommon, especially for someone who's currently knocking on the door of being 30 next year. Overall, I obviously love Doctor Who (I wouldn't have done this if I didn't), but it's interesting because looking at my overall average score of the show, you might not think that.

  • AVERAGE SCORE FOR ALL DOCTOR WHO (main show only) - 6.79/10

I promise you, I love the show; it's just clear I like certain kinds of stories more than others, and I think that Doctor Who is the only show on British TV that actually is able to deliver those episodes and concepts well. We now have access to a lot of TV and media from around the world, but so much has been Americanised now, that I just do not like where it's all going, and for a very long time, Doctor Who is this beacon of British storytelling I can cling onto and keep close to my heart.

u/AlmostRandomNow — 9 days ago

I'm staging a Lovecraftian play at the Edinburgh Fringe about Sherlock Holmes traveling to Innsmouth

Title: SHERLOCK HOLMES: THE ADVENTURE OF THE INNSMOUTH CROWN

Synopsis: Whilst clearing out her mother's belongings from her care home, Kelly discovers a hidden family secret. Her grandfather was Dr John Watson. As she digs further, Kelly uncovers the truth of the untold final case of Sherlock Holmes: a case involving an otherworldly crown of mysterious origin, and the abandoned American coastal town of Innsmouth.

POSTER HERE

So, this is a personal project of mine that I've been writing in different version for years, and finally I was convinced to make the push and stage it at the Edinburgh Fringe. I've stayed true to the versions of Sherlock Holmes I like (more specifically Peter Cushing and Basil Rathbone), and to the story of The Shadow Over Innsmouth.

The play incorporates what I like about a lot of Lovecraft's work, the idea of you reading a subjective version of events, sometimes even a few layers deep. Without spoiling it, we never see much of the horror, we only see a portion of what is going on, a part of that grand web that spreads far beyond man. I'm sure some purists might take issue with elements of it, but I wanted to explore something I'd not really seen before. I wanted to throw Holmes and Watson into the Lovecraftian world of horrors and see what might happen when they come out of the other side.

If anyone is interested, we're on 24th-29th August in theSpace@ Surgeons' Hall, Theatre 3 with the title I've posted in the text above.

LINK TO THE SHOW HERE

reddit.com
u/AlmostRandomNow — 27 days ago

I'm staging a Sherlock Holmes play at the Edinburgh Fringe about the detective traveling to the Lovecraftian town of Innsmouth

Title: SHERLOCK HOLMES: THE ADVENTURE OF THE INNSMOUTH CROWN

Synopsis: Whilst clearing out her mother's belongings from her care home, Kelly discovers a hidden family secret. Her grandfather was Dr John Watson. As she digs further, Kelly uncovers the truth of the untold final case of Sherlock Holmes: a case involving an otherworldly crown of mysterious origin, and the abandoned American coastal town of Innsmouth.

So, this is a personal project of mine that I've been writing in different mediums for years, and finally I was convinced to make the push and stage it at the Edinburgh Fringe. The interpretation of Holmes is somewhere between the Peter Cushing and Basil Rathbone versions of Holmes, with the story being set in the late 1940s.

The story itself is more of a Lovecraftian story that features Holmes as one of the main characters. Much of the story is told from Watson's perspective in a very subject manor, and looks a lot more into the personal life and relationship between Holmes and Watson. I'm sure some purists might take issue with elements of it, but I wanted to explore something I'd not really seen with Holmes and Watson before. I wanted to throw Holmes and Watson into the Lovecraftian world of horrors and see what might happen when they come out of the other side.

If anyone is interested, we're on 24th-29th August in theSpace@ Surgeons' Hall, Theatre 3 with the title I've posted in the text above.

LINK TO THE SHOW HERE

u/AlmostRandomNow — 27 days ago

Karmen Petrovic on NXT vs. Karmen Petrovic on AAA

A small rant about continuity and consistency across the WWE brands, sorry.

ON NXT 1st July: Karmen is a lackey of Nattie Neidhart's, implied to be a student of 'The Hart Dungeon', and was pinned in just under 5 minutes by Jadia Parker, who is currently in a feud with Nattie, something of a proving grounds match for Jadia to see if she's worthy of going against Nattie again.

ON AAA 4th July: Karmen is part of the rebooted, seemingly very dangerous Perros del Mal stable that has invaded the promotion. She's the herald of the faction, always appearing first before the group attack, and is often the one to strike the final blow to the babyfaces they've attacked, this week being El Fiscal (as seen in the awesome screenshot), and last week being El Grande Americano himself after the first promo since the Mask vs Mask match.

I just think it's interesting that both promotions are sub-divisions of WWE, and are seen as somewhat separate from the main roster, and so a lot of NXT talent float over to AAA when given the opportunity. AAA usually tapes 3 episodes at a time (1 live and 2 airing the following Saturdays). This means that Karmen had already filmed her big angles on AAA before getting pinned as a part of someone else's feud.

Now, if it were all completely unconnected and completely different promotions, then it'd be somewhat OK with this. However, on the 24th June NXT episode, people actively congratulate Karmen for what she did, and another member of the new Perros del Mal from NXT, Bronco Nima (with the red bandana in the AAA screenshot), is asked by his tag partner about it. So it's canon, and yet you're letting a member of that stable in the other promotion get pinned in less than 5 minutes? And you're not going to make her look all that great in the match?

One hand of WWE not talking to the other hand is actively undermining the story for me, and it's pissing me off quite a bit.

Yes, I'm a nerd, and yes, I'm on the spectrum. How could you tell?

u/AlmostRandomNow — 1 month ago

I got an email telling me my application has been withdrawn... I didn't withdraw it.

I went on a course through Universal Credit a month or so ago, and a few of the candidates at the end (myself included) were officer positions as compliance officers in the DWP. I accepted the offer and did everything that was asked of me, including the reasonable adjustment for the workplace forms (and even had a call about it).

However, today, I got an email saying "This is to confirm your application withdrawal", and when I check on the Civil Service jobs side it's being listed as withdrawn, but I never withdrew my application!!!

I've sent a message through the help function and contacted my Universal Credit officer, and he's passing it up the chain. There's not number I can call for any help on this, so I'm really lost on what to do.

reddit.com
u/AlmostRandomNow — 2 months ago
▲ 773 r/WWE+1 crossposts

[Possible NXT Spoilers] Jessica 'The Unknown' Bogdanov shows off a unique counter in a dark match before last night's NXT [via her IG story @russian.r3d]

Marked as possible spoilers because I feel like this will be the kind of move/style that makes her standout when she debuts

u/AlmostRandomNow — 2 months ago
▲ 167 r/gallifrey

With the 'NuWho' era being done, what's something you think was a missed opportunity in those 20 years?

Personally, I like so much of the show for all it's good and bad, but I think there are things in the NuWho era that were missed out on (which is crazy to say considering it ran for 20 years):

  • A pure historical episode, not I wanted them to be regular, but I think something where the sci-fi is contained to The Doctor and companion is 100% something that would be a fantastic idea, the closest we got was something like Thin Ice, and that was good.

  • The Macra!!! (there's no such thing) The fact the Macra were made big snappy crabs really annoyed me, considering their original story has them basically being really intelligent and controlling things in a 1984-ish way. They had the opportunity to basically redo a version of The Macra Terror and they didn't do it.

  • Gallifrey and the Time Lords are a civilisation that time travelled and explored the galaxy in the past, even after the time war, there should be echoes and time lords form "the past" showing up all over. It took until Series 12 for that to happen once, I don't think it should've happened all the time, but there was an opportunity to see The Doctor talk to a past Time Lord about what's coming

  • Live action Bernice Summerfield. I know she was basically the inspiration for River Song, but I'd have loved to see Lisa Bowerman turn up at least once as Benny on the show, maybe even in a way the Doctor didn't love, because she reminds him of the past version of himself he doesn't like anymore (late stage 7th Doctor)

  • One or two multi-Doctor stories with classic Doctors. We got Time Crash, and those moments in Power of the Doctor, with the only real episode fitting the bill being Twice Upon a Time. I know a lot of the actors were older, but back in 2005-15, they would've still fit the bill IMO, and I wish we got one or two, any more an it would've felt like regular thing

reddit.com
u/AlmostRandomNow — 2 months ago

Series 11 might be the most poorly made series of the entire show (and maybe the entire Chibnall Era as well)

For some background, having not watched most NuWho episodes since they'd first aired, and having not seen most of Doctor Who, back in November 2023, I started a full watch through/semi rewatch of all of Doctor Who on screen, beginning to end. This past week, I did what I was dreading the most, and finished Series 11, Jodie Whittaker and Chris Chibnall's first series.

For context, I have never cared about the gender of The Doctor, the only argument I would say is that The Doctor is a male role model who isn't an action hero and often doesn't use violence as the way to solve problems (with some glaring exceptions we're all aware of), and that is a very admirable thing. That being said, The Doctor being a woman doesn't mean she can't be a role model to young boys either, so there's that criticism addressed up front.

At the time, I tried to like Series 11, and really wanted this fresh new look/take on Doctor Who to be something nice. I liked the Twelfth Doctor with Capaldi, but wasn't a huge fan of Moffat by the end, and I think it's revisionist history to say he was ever beloved. I remember people being really tired of him by the end of 7 years on the show, myself included. Chibnall's episode in prior years had never been my favourite, but I watched Broadchurch Series 1 and 2 as they came out, and was gobsmacked at how great they were, and was hoping for that quality in Doctor Who. I was riding high on copium. I wanted to like the series by the guy who wrote Broadchurch, I wanted to like the first series with a female Doctor, I wanted them to prove all the people calling it woke wrong, I wanted a different TARDIS dynamic to work, a bigger crew might lead to more interesting stories.

By mid 2019, I'd accepted that I hated the series. Unfocused and without anything to say, the series was this hollow shell of a TV show that looked glossy, but had lost any of the charm of the series I'd watched weekly since 2005. I thought maybe I'd grown up, that maybe I wasn't connecting with the show like I used to because I'd just reached my 20s. Turns out a lot of other people felt the same way. Again, it wasn't that the show "went woke and went broke", no, it was that the writing was so incredibly bad and the main companions in the show were as deep as a puddle, and the acting across the board (with only a few exceptions) was incredibly bland and uninteresting. Even Jodie, whom I didn't hate, felt like there wasn't any actual characterisation for her Doctor, very little other than her saying "Oh" or "fam". Scripts seem like they were wanting to criticise aspects of society, and yet seemingly endorsed the very systems they were attempting to criticise (I think you can guess which episode I'm talking about there). Even the 'inclusion' for the era felt weak, with messages being hammered home or pushed to the side, at times preaching about a subject that it really felt like the writers knew nothing about. I actually want stories to be inclusive, but inclusion needs to be just that, inclusive, not have queer people play insignificant roles in a plot other than to say "I'm gay" and then used as a shield for someone's genuine criticism of the show (a tactic used by high level executive, producers and writers, and in turn genuinely brainless people on the internet in the mid-late 2010s when criticising something).

I remembered all this, I talked about it with friends in the years since, and none of us liked the series. So now, I got to come back to see it with fresher, older eyes in my late 20s.

As of right now I still have all those same problems with the show. I've seen revisionist history online, people gassing up this era of the show, saying they wanted a return to form, back to this era of the show. I can't understand why. Maybe they were literal children when they watched it, but even when I watched Series 1-3, I saw how cheaply made those series were, and I remember not liking certain episodes because they had bad scripts and bad ideas. Series 11 is an action-adventure show that seems to be written and produced by people who have no idea what action means, and it seems like the scripts are written by people who are genuine amateurs. The amount of exposition and lack of any exciting filmmaking in the episodes is astounding, with Arachnids in the UK being the single worst example of everything wrong with the series. The episode is about giant spiders attacking and eating people, and yet there's very little actual action in the series, and you have characters standing around explaining everything that's happening in dull, incredibly literal ways that feel wooden and lifeless. Gone are the chaotic and frantic words that Moffat would write, or the charming and funny characters of RTD1, instead, we have exposition machines moving through 50-minute episodes. Also, gone are the people like Rachal Talalay, Eros Lyn and Graeme Harper, people who know how to work behind the camera to create interesting blocking in scenes and find the view that no one else could.

Series 11 really feels like the camera POV is more interested in looking at the characters of The Doctor, Ryan Graham and Yaz more than the universe around them. So much of the camera work puts them in focus, and everything else is out of focus, like the F-stop is stuck at 1.4-2, and no one knows how to change it. We barely see these characters in the worlds they're visiting; rather, I have a feeling the big jump up in camera quality that happened from Series 10 to Series 11 means the production wanted to shoot everything "cinematically", but that no one actually knows what that means. These problems persist throughout the entire series. I'd say that Jamie Childs's episodes are some of the better-directed ones in the series, with Demons of the Punjab being one where a lot of the elements end up being far better than in other episodes, despite a few wooden scenes, mostly in the modern day with Yas and her granny. But as I said, Arachnids in the UK is bad in every way, and at times, it's so poorly made that it's almost unwatchably bad at times.

Since the beginning of NuWho, the companion(s) is/are somewhat of the main character(s) of the show, and that is kept the same for this series, but again, everything is flattened out to where it's uninteresting. I'm fine with the series final being more emotionally focused; in fact, I love that the ending of Series 9 is much more about the emotional connection of The Doctor and Clara, and while the universe is in peril, it ends up being somewhat secondary stakes to the story being told. The idea of Ryan and Graham coming face to face with their grief is a compelling story, but what happened? The Battle of Ranskoor Av Kolos is so unique in that it's able to be a fairly well directed episode with some pretty great CGI and incredible set design/lighting, and yet the script is one of the dullest of the entire show, going all the way back to the 60s (maybe only matched by The Web Planet, and even then, the concept there was interesting). Resolution is a little better in that it's a more emotional story that actually ties into the Dalek story that's being told, but then the early scenes of Ryan and his dad are some of the worst-written, worst-acted, and most difficult to watch scenes of the entire show.

One of the major problems for me in the series was just how uncreative anything in the episodes were. A sci-fi show should be exploring relatable topics in ways that push into the realms of scientific theory, and let's be honest, Doctor Who has always had an element of fantasy, so you can often go into that territory as well. I'm all for a series much more focused on new ideas and monsters rather than returning characters, but you have to actually fill the episodes with interesting ideas. What in series is actually new or interesting? This is obviously a lot more subjective, but I felt every piece of worldbuilding and concept they explored felt so incredibly dull and uninteresting to me. In previous eras, events and places would be mentioned, and I liked them; it made the universe feel big and genuine beyond the show we were seeing, but this series feels like The Doctor, or anyone else in the episode, was reciting from a history book whenever they talk about the wider universe. Alien species or creature is introduced, and The Doctor reads out a 50-100 word bio on them in flavour text dialogue that would be rejected as too bland if it were in a video game menu. Everything is exposition, every feels like it's telling you what's happening at all times, a trope much bigger than Doctor Who with TV being 'second screen viewing' now, rather than the main source of entertainment, but combined with the frankly shoddy and hollow writing, both conceptually and moment-to-moment, and you're let with bad ideas that are consistently telling you the very uninteresting things that are happening on screen.

TL;DR - It's not a good series, in fact, it might be the worse series of Doctor Who in the entire show, and it's not nostalgia talking to say that RTD's first series in 2005 is leagues ahead of this. Anyone who recommends this as an introduction to the show, or says that it's a good example of the show, or even that it's a well-made series, has no idea what they're talking about and just mindlessly consumes slop because they've been told to and refuse to criticise anything.

reddit.com
u/AlmostRandomNow — 2 months ago
▲ 2 r/Props

Looking for someone to make/design a crown for a stage play (UK ONLY)

I have no idea is a crown falls under props of costume. I'd appreciate if people could also point me to other places where I might get better success if you can't help.

Looking to make a Lovecraftian style crown for a production at the Edinburgh Fringe this year (2 months away).

I have very little experience sourcing props and costume and have no contacts who can do this kind of thing.

I'm on a budget, but I understand there is going to be a price for this.

If this isn't for this subreddit, then please direct me to elsewhere where I might find help.

EDIT: I should add, I'm not on Facebook for a number of reasons, so that will not be helpful.

reddit.com
u/AlmostRandomNow — 3 months ago