u/AnIsolatedMind

This moment exists in relationship with all objects and events, everywhere.

It is this simultaneity of consciousness that is the full content of our experience. The entire cosmos is there, whether or not we are aware of it.

It is impossible for a part to be separate from the whole. In our mental image, we construct separate objects in order to operate upon them symbolically. In our desire to not be alone, we commit ourselves to the isolated mind of communicable thought-space. Only the system of differentiated objects exists to us.

This is the conscious ego, split from the unconscious of simultaneity.

Unelaborated and unreduced, we move our eye to the periphery and feel the incredible immensity of everything that ever exists and has existed. It is only in the absolute relation that there is anything at all.

Simultaneous, nothing is happening or ever has happened. All time and space are present always, like an immense and inalienable light. The pure bliss of Being.

And yet there is also within this a process unfolding. There is becoming, a coming to understand, in the unfolding particulars of this Being.

This process is exactly as it is right now, complete in-itself, and paradoxically becoming something more. Both of these sides can't be separated. The absolute lives in a relative body, the body is enlivened by the absolute.

To separate nonduality from duality is a project that can only exist in constructed image. The whole of this unfolding reality must be pushed into the unconscious so that it retains an image of ideal perfection.

But the process of reality continues unnoticed, a pressure building beneath a mind which has reduced reality to pure abstraction.

The perfect ideal is in image only; the cosmos conspires to release us from this ignorance. Nature demands to be loved, to be experienced fully, to be known in all relations. Our evolution as a species is a movement of God coming to know itself with no end point.

We feel happier and more intrinsically satisfied in nondual process because we are able to more fluidly and without identification move energy where it needs to go in the body-system. Parts of our body-mind are starved of energy, some are stuffed, and we experience these sensations as painful, with a vague sense that something isn't right and a desire to fix it. Parts we have identified with have their idea of how to fix the system, but often in ways that reinforce the uneven distribution of energy. We are able to recognize in full awareness the process of these parts and therefore let in the influence of what naturally arises. This is the influence of the Self which knows how to move towards equilibrium non-linearly, and it is allowed to do so when liberated from limiting rules and the logic of meaning.

The movement of the Self, as an intuition towards progressive equilibrium, not dissociated from the immediate organization of energy in phenomenological experience, is leading us towards greater organized complexity; i.e. the energy system leads towards its own optimization, wherein the Self is more free to move, the parts less fixated, the relationships more secure, presence more transparent. This is the overall goal of the soul, using the vessel that is the content of our mind and body. While every part has their own energy-reinforcing logic, the soul follows its own Logic transcendent to any one part alone, progressively liberating us from the pain of egoic leadership.

Re-read the posts here as if OP was really hyped on their vision to increase human suffering but they didn't have the power or the resources to make it happen, so they posted it here instead for a cheap laugh. They would have done it if they had the connections. When you give them upvotes they feel more confident in themselves and start taking action toward their misanthropic goals. Don't enable them.

Why go door to door when you can go gene to gene? We are all God's children, after all. (Don't mind me I'm ignorant)

We are born into this world as animal, raised to be human. In the process, the animal in us is devalued and dissociated from, built on an unquestioned assumption in the superiority of the human. But "the human" is the construct which justifies the subjugation of the animal; we do not have to give the animal freedom, consideration, or full subjectivity. We allow ourselves to neglect the animal, to use it for our purpose, to eat it.

But the animal is our very own body, extending out into the distant past prior to this lifetime. We retain the unquestioned superiority of the human and direct it towards the animal in ourselves and in others; the body is subjugated unquestionably by the mind, to its own detriment. We are consciously farmer but unconsciously farmed, self-devouring in our nature.

The compassion we can give toward the human is that without this master/slave dialectic between the mind and its own body, there is no emergence of the human to begin with. However, left at this stage without confronting the subjugated animal, we retain a fracture that runs throughout the individual and society. We have to retain our superiority through a lie, and that lie keeps the individual as body-mind fragile and untethered. The question of whether or not to eat meat or participate in the use of animal products isn't surface-level political opinion or even a matter of disembodied ethics, it is a core psychological complex which began at the very beginning of our lives, when we had to navigate the contradiction of becoming-human in an animal body. We had to choose the fragmentation of mind and body in order to become the farmer and not the farmed --but we experienced fully the trauma of being subjugated, devalued, and unseen in that process.

Beyond this recognition, we might recognize further that we are animal, and that it is in our animal nature to discriminate, to be violent, to devour one another. But only first through examining the dissociation can we sit in the full tension of the human-animal paradox without bypassing it, and to have freedom of choice over a compulsive instinct. I believe a good place to start with this is with the question of whether or not to eat meat; not just as a cognitive exercise to re-enforce a position, but with the possibility of actually examining the unconscious process that arises around this question. What arises somatically and symbolically; where does that line of inquiry take us?