I came up with a grounding exercise which I want yall to scrutinize or add onto. I call it "What if consequences don't apply"
**A quick disclaimer**
Psychology isn't my field and what I'm gonna say is only based off of my research and personal experience
With that out of the way, let me explain the exercise.
**Problem with existing techniques**
The goal of grounding exercises is to relate to reality in a way which is more realistic, but I feel like exercises like 5-4-3-2-1 isn't very flexible and doesn't do justice to how much a person can possibly feel grounded. Free form journaling is much more flexible but the only problem is that it makes the person much more prone to intellectualization.
**My exercise**
This is a journaling exercise where we write down what is bothering us right now and what are the consequences if the problem is not solved. If there are no consequences, then we'll realize that this wasn't a problem in the first place and we'll feel more grounded. For example, if I fail in a class, then why should I care if there are somehow no consequences. Finally we ask ourselves if we'd still care if these consequences don't apply. This means for example, what if I get a good enough job without passing those classes.
If you'd still care, then find out what are the other consequences you might be missing out. By this time tho, you'd feel much more grounded. However, If you won't care, then tell yourself, for example, "Failing the class isn't the problem but possibility of loosing a good job prospect in the future is the problem".
Then repeat the same exercise where now, the things that are bothering you are the consequences and not the original problem.
**Why I think this would work**
I feel like this exercise reduces the risk of intellectualization by ruling out every consequences that aren't actually relevant. Another benefit of this exercise is that the deeper you go, the more you'd discover what you actually value and truly care about.