I'm new, still on chapter 1. I feel like this ability makes boss battles in this so much easier and not necessarily in a good way.
The data provided:
P true, Q true, ¬p?q true
P true, Q false, ¬p?q false
P false, Q true ¬p?q true
P false, Q false, ¬p?q false
For a while I've had this idea that if you flipped a coin - which one would assume to have a 50/50 chance of landing on either heads or tails - and the coin ends up landing on heads, then surely that means, by virtue that the coin *did* ultimately land on heads, that it could only *ever* have landed on heads, and could never have landed on tails.
I believe that the idea that I'm describing is not fatalism. Fatalism suggests that there is a grander esoteric force necessitating that all things be the way they are. My idea is that all things must be the way they are as an entailment from the fact that they are.
Is there a term for this kind of idea? And is it fallacious and if so why?
How do I improve?