
Hexwraiths/black knights
Are these the same models as the AoS barrow knights ?

Are these the same models as the AoS barrow knights ?
First of all, I'm trying to interpret the rules, not what I want, not what I think it should be played (rules as written, RAW). This is an effort to integrate all the rules and FAQs. Poke my argument, but based on rules and references, not with your free interpretation or wishes (quick block if you don't adhere to this).
*EDIT after debating with you guys added at the bottom. Don't get mad before reading the resolution (I actually changed my mind).
Starting with the easiest example a range unit shoots a unit of 3 trolls (3W each). The sequence by the rules is the following:
Rulebook, p. 136
In 3 > Rolls to hit, wound and saving throws are taken (with the chance of rolling in batches). Once the saves are not successful they are realized as UNSAVED WOUNDS.
In 4 > Unsaved wounds are allocated to the unit and realized in to Lost Wounds
Example: the shooting generated 15 UNSAVED WOUNDS. Only 9 (3W per troll) can be lost, since you can not loose more W than a model have. (as in Rules page.143: A model cannot suffer more wounds that is in its profile. Should a model do so, it dies instantly and any excess wounds are wasted.)
So there are only 9 LOST WOUNDS (3 per troll).
Then REGENERATION triggers:
REGEN happens immediately after a WOUND IS LOST, not after an UNSAVED WOUND.
You roll total of 9 regens. The other 6 out of the 15 UNSAVED WOUNDS were never LOST WOUNDS. Not subject to regen. You roll the 9 sequentially and having in mind Rules page.102 - Multiple Wounds Models: Wounds are lost by a single model until its Wounds characteristic is reduced to zero. Wounds are then lost by the next model, and so on.
FAQ 1.5.3.
Q: Can a model make more Regen saves than it has Wounds remaining on its profile?
A:No, When a model makes a Regen saves, it makes one save for each Wound Lost.
This to me is just clarifying exactly that. The distinction between WOUND LOST and UNSAVED WOUNDS. You take regen saves only to WOUND LOSTS, and the max is how many wounds you have when the attack started.
Change my mind (based on rules and references).
EDIT:
CONCLUSION - My mistake was to include a rule that applies only to Multiple Wounds to 15 instances of single attacks in my example. RESOLUTION: I changed my mind.
SUMMARY AFTER DISCUSSION
For SHOOTING (single W attacks), 15 unsaved shots will generate 15 lost wounds in the 3 trolls (3W each), that would have to roll 15 regens one by one.
For SHOOTING with MULTIPLE WOUNDS weapons: If it was a cannonball (rolling a 6 in multiple wounds roll) to a single troll. 1 unsaved wound multiplied by 6. Only 3W can be lost (based on multiple wounds rule page 143), so cap at 3 lost wounds. You roll max 3 regens as by faq 1.5.3. clarification. Just need one successful Regen for the troll to be alive.
For COMBAT, if you consider single W attacks nothing changes. If your enemy succeeded with 15 unsaved wounds, you roll 15 Regens in your trolls.
For COMBAT with MULTIPLE WOUNDS weapons, you apply again a cap of the Regens you take. I.e. oger blade can farm only 3 CR killing a troll. A troll successfully Regen 1 of 3 Regens roll will be alive.
For COMBAT in a CHALLENGE against for example a treekin elder champion:
Hi everyone,
I have learnt that the chance of an outcome when gambling is independent of the events that preceded them. For example, if you are gambling in roulette to black, it doesn't matter how many times red showed in the previous rounds. You don't have more chances of black to happen. However, this is really counterintuitive. Can someone explain to me why? Why is a bad idea to wait until red shows up a bunch of times in a row to bet to black? It looks to me that a string of more than 6 or 7 or 8 times of red is low probability.
I hope I explained my mind all right.
Cheers,
So, can I fit Trugg in a 100mm x 60mm to proxy it as a Troll Hag? Thanks