IS 40k strategy too complicated and deep to discuss casually? In other words, is general advice is too hard to give without every bit of context possible.
First, some context
So I help run a wargaming club, and we play a bunch of different games. I often get a very surface-level understanding of many games. But, I don't always have the time to drill down into a game's mechanics. Furthermore, the club has house armies made of odds and ends, donated stuff, or part of combat patrols, etc., etc.
So I make a list for these armies, trying to make a loner army with a somewhat coherent strategy, maybe not a good one, but a coherent one with what we have. So new folks can see how certain synergies work, and this unit is good vs this, or this unit is good at this job, etc., etc.
But since I'm not an expert, I have often turned to Reddit and other forums to ask advice to help with an x hodge podge list around 1200 points or so to see what's the best way to run it.
I almost never receive that info. The advice I get is what units I should have in the list instead, or that the list is bad for x reason, or nothing at all.
So my question is, is 40k too complicated or nuanced for some casual reading of a Reddit or forum post to weigh in constructively? Is the only way someone could give good info if they know the exact match-up and set up of the board? Because what I am looking for is general advice, like make sure you lead with the meltas first, or take this detachment to get the most out of x unit. I often don't find this lack of information exchange for other games the club plays, so what's up with 40k?