u/BagOnuts

Anyone have recommendations for a Tonneau hard-cover? Want something that is easy to fold back to open the trunk as well.

North Carolina has just six months to implement new Medicaid eligibility requirements after receiving final guidance this month. Implementing new federal work requirements and strict state mandates will be costly for the state and could lead to thousands losing health coverage.

More than 3 million North Carolinians rely on Medicaid. But according to Melanie Bush, deputy secretary for North Carolina Medicaid, an upwards of 255,000 of them who access Medicaid through expansion could lose health coverage when new federal work requirements from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act go into effect on Jan. 1.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services published its Medicaid eligibility requirements on June 1, giving states just months to create new systems and train staff to accommodate the new work requirements. The CMS work requirements were altered from those that appeared in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, halting some of the progress NCDHHS had already made to meet federal compliance.

Bush said in an interview with The N&O that she fears the new requirements are too complex and will leave people unsure about their coverage.
“This is the biggest change to Medicaid eligibility ever,” Bush said. “It is incredibly confusing, and it is frustrating how confusing it’s going to be.

There are going to be people who think that they have to go to work. There are going to be people who think that they’re exempt from work.”
Medicaid is supported from federal and state funds. Currently, working is not an eligibility requirement in North Carolina.

Medicaid enrollees will have to prove that they are working, volunteering or attending school for a minimum of 80 hours a month to keep their coverage. They can also combine hours from the different activities.

Who’s exempt from working under Medicaid?

Medicaid enrollees who fall under one of several classifications could be exempt from working, including medically frailty. Currently, NCDHHS determines medical frailty using clinical data.

But under the new law, an individual’s capacity to work would be decided based on whether the state determines that their medical condition prevents them from working, Bush said.

“We ... were not necessarily considering medical frailty to be necessarily defined by the ability to work. We were going to use a lot of diagnosis codes for things that we would consider someone medically frail and that would exempt them from work requirements,” Bush said.

This new method of verifying someone’s capacity to work has required the state to develop new systems that incorporate more automated data to help determine eligibility, Bush said. This infrastructure would cost the state tens of millions of dollars, The N&O previously reported.

The White House said that changing requirements to the nation’s healthcare assistance program would eliminate “waste, fraud, and abuse.”
Lucy Dagneau, senior director of state and local campaigns at the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, said she’s concerned that states across the country are forced to rush implementation, which may cause some people to fall through the cracks.

Bush expects that the state will meet federal compliance by the January deadline but said, “we would love more time.”

More state mandates in NC, hopes for funding

North Carolina’s legislature passed a billto fund Medicaid through the end of June to complete the fiscal year. But lawmakers also mirrored some of the language of new federal Medicaid requirements in the bill and added stricter mandates on top of the federal demands.

One of the costliest requirements is that NCDHHS must verify each Medicaid enrollees’ eligibility monthly, rather than quarterly as the state has been doing. Federal requirements call for monthly documentation of work requirements to be checked at least every six months.This, Bush said, would “quadruple” social service workers’ workload.

She worries that county social service workers may not be prepared in time for the changes because the state has had to wait on the release of the final federal requirements to create training materials. Bush said that although the legislature gave NCDHHS the funds to implement these systems and hire more staff, she worries that counties may not be able to hire staff fast enough to keep up with the workload that comes with the new mandates.

“We have been talking with legislators about our concerns about that provision specifically,” Bush said. “We’re trying to educate our members to help them understand that it would be incredibly costly to do on a monthly basis and that it would probably result in a backlog of redeterminations which would end up costing the state more money.”

Dagneau said that North Carolina is among few states that have mimicked new federal Medicaid laws in state legislation, which she said is “damaging.”

“Enrollees (in North Carolina) are going to struggle more than enrollees in other states because North Carolina chose to require some policies that are even more burdensome than we’re seeing nationwide,” Dagneau said.

Though lawmakers have only passed a funding package for Medicaid until the end of the month, Bush said that she is optimistic that Medicaid will be sufficiently funded in the state’s upcoming budget.

The Republican-controlled state legislature has yet to pass its nearly one-year overdue comprehensive state budget, which is expected to contain Medicaid funding.

“I think that from what I’ve heard in my discussions with lawmakers, they are committed to passing a budget for Medicaid and for the entirety of state government,” Bush said. “I think they understand what our needs are, and they have been very receptive to understanding … the implications if it’s not passed again like it was last year.”

Informing Medicaid recipients about changes

Lori Kelley, 59, is a Medicaid enrollee who lives in Harrisburg who said that she is unclear on where she’ll stand come January. Kelley said that because much of her work is seasonal, she’s unsure if she’ll meet the requirements, though she works at least 20 hours a week when she does have work.

To prevent widespread confusion, Bush said that NCDHHS hopes to begin communicating information about the changes “as soon as possible” to prevent confusion.

“I don’t really understand how all this is going to work,” Kelley said. “It’s not like they provide you with a liaison that sits you down that says, ‘Okay, so here’s how it’s going to change. Here’s what you need to do.’ You pretty much need to navigate it for yourself.”

Kelley said that finding work is difficult because she must rule out any roles that require using a computer because of her vision loss. This limits her primarily to manual labor jobs, which has become difficult as she continues to age with arthritis, she said. Kelley also has resistant hypertension and said that she likely wouldn’t have discovered her condition without Medicaid.

NCDHHS is creating a stakeholder toolkit to share with enrollees, advocacy groups and other stakeholders, Bush said. Disseminating information using these community resources has brought them success in this past during Medicaid expansion and continuous coverage unwinding.

Edit- since this seems to keep getting brought up, the following post was compiled with assistance from AI for organization and clarity. I’m not a bot and have been posting to this sub for years. Feel free to look at my account history for validation.

——

I spent some time reviewing Cary’s proposed FY2027 budget and the town’s public explanation for the increases. Here’s a high-level breakdown for anyone trying to understand what’s changing, why it’s happening, and what it may mean for homeowners.

The big headline is that Cary is proposing a property tax increase, along with smaller increases to solid waste and utility fees. The town is framing this budget around three major needs: public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and long-term capital investment.

What is changing?

The proposed property tax rate would increase from 34 cents to 37.75 cents per $100 of assessed value. That is a 3.75-cent increase.
For homeowners, that would roughly mean:

- A $400,000 home: about $150 more per year
- A $500,000 home: about $187.50 more per year
- A $600,000 home: about $225 more per year
- A $700,000 home: about $262.50 more per year

So for many households, the property tax increase may land somewhere around $12–$22 more per month, depending on assessed value.

There are also proposed fee increases:

- Solid waste/recycling would increase from $26/month to $28/month
- Utility base rates would increase by about 4%, estimated at around $3.08/month for a typical household

Why is Cary proposing the increase?

Based on the town’s own materials, the largest justification is public safety.

The proposed budget includes significant new public safety investments, including additional police officers, 911 operators, firefighters, and planning/design work for future fire stations, particularly as growth continues in western Cary.
The town has described this as one of the largest public safety investments Cary has made in decades.

The other major reason is infrastructure. Cary is not just funding new projects; a large portion of the capital budget is aimed at maintaining existing infrastructure like parks, streets, facilities, and other community assets. In other words, part of this budget is about keeping up with the town’s current service level rather than only adding new things.

There is also a financial accountability component. After recent leadership changes and scrutiny around town management, the budget includes added finance-related capacity to improve oversight, controls, and financial management.

Didn’t Cary already cut the budget?

According to the town, yes. Cary has said departments reduced their original budget requests by more than $60 million before the recommended budget was presented.
That is important context because the town’s position is essentially: even after cutting requests, the remaining needs still require additional recurring revenue.

What happens if taxes don’t go up?

The town does not seem to be saying services would immediately collapse. The more realistic consequence appears to be that Cary would have to delay, reduce, or stretch out some of the planned investments.

That could mean slower hiring for public safety positions, delays in fire station planning, more deferred maintenance, or pushing costs into future budget years.

So the question is less “do we need any of this?” and more “do we pay for it now, reduce the scope, or defer it and potentially deal with higher costs later?”

My property taxes already went up after the reassessment. Why should Cary raise the rate again?

Many homeowners are not looking at this proposed increase in isolation. They are looking at it after a county reassessment that already increased taxable property values, which means many residents are already paying more than they were a few years ago.

So yes, affordability matters. Cary should be expected to justify every dollar of this increase clearly.

That said, the town’s argument seems to be that the need did not go away just because property values went up. Cary is still facing growth-related demands, rising operating costs, public safety staffing needs, infrastructure maintenance, and future fire/911 capacity needs. If those items are not funded now, the alternative is not necessarily “no cost.” It may mean delayed hiring, delayed maintenance, slower public safety expansion, or higher costs later.

I think the better way to frame the question is not simply: “Can residents afford a tax increase?” It’s “Can Cary afford to defer these investments without creating bigger problems later?”

My takeaway

This budget is not just a simple cost-of-living increase. It looks like Cary is trying to make a deliberate investment in public safety staffing, fire/911 capacity, infrastructure maintenance, and financial controls.

For homeowners, the increase is real but not enormous on a monthly basis. The bigger question is whether residents agree with the town’s priorities and timing.

Personally, I think the most important things to watch are:

- Whether the new public safety positions are clearly tied to growth and response needs
- Whether infrastructure spending is focused on maintenance and essential services
Whether the town follows through on stronger financial oversight
- Whether future budget years continue to require increases, since Cary has described this as part of a multi-year approach
- The budget is still going through the public process, so residents should review the town’s materials and meeting discussions directly if they want the full context.

Despite Trump’s historically low approval rating, Thomas Massie - a popular Kentucky Republican congressman who has opposed Trump on the Epstein files and the war in Iran - has been unseated by Trump’s hand-picked rubber-stamp nobody….

Massie voted with the GOP over 90% of the time, but Trump still painted a target on his back, calling him a “traitor” for his refusal to follow in lock-step with the president. Does this show us that, despite Trump’s low approval rating, he still controls the GOP base? Does this prove that GOP = Trump, and there is no room for debate? If so, how will this impact the midterm elections?

$75 for general parking at conference finals. $57 (after fees) if you prepay.

Absolutely ridiculous. Lenovo has over 8,000 parking spaces. They got to be making over $500,000 on parking alone....