My unpopular (?) rad-fem opinions that no one asked for.
The 'papa ki pari' stereotype was started by men who weren't loved properly by their fathers to shame girls who were loved properly by their fathers.
No religion truly favors women.
Even if a victim didn't physically resist a r@pe, it should not be a factor in deciding if she "wanted" it. In dangerous situations, our mind goes into survival mode and thus, its primary task becomes to keep us alive. For eg, in robbery cases, we are often told that the smartest move is to give everything to robbers and get out of there safely. then why does this criteria changes when it comes to r@pe?
although this goes for everybody, but specially in cases of minors, r@pe is r@pe even if the minor - danced in a certain way, flirted first or back, initiated a sexual act, or were wearing a certain outfit. if they are a minor. it does NOT matter and if you proceed with sexual act, YOU ARE A R@PIST.
SW is not feminist, arguing that women should be able to sell their bodies is a fragile attempt to hide the argument that men should be able to buy their bodies.
Cosmetic surgeries are not feminist.
Women should be encouraged to but should not be blamed if they are not able to rebel against their families if they are too strict and hinder their development like stopping their education, forceful marriages, or simply not allowing them to wear what they want.