u/Busy-Tomatillo-4965

Would it be possible to add a way to skip/cancel only the current image generation while a script is running, without stopping the whole script?

For example, if a script is generating 20 images and I’m currently on image 6, I might see that the result is going in a bad direction and want to discard it. Ideally, I could press something like “Skip” and have the script immediately move on to image 7.

Currently, as far as I understand it, stopping the generation also stops the script, which means I have to either let the unwanted image finish or stop everything and restart.

I think this could be particularly useful for scripts that generate batches of images or iterate through different prompts/parameters.

I’m not sure whether this is technically possible with the current scripting architecture, but it would be a really useful feature.

One area that I think Draw Things could improve significantly is image management.

When generating hundreds of images with a script, cleaning up the results becomes unnecessarily slow. Currently, you have to click each image individually and delete them one by one with the mouse.

It would be a huge quality of life improvement to support:

-Multi-selection (Shift/Cmd-click).

-Standard keyboard shortcuts (Cmd+A, Delete, etc.).

-Bulk delete for selected images.

The generation workflow is already excellent, but managing large batches is much more time consuming than it should be. Anyone who uses scripts or performs large parameter sweeps has probably run into this issue.

I’ve been testing Ideogram 4 (6-bit) in Draw Things, and with completely normal SFW prompts I keep getting this. Almost every generation ends up blocked by the safety filter, even though there’s nothing remotely NSFW in the prompt. Is anyone else seeing the same behavior?

https://preview.redd.it/hipvryeit5eh1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=1f4a24a160155b4bcacce75265767e5a3ce6cd76

https://preview.redd.it/kz8e4ijf5lbh1.png?width=1514&format=png&auto=webp&s=98261980bac86c2983e70306882081936289108e

A Spanish advocacy organization recently published a list of 40 indicators that demonstrate structural discrimination against men.

The indicators are grouped into several recurring themes:

• Different legal treatment for men and women in domestic violence legislation, including sentencing, pretrial measures, and presumptions in criminal proceedings.

• Underrecognition of male victims of domestic and sexual violence, with fewer dedicated services, shelters, and public awareness campaigns.

• Family court issues, such as child custody, parental alienation debates, and the consequences of allegations during divorce proceedings.

• Government funding and institutional programs that are largely directed toward women’s issues, while comparable initiatives for men are limited or absent.

• Educational and media narratives that portray men primarily as perpetrators while overlooking male vulnerabilities.

• Health disparities, including suicide, workplace fatalities, homelessness, addiction, and lower life expectancy, which receive comparatively little policy attention.

• Military service, retirement age in some countries, dangerous occupations, and other areas where men disproportionately bear certain obligations or risks.

The broader argument is not that women do not face genuine disadvantages, but that gender equality should also address problems that disproportionately affect men, especially where law or public policy may treat the sexes differently.

40 Indicators of Structural Discrimination Against Men

https://preview.redd.it/e8egzyb82gbh1.png?width=1956&format=png&auto=webp&s=c146c24d1879ee79b289f130a42526156c323bb1

This study suggests people may still evaluate similar behaviors differently depending on whether the user is male or female.

The authors found measurable differences in disgust ratings, with male sextech users being judged more negatively in equivalent scenarios

https://preview.redd.it/fg8yb9qcjfbh1.png?width=1960&format=png&auto=webp&s=8f119954e9122173600f1c0b7d2cbe50fa74e8e2

https://preview.redd.it/2srtkpqcjfbh1.png?width=1564&format=png&auto=webp&s=2f973d6b4c1e6d50538cecef21c3e8ac59cb88f3

I think this kind of argument removes women’s agency. If a woman thinks another woman is overweight, why must that judgment automatically be interpreted as a man “looking through her head”? Aren't women capable of forming their own opinions, including critical ones, without being reduced to passive vessels of male influence.

If women praise each other’s appearance, is that also men speaking through them, or does female agency only disappear when the opinion is negative?.

It's contradictory to argue that women need to be recognized as fully autonomous individuals while simultaneously claiming that their own thoughts are merely men speaking through them. Either women have agency, or they don’t. You can’t champion one principle and abandon it whenever women express opinions that feminism finds inconvenient.

For those outside Spain, Ana Redondo is Spain’s Minister of Equality and a member of the ruling Socialist Party (PSOE), which governs in coalition with several left wing parties.

She recently described men and women as radically different “species” and argued that men need to “evolve” socially and emotionally.

I think this matters for men’s rights because these statements come from the government official responsible for equality policy. When public institutions portray men as a class that needs to be corrected, educated, or morally improved, it reinforces negative stereotypes about men rather than treating them as individuals.

Regardless of political views, should a Minister of Equality be framing one sex as needing to evolve while the other is implicitly presented as the model to follow? What impact does this have on public perceptions of men and on policies that affect them?

https://preview.redd.it/7txsnh98lzah1.png?width=1668&format=png&auto=webp&s=a0bb77ad605a5566a3f2ba106810cdfd06cb3748

Hi everyone,

I’m using an iPhone 11 Pro Max running iOS 26 and the latest version of Halide Mark III.

The main (wide) camera and the telephoto camera work without any issues. However, every time I switch to the ultra wide camera (0.5x), Halide crashes and closes immediately.

I’ve already tried restarting the phone and reinstalling the app, but the problem persists.

Before I spend more time troubleshooting, I’d like to know:

Is the ultra wide camera officially supported on the iPhone 11 Pro Max in the latest version of Halide Mark III?

Can anyone else with an iPhone 11 Pro Max and iOS 26 reproduce this issue?

Is this a known bug, or is it likely something specific to my device?

For reference:

Device: iPhone 11 Pro Max

iOS version: iOS 26

App: Halide Mark III (latest version)

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

One thing I really appreciate about the latest Crosspoint firmware betas for the XTEInk 3 and XTEInk 4 is the ability to install custom fonts.

For people with presbyopia or difficulty reading small text up close, something that eventually affects almost everyone with age, this is genuinely helpful. Being able to install larger or more readable fonts can make reading books comfortable again without constantly needing glasses.

However, there is still one major accessibility issue: the menu text is extremely small.

You can make books readable thanks to custom fonts, but navigating the menus can still be almost impossible without glasses. In practice, this means the reading experience improves a lot, but the device interface itself remains difficult to use.

I would love to see accessibility options added for the UI itself, especially adjustable menu font sizes or a general interface scaling option. I think this would make the devices much more usable for people with near vision problems and older users overall.

The custom font support is already a fantastic step in the right direction. UI accessibility would complete it.