r/MensRights

. . .b/c she MAY HAVE had postpartum depression; all while Twitter & TikTok blame / lecture men on why we’re still wrong somehow. Lmbo. . . Guys, refuse to be gaslit. It’s the Twilight Zone out here. 

actual quotes:
“. . .women who kill their own kids are not a threat to others. But men aren’t rational, they just want to punish her because their feelings demand it. Men should not be in charge.” —@RealDianeYap

“. . .they came to that home and found THREE dead children, a woman near death, and the husband unscathed and they believe THE MAN?!?!” —@_ayandamay

“Whatever happens in the Lindsey Clancy trial, a main conversation we need to be having is why the hell men are still going on with their lives like their wives aren’t struggling? . . .Allowing your wife to go through that while your life continues is abuse.” —@hell_line0

“Women don’t strangle. . . They poison or drown them. . .” — actress Lisa Rinna (claiming her & her therapist agreed on this during her last session)

Has anyone seen the advertisement of Hims products?

For those who don’t know, a woman comes on screen and says “Guys, if you’re still balding in 2026, what are you doing??”. I skip after this point because I find it deeply offensive and disturbing and disrespectful.

First of all, they are blaming men for something that they absolutely have no control over it.

Second, they are employing women to shame men into buying their products. It’s the same thing as white roses or something from world war era. Why is the sexuality always being used to “subtly” influence men?

Imagine if someone made an ad with a man talking about “Gals, if you are still fat in 2026, what are you doing?”. All hell will break loose. But when it’s men shaming, no one bats an eye.

I don’t know why but my blood pressure rises every time it is played. I have reported it to Google but doubt anything would happen.

Rest assured, I am never ever buying absolutely any product from this company.

Is it just me who gets so angry with this ad??

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v-hIVnmUdXM&pp=2AEAkAIB

Both of them are obsessed with Individual responsibility under a regime of equality of opportunity. Are they right? They basically believe that you have to guarantee some (Rawls_like) justice in opportunity with a mostly free society otherwise.

They completely agree with first wave and mostly reject second wave feminism.

Please critique and point out fallacies in the general argument. Just looking for personal thoughts in case I'm missing something and feminist social constructivism (women are sociologically oppressed in patriarchy) of society actually makes sense to you.

If some Feminist literature can actually survive this critique, please recommend.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v-hIVnmUdXM&pp=2AEAkAIB

https://www.scrippsnews.com/us-news/study-shows-an-increasing-number-of-young-men-are-single

TLDR: Lindsay Clancy supporters are harming and doxing her ex husband based on their unruly and unhinged claim, despite her confessing to killing her three children and other evidences stacked against her. They are shifting the blame towards her ex. They need to be taken to court imo.

If you are following the Lindsay Clancy case or if you heard it from social media due to the current hype, it’s essentially another Andrea Yates case where a woman accused of killing her 3 kids, is not pleading a not guilty due to insanity case. She has confessed and admitted to killing her 3 children. She claims she had postpartum psychosis which was left undiagnosed by her providers. At the time, she was married to Patrick Clancy, a sales rep.

People tend to have a mixed reaction of whether she should get locked up and throw away the keys, or she should be checked in a mental institution for the rest of her life. Either way, it seems like the greater discussion should steer towards our health care.

Here is an exact timeline of the events transpired when LC had committed familicide:

• ~5:15 p.m. — Lindsay asks Patrick to pick up takeout from ThreeV restaurant in Plymouth and medication (stool softener) from CVS for Cora. He leaves the house, telling the kids he will be right back.

• 5:32 p.m. — Surveillance shows Patrick entering the CVS on Summer Street in Kingston. He goes to the children’s medication aisle.

• 5:33–5:34 p.m. — He calls Lindsay; she does not answer. She calls back roughly a minute later. The call lasts about 14 seconds. He confirms the medication; she sounds busy but the conversation is otherwise normal.

• 5:37 p.m. — Patrick leaves CVS.

• 5:54 p.m. — Surveillance shows him at ThreeV. He pays for the order and leaves within a minute.

• ~6:09–6:11 p.m. — Patrick arrives home to silence. The upstairs bedroom door is locked. He gets it open, sees blood on the floor and an open window, runs outside, finds Lindsay injured on the ground, and calls 911. While still on the line he discovers the children in the basement.

He was gone for roughly 50–55 minutes. Every stop is corroborated by independent records. The killings occurred while he was on that documented errand. This timeline is constructed from multiple news sources such as Boston herald, New York Post, NBC Boston, etc.

And this is what Patrick did in aftermath of this tragic event:

May 2023 — Approximately four months after the children’s deaths, Patrick relocates from Massachusetts to Manhattan (public records reported by the New York Post).

• By February 2024 — He is in a relationship with Dr. Rachel Danis, a reproductive endocrinologist and infertility specialist. Photos and accounts place them together from this period onward.

• 2025 — Rachel moves into Patrick’s Upper East Side apartment.

• April 2026 — The couple marry in a small ceremony at the Ladies Pavilion in Central Park, followed by a gathering with friends and family.

Despite a confession, and a stack of overwhelming evidence, these Lindsay Clancy’s online defenders have moved past arguing postpartum psychosis. A large group is now running a shared delusion that treats the surviving father as the real problem and subjects him and his new wife to harassment, doxxing, and false accusations. Furthermore, it has gone to a point where these incel women believe that Patrick and his current wife were having an affair around 2022-2023 and they were responsible for orchestrating the murder while doctoring an alibi for Patrick. I don’t even want to bother listing the Modus Operandi that supports the orchestration, because it’s simply absurd and out of reality.

I truly am frustrated about what the modern women have become, and the fact that that poor man can’t really do anything about this online harassment. I really believe Patrick could sue TikTok for encouraging defamation against his new family after this trail. That way TikTok could deplatform these incel deluded women.

I’m sorry for the long post but needed to vent.

We have all seen, with the war in Ukraine, how quickly feminist policies can erode and how movements advocating for equality can seemingly disappear when times get tough. As a young man living in Europe, I am fairly concerned that if this war escalates into a broader European conflict, the same thing could happen elsewhere. Men could be forced into conscription and potentially forced to die, while women will not face the same pressures. Of course, some women might voluntarily choose to serve their country, but they may not be compelled to do so. Meanwhile, women could continue with their education, careers, nights out, partying, and everyday lives while men of the same age are required to fight and die.

What are your thoughts on this? Do you think other European countries would draft women on the same basis as men if a major war broke out? Please feel free to add anything. I'm curious.

I read a lof of leftist/feminist content and this is a trend I've noticed in their circles - Anger at the justice system.

They think the justice system is against them and is biased to favor men.

There's a classic theory of how "majority of sexual assault goes unreported". And also anger at that assumption of innocence until proven guilty. They think that because the system deems an accused man as innocent, that means they think the woman is lying.

But I think that's a fair thing. You CANNOT trust people regardless of gender. You can only trust objective truth - evidence like CCTV footage, fingerprints, etc. Because even if a person is not deliberately lying, their memory of the incident might be completely screwed because memory works in a funny way. It reinforces your existing suspicions and the next time you "remember it", you actually remember a false version of the event that confirms your suspected theory.

They also don't see how such a system (of assumed guilt) can create all sorts of havoc. Where someone can easily land a person in jail just because of a false accusation. I used to live with a girl like this - who would threaten to falsely accuse me (and other guys in the building) of assault every time we had an argument with her.

I think all these is changing though. Because of all the pressure and shaming they're going through, they're beginning to change their rules and now blast people's private info all over the media just because of accusations. God forbid they don't "believe women" the moment they open their mouths. No evidence needed. A woman's word is now the supreme law of the land.

I'm from Canada, about to start junior year of high school. I'll be applying for pre med, I'm very interested in the future of anti-aging and senescence technology, particularly nano and gene therapy. As a backup I could work in research but I'd really like to be a physician, even if I'm in a research field, I think the thorough medical training you get in med school really boosts your ability to see things and put things together, and find new therapies.

Anyway, currently men are only 1/3 of med students here. Male applicants are only accepted at half the rate. The culture here against men is really bad, there's a lot I could talk about but specifically for education and medical school, people believe that men are less intelligent and capable of being doctors, that a man is naturally inferior at communicating with patients, etc. Just in general that men make worse doctors. So everyone defends men not getting into medical school. I've even had teachers say this.

There's a reddit page for people who want to study in Canada and it's honestly REALLY bad, it's very depressing. I would have thought that people smart enough to make it to medical school would be smart enough not to be sexist, but apparently not.

Anyway, I 100% plan on getting in and becoming a doctor anyway. As I said I'm interested in anti-aging, but a part of that interest is in the male life expectancy gap, I would love to start a specialty on men's health to increase our life expectancy and close the gap.

Anyway thanks! First post here.

This man was a saint to Lindsay.

Massachusetts has gone nuts over this one, but everything I’ve watched on this case has only made me believe more that Patrick went above and beyond for his wife. He financially supported the family when Lindsay had to take breaks from work. He moved his business to the house so that he could be around as much as possible to help her. He hired a MAID for further support when he wasn’t. He was also there for ER psychiatric emergencies and therapist appointments

And for all of that, millions of women are calling HIM the murderer

She has had a world class lawyer since the beginning. If he did it, we would have heard it in 2022

Patrick knows this, and many men also know this: he gave his life to that woman. This was not a momentary psychotic break. Lindsay was always this crazy, and Patrick revolved his life around supporting 3 children, and 1 adult child. You can see it in his eyes. He went through hell, and this is what he gets in return

Pay attention to the women identifying with Lindsay. They’re dangerous

So, we have achieved a society where women are not forced to get married out of high school and start birthing babies, and can now make decisions for themselves. But now men having free will is the problem?

That’s not even to mention the fact that at the earlier decades they are referencing a decent factory job could actually pay for a house and multiple kids.

Don’t check the comments unless you are ready to be frustrated.

There have been some posts about false ogling accusations at gyms, and I have a question about that. I don't use gyms, I exercise 6 days a week. But just do calisthenics in my apartment, or jog outside or ride my stationary bike.

So, my questions is this. What exactly goes on in these scenarios? I know how some women dress for gyms, seen it in videos. And even in places other than gyms. Super tight stretchy pants that look like they are painted on. (Side comment. What is the thinking of these companies that make such pants? I mean I don't see that kind of clothing for men. Is it they realize some women want to dress like street walkers, so lets make money on that?)

So I know how they dress. But what happens if you're not even noticing a woman but happen to be looking in her general area? Ok, so she makes a phony accusation to boost her ego. Then what happens. She accuses, you say I was just facing that way. Or you say I was just on the treadmill next to hers.

Then what happens? Do they just assume she's telling the truth and that you are lying? I mean by now everyone knows more than a few women pull this sh&t. Do they kick you out? Just suggest you move away from her so she'll stop moaning? What happens?

Bu clingy I'm referring to anxious attachment style. Many men even find ot desirable, unless it's extreme and some even find that desirable. But when it comes to men, being clingy is almost a death sentence for dating life.

I am a guy with anxious attachment and whenever I was with someone, I have to mask it. And eventually I let it express a little either conciously or unconsciously.

Women that I find attractive are usually highly self aware, emotionally mature and intelligent. And most importantly they are not misandrists and don't look down on men.

Yet, these women still lost attraction and respect towards me, when I told them about my anxious attachment or expressed my neediness. One even told me that this is a red flag she is most worried about in men.

When a man is needy towards women, they pathologize it, see it as "ick", immature behaviour, sign of desperation etc. For men you are either supposed to be avoidant, healthy, or mask the whole relationship and don't let her know about your. Which honestly I just wouldn't find satisfying at all, why would I want to be in relationship only to pretend I'm someone else?

I have never seen this double standard mentioned before. But it clearly points to the pattern where women have wide range of socially acceptable emotions and men have it very narrow.

In this particular case I don't know to which extent this is just cultural dehumanization. And to which women are just naturally wired to find any "weakness" in men icky.