u/Calm-Alarm7977

The government had filed NSA against Sonam Wangchuk. In the first hearing itself, the court said their translation of his speech felt inaccurate and asked for the full video and all evidence in the next session. So what did the government do? Withdrew the case.

If he is a terrorist, why is he sitting at Jantar Mantar and not in jail? And if he is not, who answers for destroying a credibility built over a whole lifetime, without proving a single thing?

File the case, ruin the name, take it back. That is not law, that is a tool to silence people.

And for those mocking his hunger strike, it is his own decision, not CJP's. His father once did the same. The man is risking his life for people he does not even know personally. Nonviolent protests have statistically succeeded more than violent ones, so if you cannot support him, at least stay silent instead of mocking.

https://standwithsonam.web.app

Over the past few days I’ve been working on this website. You enter a PIN code or your constituency name, and it automatically fetches your MP’s email address, name, constituency, attendance in the last Lok Sabha session, and the number of questions the MP asked in lok sabha 18 (All these details are scraped from sansad official website). Based on that information, the site formats an email to the MP, requesting that the MP visit Sonam sir and raise this issue in Parliament. I know these kinds of things don’t always work, but at least we can try.

Most token-saving tools focus on input tokens, but output tokens are usually priced higher, and edit-heavy agent sessions waste a lot of them on a specific pattern: to safely edit a file, the agent has to output the old code block plus the new code block, just so the harness can match and swap it in. That's safe (content-based matching means line drift doesn't cause a bad edit), but it means half the tokens going out are just the agent restating content it already read.

Plain line-range edits ("replace lines 50-60") avoid the resend but aren't safe, the moment any prior edit shifts the file, the range is stale and the agent edits the wrong lines.

My proposed fix keeps content-based safety without the resend:

1. On file read, return numbered lines + a blob id for that exact snapshot. 2. On edit, the agent sends only the blob id, a line range from that snapshot, and the new content. No old code required. 3. The system finds that range in the stored blob (not the live file), applies the change there, and three-way merges it into the current file (git's merge machinery handles this well).

Since the anchor is an immutable snapshot rather than the live file, the agent is replaying a known edit against a known point-in-time, and letting the merge reconcile it with whatever the file looks like now. Net effect: only new content is emitted as output tokens, instead of new + old.

Caveat: I built a CLI proof of concept, and it works on small files, but now I found most agent harnesses truncate bash tool output around 16KB, so round-tripping file reads through a bash channel breaks down on anything bigger. That's a limitation of doing this externally, implemented natively inside a harness (where reads/edits don't have to go through a size-capped channel), it shouldn't apply.

Repo (mechanics reference, not production-ready): https://github.com/Brajesh2022/VCS-edit-tools

My attempt to fix it failed because of the truncation limitations. I hope any harness builder who sees this post will apply it to a harness.

The leaked footage clearly shows Doom and Steve with the Avengers in the X-Men universe, where Doom activates the Sentinels to attack them. But this plot says Steve discovers Doom's betrayal first and the war happens later in Latveria. That doesn't add up.

....

The peoples who want to know how this works, so here's a quick overview.

This project is a web interface for AGY CLI running on your own GitHub Actions. It acts as a bridge between your browser and the CLI running in your GitHub account.

Privacy & Security

There is no database.

Your prompts, chats, files, and settings are not stored by this project because there is nothing to store them in. Everything remains in your own GitHub account and workflow environment. The project simply communicates with the AGY CLI instance running on GitHub Actions and displays the results.

How It Works

Unlike previous banned plugins tools that relied on proxies, this project runs AGY CLI directly inside a GitHub Actions virtual machine under your own account. No third-party proxy infrastructure is involved,

Current Features

• Agent mode with skills support that may give it power to browse on internet and etc...

• Skills marketplace

• Image and file attachments

• Pull request code reviews similar to Gemini Code Assist

• GitHub-native workflow integration

The project is currently private but will be open source soon.

If enough people are interested, I plan to add scheduled tasks, a safe way to provide environment variables to AGY CLI, and etc...

Would you use something like this? If you have feature requests, let me know in the comments.