Found on a sub that is explicitly made for its users to mass report the subs that get posted there. The OP really gave away the game with the "support for terrorist groups" link leading to a meme supporting Hamas.
I included a few of the comments as well as screenshots of the OP's archive links
Haven't watched it all the way through yet, but he has previous videos that I've really enjoyed. And we are once again cited as a source
How dare anyone criticize Hasan for the things he says.
And of course the only reason anyone can criticize or dislike their favorite streamer is if they're just fans of a different streamer. No one can possibly form their own opinions. Opinions can only be given to you by online personalities. So obviously everyone here just likes the wrong one
Link to the youtubedrama post about this so you can see the details from the original creator of the video in question:
https://www.reddit.com/r/youtubedrama/s/BjU9RogwVD
Basically, youtuber Jessicur made a video detailing an online stalker known as Uriel Bromberg. Uriel made multiple attempts to get the video taken down, but was unsuccessful. However, Jessicur recently discovered that the Uriel video has been removed from their channel and is now on Uriel's channel under a different title.
They were not notified of the video's removal or re-upload. They only discovered this essentially by chance.
Jessicur has contacted youtube support, but has received no help.
It is beyond unacceptable for youtube to just take someone's video and give it to someone else
Edit: This has been mentioned in the comments and I don't feel like making multiple replies saying the same thing, so I'm just going to edit it in here.
I'm not suggesting that Adam talk about Uriel. Adam deals with enough weird people obsessing over him.
If Adam were to talk about this, I would suggest that he only talk about the issue of youtube stealing someone's content and handing it over to someone else. He doesn't need to get into Uriel's backstory. Youtube doing this is a big deal and it needs attention.
I fully understand if Adam doesn't want to risk drawing that psycho's attention. I was even a little nervous about posting this here in case he finds this sub. But I do think this is an important issue
I feel kind of weird continuing to talk about Spence, especially considering they've tucked tail and ran back to their little corner of substack, but this is something I've been thinking about that I haven't seen anyone else address.
(If someone else did, I'm sorry I missed it)
Even separate from the horrible attack on Paige, and the subsequent doubling down and bad apologies, Spence's video on Jen Dent shows that they are not a credible person to get information from.
I can't speak to the accuracy of the Gabbie Hanna and Alyssa stuff. I'm not that familiar with them, so if anything Spence said about that was wrong, I wouldn't know. But once Spence starts talking about Adam, there are multiple pieces of complete misinformation.
Spence says that there was nothing sexual about Adam's grooming by Colleen. Now if I were being charitable, I would assume that what Spence *meant* to say was that Colleen was not grooming Adam for the purposes of having sex with him. But I have no reason to be so charitable, and regardless of what was meant, that's not what they said. What they said was that the grooming wasn't sexual. It was. Colleen had very inappropriate discussions about sexual topics and committed Early Porn Introduction. Spence said that the situation was so much worse than anyone (other than Adam) talks about and that they won't allow anyone to dismiss or downplay it in their comments, but they've already downplayed it themselves by dismissing a large part of it.
Spence says that Jen only spoke out on her own platform and never commented on anything of Adam's. This just isn't true. It's just not.
Spence claims that Adam's chat was telling him the truth about Alyssa when he was watching her video, but he refused to listen to them. This is false. There might have been one or two people who said something, but I don't recall seeing any chats like that and Brogan in his video said that he didn't see any. In any case, Spence paints a false picture of Adam being told the truth and shutting it down. That's not what happened.
The information on Alyssa was not nearly as readily available and immediately identifiable as Spence claimed. The videos on Alyssa's channel, Jen's channel, Leesh's channel, etc, do not make it so that just looking over the channels or at a quick search expose who she is. Even if Adam had looked it up, especially in the way people keep saying, it would have taken far longer than they claim to get to the info he would have needed. Related, Spence brings up Alyssa's twitter being full of bigotry as though that's proof that she's not a victim, but it isn't. Even the most vile and outspoken bigots can be victimized. And if we're using bigotry on social media to discredit someone's victim status, that would discredit Jen as well and I don't think Spence would be on board with that.
I don't believe that's all of the misinformation in that section, just the stuff I remember the most clearly. Even still, that is a lot to be wrong about in such a short time and it shows that Spence has no credibility even outside of this situation.
These were all either intentional lies on Spence's behalf, lies Spence was told and they repeated because they didn't bother to verify anything, or Spence was going off of memory and didn't verify anything. Regardless of what it was, it's enough to show that Spence can't be relied on to present accurate and truthful information. It also shows that Spence will present complete falsehoods to their audience with an extreme level of confidence and fully expect their audience to simply believe them without proof. Remember that Spence did not use any screenshots or clips to back up most of their claims against Adam, and the few they did use were blatantly clip chimped.
I wrote this because I've seen a lot of people talk about how they enjoyed or found value in Spence's other content. But with this video they proved that they are a dangerous person to listen to and their other content should not be trusted. Spence is at the very least willing to pass information to their audience without bothering to verify that it's correct, and they'll do so while presenting themselves as a person with authority over their audience. No one should be getting any information from them
None of this makes sense.
She thinks Adam's hated her for years because she thinks he has a file of creators who tried to discredit him against Colleen - but, even if he did, why would she be in there if she never talked about Colleen?
And her "evidence" is 1) a comment she left on a Stephanie Soo video might have been deleted, and 2) if you say you don't know who someone is, you're actually referencing Gabbie Hanna
Well. That's a pretty solid case. Such airtight evidence.
Edit:
According to some comments I've seen here and on other posts, Leesh did make a video about Colleen's "apology" video in 2020. It seems like she took Colleen's side on it at the time, and that's what she's referring to with the whole "Adam hates everyone who sided with Colleen" thing.
Okay, so first of all, if she talked about Colleen back then, and knows that she was on the wrong side of it, that makes her active refusal to learn anything about it even more questionable. Especially since she won't stfu about it now
Second, that would mean that Adam hates like 90% of drama/commentary youtube that was active at the time. Sadly, most of the internet who was aware of it sided with Colleen in 2020. Almost no one took Adam's side until years later. I just really doubt that Adam has the energy to hold all these grudges for this long. And, I'm sorry to Adam, but his memory is terrible. I really doubt he even remembers a lot of the specific channels who said anything, and especially not one that was never particularly relevant. Unless Leesh was a lot more active in the harassment/discrediting campaign than just a video, Adam likely didn't know she said anything in the first place, and certainly doesn't remember now.
Third, even if Adam does have a grudge with people who took Colleen's side back then, can anyone really blame him? These people were helping to discredit a bunch of children who were victims of heinous acts against them. Even if they had good intentions. And even if they didn't participate in the direct harassment of Adam or the other victims, they still helped to legitimize the harassment campaign by strengthening people's belief that they were defending an innocent woman and her family. It wouldn't exactly be unreasonable for him to not forgive the people who helped Colleen get away with it
OOP's comments reveal that she is also a Destiny fan (she then goes back on that and says that she doesn't watch Destiny but does align with him) and would have been a drone pilot if not for Trump banning trans people from the military.
A lot of comments are at least disagreeing with her, but 200+ upvotes (and not ratioed at the time of this post) is still pretty damning. And way too much of the disagreement still treats AOC, Bernie, Mamdani, etc., as the models the rest of the Democratic party should be emulating
I was stuck on a title for ages because there's just so much to unpack here
Turns out that AOC is super pro-Palestine and there's no proof she isn't...as long as you ignore her voting record, support for Biden and Harris, and pretty much everything except for this tweet from eight years ago