u/CaptainSure3494

They say love only when you are whole, what does anyone mean by whole, if it means you dont need anyone, then I reject the idea of being whole, when you love someone that bond is irreplaceable but if you say you don't need anyone, its only indicating that we can change partner if we will its the same shallow and temporal bonds I reject

Further, they say get married only when you are ready, how can you be ready about something you have never done before, you can not be ready for anything before that thing.

A wait, that feels so imminent, a destiny that feels so destined, a love story for generations is about to begin and two world's are finally coming together, and a our story book is finally writing its Happily Ever After

How could I explain the certainty of your coming, I await each night holding your gaze in the embrace of my eyelids which I imagine to be emerald green, shining and charming at every glance, truly God fashioned you as the most perfect of his creation in my eyes, one day very soon I will hold your hands in mine and finally the greatest Masterpiece will have its long awaited climax

I never knew I could write until I wrote until my pen became my greatest strength until I became like crimson rays filling the autumn sky, unaware and unyielding with foolish unfettered dreams, sometimes its just destiny, sometimes its that missed train sometimes its just that waking up late but every coincidence lead you exactly where you need to be, exactly where you need to be I repeat...by heart by every silent wish, exactly where you want to be

Her emerald gaze.

Her crimson, moist lips.

Her heaven-graced, rhythmic melody.

Her fainting, yet pink blush.

Her hair silky and chocolatety.

Her scent enchanted, sought by all the angels.

Her beauty, unmatched by all the maidens of heaven and Earth.

Her aura, transcendent in all its aspects.

Even the fairies of long gone times envy her very presence.

Honoured is she to be, and not lusted.

Reverend is she, and not disgraced.

The stars speak with courtesy in her respect.

The cosmos shys away when she walks forward.

In every breath, the world lies entranced by her.

In every wish, they ask for a glance of her.

She is the one.

Even heaven itself desired her.

She is the one my heart claims as his

I will be honest. Wherever I look, I see people committing sins and being proud of them, for example "Yeah I slept with this and this," "I drank whiskey the other day," etc.

And many are saying "dating should be allowed in islam" or "I dont think such and such obligations are mandatory in islam"

​

When you see such level of fitnah all around you, it really effects your iman, its very overwhelming feeling, fitnah feel attractive, Islam feels like too controlling and sins feels good, its very hard to see all such actions been performed you and not being influenced by them, it honestlys breaks my heart when I see Muslims doing sins and not regretting them, it breaks my heart to see what the Ummah has come to

The Prophet SAW said Islam came as something strange it will return to be something strange

​

I honestly struggle with this a lot, what can we do to strengthen my Imam and not let such negativity effect me

I've been thinking about a cluster of "why this and not that" questions in divine choice. Why this specific universe, out of every possible one? Why Earth, why humans as khalifa? Why is Adam the first prophet rather than starting with Noah, Moses, Jesus, or Muhammad ﷺ? Why was Noah's generation flooded but not, say, the generations under Moses or Jesus despite their own rejections? Why Muhammad ﷺ specifically as the final messenger?

​

The standard answer "because He willed it" doesn't fully satisfy me because Allah isn't constrained in His will the way we are. He's Al-Hakeem, fully aware of every possible permutation of every possible universe and every possible arrangement of prophets, peoples, and tests. So the question isn't whether He could have chosen otherwise (obviously He could), but why this particular configuration was the one actualized, out of infinite alternatives He had full knowledge of.

​

I'm asking as a young Muslim trying to understand my faith more deeply, not to challenge it. This is curiosity, not doubt. I'm trying to justify.

Hey, I am 19M, from Bangladesh, I am 5ft 3inches tall and around 54kgs, so I grew up being bullied for being short and ugly, by my friends, they always said I was ugly and made fun of me, I guess over the years I have internalised it, I suffer from speech disimpairment and stuttering, I really do not like seeing myself in the mirror, I am highly insecure about my looks, my voice, my hair and especially my height, even my ex gf, when she used to call me handsome or good looking I coudnt believe her honestly speaking, I am highly self conscious person, I have tried my best to de attach from what people say, but when the people are your own family members what can I even say, whatever self confidence I could gather will, a single command would destroy it all, I have always been a very optimistic person, I have tried my best to fix my physical insecurities whatever I could, I still feel its not enough, furthermore I also feel I will never be loved by someone forever, my ex left me for someone else so yeah

​

How could I do to overcome this internalised view myself as ugly and unlovable, and finally be happy with whose I am

How does Islam reconcile Evolution This is directly relevant to Islam because the Quran presents a specific account of human origins: Adam is created individually by Allah from clay (15:26, 38:71-72), taught the names of all things (2:31), placed in Jannah, then sent down to earth — and humanity is repeatedly addressed as Bani Adam, "Children of Adam" (7:26, 7:31, 17:70), framing him as the progenitor of mankind. The question is whether this individual-creation account can be reconciled with the genetic evidence for human evolutionary origins.

The relevant evidence: modern humans carry Neanderthal DNA, indicating interbreeding between our lineage and other hominins (Neanderthals, Denisovans, Homo erectus) — meaning Homo sapiens was not the only bipedal "human-like" population. Further back, humans and other great apes share a common ancestor (the chimp-human last common ancestor, part of the Hominini tribe), meaning our biological lineage itself emerged through gradual evolutionary processes rather than appearing de novo.

So here's the tension stated as a dilemma:

If "human" = biologically Homo sapiens, and Adam's descendants interbred with Neanderthals (non-Ruh-bearing, per this framework), then either Neanderthals were also human (in which case Adam isn't the sole father of mankind, contradicting Bani Adam), or Adam's line "degraded" by interbreeding with non-human beings.

Separately, if Adam's own biological lineage traces back through the same evolutionary chain as other primates (per common-ancestor evidence), then Adam wasn't created de novo from clay in a discontinuous sense — he had biological ancestors, and what made him "Adam" (the first human in the morally/spiritually relevant sense) was the bestowal of Ruh (the spirit/soul), not a unique biological origin.

One possible resolution: Bani Adam parallels Bani Israel — Israel (Yaqub) had ancestors and was not the first human, yet his descendants are named after him as a distinct, spiritualy/covenantally significant lineage. Similarly, Adam could be the first Ruh-bearing being — the first "human" in the Quranic/moral sense — while having biological ancestors among non-Ruh-bearing hominins, without this contradicting 2:31's account of his special instruction or his role as the first prophet/recipient of revelation.

Under this reading, "human" in the Quran is a theological category (Ruh-bearing, morally accountable, addressed by revelation) rather than strictly a biological/taxonomic one — so genetic continuity with other hominins wouldn't contradict Adam's unique status.

I'm not arguing evolution disproves Islam — I'm asking: is this Ruh-based resolution something established scholars (classical or contemporary) have actually argued, or does it run into problems with the plain reading of 15:26, 38:71-72, etc.? Are there other frameworks (e.g., among scholars who've engaged seriously with theistic evolution, like some discussions citing al-Ghazali's allegorical hermeneutics or modern voices like Mufti Taqi Usmani / Nuh Ha Mim Keller) that handle this differently?.

I believe Moral relativism and Moral Absolutism in same context and world how? For example morality and norms in 3rd millennium before christ sumeria would be vastly different then the one in relative Same period China or Indus valley civilization which means morality differs from places to places to culture to culture. Simultaneously Morality of Sumeria would differ from myceanina Greece which will itself differ in morality to celts of the north, or even to Africa Sahara same way Modern morality shouldn't be imposed over the past, who says what's right, whose morality is superior? Our Modern morality still is diverse for example in Hindu culture killing cows are seen wrong but in others place this aren't, secular society you can insult religion, in religious nation you can't, hence Moral relativism is a historical and applied idea, where as now we come to moral Absolutism I believe a person should believe in their own morals from there land and culture and time period unless they fundamentally from their core something with that sense of morality is not right, then they have absolute right to choose whatever sense of morality that feels right. But as person of a moral code with complete believe in their idea of morality they should stand by it, as person who isn't loyal to his own morality is loyal to none

Indeed, the morality must be coherent with reason if not then it's absurdity, reason is law of this world every action had a cause, and that cause serves for every reason, Reason is best of morality

I do not know why it really effects me when I see Muslims sinning publicly and they see nothing wrong with that, they further on slander anyone who tries to advice them "only God can judge" but they forget Let there be a group among you who call ˹others˺ to goodness, encourage what is good, and forbid what is evil—it is they who will be successful Quran 3:104, and further on nowadays even praying 5 times a day have become a sign of being too religious while they are unaware that they are commuting kufr by not praying

It was narrated from 'Abdullah bin Buraidah that his father said:

"The Messenger of Allah PBUH said: 'The covenant that stands between us and them is the Salah; whoever abandons it, he has committed disbelief.'"

For someone all this around me, makes me depressed and overwhelmed