I keep seeing posts about parents getting their kids labelled “gifted” by schools or organisations. Or asking how to make their children gifted, or even recalling themselves as gifted in childhood.
This study is a pretty good reality check: "Early giftedness rarely lasts into adulthood"
SpaceX just acquired Cursor for $60 billion.
I remember checking its valuation just a few months ago when it was only a couple of billion dollars.
Note that this is not even foundational model development. Though it might involve undoubtedly serious engineering, deep learning and optimization challenges.
Meanwhile, we have one of the largest developer populations in the world, but we still seem focused on service work, interview prep, SaaS clones, etc.
We clearly have talented engineers. So what's missing?
Are current AI valuations based on the belief that AGI will be achieved within the next few years?
OR
That AI won't reach AGI but will become good enough to massively increase productivity and transform many industries?
Honestly, I don't think "AI is too expensive" argument is valid, at least historically we have seen a lot of systems becoming extremely efficient over time.
Are current AI valuations based on the belief that AGI will be achieved within the next few years?
OR
That AI won't reach AGI but will become good enough to massively increase productivity and transform many industries?
Honestly, I don't think "AI is too expensive" argument is valid, at least historically we have seen a lot of systems becoming extremely efficient over time.