u/CheesecakeFew2053

I found these in the comments section of a video about white people being persecuted and attacked by black Africans in South Africa. While it is true that white people do actually face discrimination from Africans in the region, I always hate how every YouTube comment section devolves into far-right rhetoric the moment anything bad happens to Europeans.

Humans are really stupid; due to tribalism, they can never acknowledge the fact that both sides are guilty of doing bad things, including their own. Instead, they counter violence with hate speech and right-wing propaganda, which (in case they didn't realize) only emboldens Africans to hate white people even more. You are doing exactly what they want you to do by exposing your racist beliefs.

In the first pic, you have the classic far-right anti-semetic delusion that Jews started an "anti-white ideology, promote unrestricted immigration, and started radical feminism." Which is funny, because the same people complaining about feminism are also the same people who claim that immigrants from non-Western countries are backwards perverted misogynists who beat women regularly.

Regarding this point, I think it's worth highlighting that the narratives promoted by the "Jews" (or more accurately, the elite billionaires) are the exact opposite of what far-right Europeans want to think. The elite (Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, etc.) isn't promoting anti-white and pro-immigration idealogies, they're doing the exact opposite and funding far-right parties in Europe in order to contribute to the death of Western democracy and spread fascism.

There's a certain document in the Epstein files in which Jeffrey Epstein and Peter Thiel have a conversation about how they want to "return the world to tribalism." One of them even says, in fact, that Brexit was only the beginning of their plans.

Anyways, back to the topic at hand, you have these ethnonationalists in the comments promoting the usual white savior narrative that they tend to fall for. "Apartheid wasn't based on racism actually, it was designed to help the blacks!" and "we didn't steal South Africa, we saved it and gave them our wonderful Western inventions," stuff like that.

These idiots want to act like Western Europe was always the peak of human civilization, when up until a hundred or so years ago, people in London were shitting in the same rivers that they drank water from. Even the idea that washing hands is healthy for you wasn't a thing until the 1800s.

This is the usual ethnonationalist dilemma. Europeans can go to any country they want and they and their descendants deserve to stay there because it's their home, but the moment a black or vaguely Middle Eastern/Muslim population comes to Europe and settles there, all hell breaks loose and they need to immediately go back to their country (even if they were born in Europe).

I know this isn't fully abortion-related, but I thought this would be worth sharing here. I found these comments on a YouTube video from a Catholic guy who made arguments criticizing euthanasia, and almost all of said comments were in defense of euthanasia.

Maybe some people on this sub are pro-euthanasia and that's fine, but I think most of us can agree that basically threatening people who disagree with you and saying there should be no age limits on euthanasia is absurd. Really shows that these depressed nihilists don't actually value human life in the slightest.

For context, the march that the guy in the second slide is referring to is literally just a bunch of women in burqas graduating from a religious school. Said school is an Islamic madrassa. Wow, the students from a religious school are dressed in religious clothing, what a big surprise. This is what radical religion looks like, apparently.

The original post, mind you, didn't mention anything about religion, so this idiot Redditor decided to bring it up for no reason to spread dissent.

Also, the claim that you can comfortably walk around in any Western city in a religious outfit is complete bullshit, disproven by the mere existence of this Redditor's comment. Go dress up in a burqa or even a hijab and see how loving and tolerant people in certain parts of Europe and North America will be towards you.

This doesn't apply exclusively to Muslim clothing, by the way. Dress up like a Catholic nun, a priest, an Orthodox Jew, or even a Sikh in certain places (including, say, a pride parade), and chances are someone will harass you and "other" you because of how you dress. Stuff like this exists everywhere, even among the people that claim they're the most tolerant.

Obviously the post itself is filled with hot takes that I don't completely agree with, but what I find really funny is that many of the commenters decided to make this all about OP's religious beliefs, even though she never brought up religion in the original post.

Probably the funniest person is the antitheist in the second and third slides, who went on a massive rant about how reproduction is unimportant (which is nonsense) and how Christianity only grew because its followers slaughtered anyone who disagreed with them (which is not really that accurate). Not at all surprising that the person who calls Christianity a religion "built on slaughter" and whines about not "telling people how to live their lives" is an ex-Christian Southern Baptist who believes their family's faith is a "cult."

Why is it that so many antitheists always like using the words "bigot" and "medieval" whenever they debate a conservative religious person? Wait until they realize that many of society's modern moral concepts stem from those bigoted, medieval religions that they hate.

The feminism subreddit is a gold mine for stupid posts like this that generalize all religions and treat them as the worst, most misogynistic things ever created.

Frankly, even within the context of feminism, acting as if all religions are inherently misogynistic is an insult to all the religious feminists that have worked hard to improve women's rights in their respective faiths. Many of the early feminists were deeply religious; rhetoric like this is practically akin to spitting on their work.

The text in the other slides are from OP as well. Gotta love how this guy says he can get tons of "submissive Muslim girls" if he wanted to.

For context, these comments were on a video about the so-called male g-spot. The "way God intended" comment was implying that God wanted anal intercourse to be permissible because said g-spot is inside the anus (it's the prostate).

Also, can I just say that the "who created God" argument is so stupid? Like, why does God need a creator? God didn't come out of nowhere, he always existed imo

Folsom Street Fair is an annual festival in San Francisco in which people have public sex, walk around naked, and engage in weird sexual acts openly (such as sitting in piss tanks, ejaculating out of third-story windows, engaging in masochistic torture activities, and getting whipped). It's not exactly a conventional pride or LGBT rights parade, it's more about celebrating BDSM and sexual fetishes.

In 2007, they used religious iconography in a poster that was used to promote the festival. The organizers of the festival claimed that they had no pro- or anti-religious intentions behind the poster, but it still received a lot of pushback from Christians in America.

I don't know about you, but I think it's kinda offensive to use a painting associated with Christianity to promote something that is very much not Christian-like. It would be like using Christian iconography to promote an antitheist organization.

And personally, I think there's a pretty big difference between pride parades and... whatever this is. Engaging in bizarre and frankly disgusting sexual fetishes publicly is not the same as advocating for gay rights.

I know the woman in the first image is technically not an antitheist since she is pagan, but I find it very funny that she falsely claims the Quran states Muhammad married a 6-year-old, gets her claim debunked, and then responds by basically saying "lalalala I'm not listening."

God, why are these Redditors so stupid?

Btw something I've noticed recently is that antitheists seem to think that all Abrahamic religions are just monoliths, with no room for interpretation on anything. Little do they know that differences of opinion exist on virtually every morality-related matter that you can think of, among both Christians and Muslims.

For context, I found this on the AMA subreddit. The atheist guy was responding to the OP of the AMA post, who just mentioned the word "faith" in passing.

In case you're wondering, the censored photo on the last slide was that of a baby with a severe physical deformity. It's disgusting that an antitheist would use such a photo to justify their arguments.