Something about Brianna and Roger doesn’t add up…
One thing that bothers me is that Roger and Brianna ultimately decide to live at Fraser’s Ridge after having children.
Jemmy, and especially Mandy, would arguably be better suited to the 20th century, where access to education and healthcare is much better. Mandy, as a woman, would get far fewer opportunities for independent social mobility, including the ability to pursue a meaningful career.
And it’s not just about the children. Brianna is an MIT graduate and Roger is an Oxford-educated historian/professor. They both had more opportunities for growth, independence, and autonomy. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with choosing a slower-paced life at Fraser’s Ridge, but given how passionate and ambitious they were about their respective fields, I’m surprised the characters were willing to give so much of that up.
Of course, Fraser’s Ridge is where Jamie and Claire live, and it has a degree of safety. I understand why that would be appealing to them.
But I still struggle with that decision of theirs to stay behind. Why deliberately raise your children in a world with vastly fewer educational, medical, career, and social opportunities when you can give them everything in the 20th century?