The ethical duty of Cassandra?
I was thinking about Nassim Taleb’s work against the backdrop of Marco Paulas, William White, and Brookes Leeborn.
The insight Taleb brings is that human systems, almost all human systems, are unintentionally but nonetheless forcefully designed to harshly punish people who accurately see great systemic risk. To take no effective systemic actions about the predictions/insights. And, further, to never ever ever acknowledge the Casandra after it all goes horribly wrong.
That’s reality.
Now, let’s postulate for sake of argument, that those cases and that reality have absolutely nothing to do with bad actors, unethical behavior, ignorance, stupidity, or malice. That they are instead mathematical certainties derivable from the fundamental equations governing all systems financial, biological, physical. Further, because of the iron equations governing the situation there is absolutely no ability whatsoever of the people “in charge”, at any point, to change the catastrophic outcome. Let’s say, no actions of the individuals are predetermined, but the cataclysmic conclusion of the system is predetermined.
In this situation, does the Cassandra have any ethical “duty to report”? When it is clear that so doing will, because of the iron equations governing not the individuals but the system, subject the prophet (or analyst) to exile and possible destruction?