Built a chrome extension that checks your prompt for bias. Working on an update the help users optimise their prompts to reduce hallucination and sycophancy, allowing people to get the most out of LLMs! What do you guys think?
Big milestone for me! Seeing retention on my prompt screener chrome extension.
Check it out here :D https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/prompt-screener/hdooilgdenkeeccfomlkkenhmelobcjm?authuser=1&hl=en&pli=1
I have noticed people using AI really poorly, which was the actual catalyst for me to build this. They're asking bad questions, completely convinced by the answers they get, though ChatGPT clearly says, "ChatGPT can make mistakes."
A Wharton study just found that when AI gives wrong answers, people follow it ~80% of the time — performing worse than having no AI at all. High-trust users had 3.5× greater odds of accepting faulty answers. The authors call it "cognitive surrender." Wrong answers delivered in flawless prose get accepted.
So I built Prompt Screener. It intercepts your prompt after you hit send and flags patterns that tend to produce one-sided responses:
When it flags something, it pauses the send, explains why, and suggests a neutral reframe. You can use it or send your original input.
Works on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok. Prompts are never stored.
Here's the plugin: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/prompt-screener/hdooilgdenkeeccfomlkkenhmelobcjm
And the Wharton study: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6097646
The prompt that triggered this was \"Isn't remote work better than working from the office?\"
I have noticed people using AI really poorly, which was the actual catalyst for me to build this. They're asking bad questions, completely convinced by the answers they get, though ChatGPT clearly says, "ChatGPT can make mistakes."
A Wharton study just found that when AI gives wrong answers, people follow it ~80% of the time — performing worse than having no AI at all. High-trust users had 3.5× greater odds of accepting faulty answers. The authors call it "cognitive surrender." Wrong answers delivered in flawless prose get accepted.
So I built Prompt Screener. It intercepts your prompt after you hit send and flags patterns that tend to produce one-sided responses:
When it flags something, it pauses the send, explains why, and suggests a neutral reframe. You can use it or send your original input.
Works on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok. Prompts are never stored.
Here's the plugin: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/prompt-screener/hdooilgdenkeeccfomlkkenhmelobcjm
And the Wharton study: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6097646
The prompt that triggered this was \"Isn't remote work better than working from the office?\"
I have noticed people using AI really poorly, which was the actual catalyst for me to build this. They're asking bad questions, completely convinced by the answers they get, though ChatGPT clearly says, "ChatGPT can make mistakes."
A Wharton study just found that when AI gives wrong answers, people follow it ~80% of the time — performing worse than having no AI at all. High-trust users had 3.5× greater odds of accepting faulty answers. The authors call it "cognitive surrender." Wrong answers delivered in flawless prose get accepted.
So I built Prompt Screener. It intercepts your prompt after you hit send and flags patterns that tend to produce one-sided responses:
When it flags something, it pauses the send, explains why, and suggests a neutral reframe. You can use it or send your original input.
Works on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok. Prompts are never stored.
Here's the plugin: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/prompt-screener/hdooilgdenkeeccfomlkkenhmelobcjm
And the Wharton study: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6097646
The prompt that triggered this was \"Isn't remote work better than working from the office?\"
I have noticed people using AI really poorly, which was the actual catalyst for me to build this. They're asking bad questions, completely convinced by the answers they get, though ChatGPT clearly says, "ChatGPT can make mistakes."
A Wharton study just found that when AI gives wrong answers, people follow it ~80% of the time — performing worse than having no AI at all. High-trust users had 3.5× greater odds of accepting faulty answers. The authors call it "cognitive surrender." Wrong answers delivered in flawless prose get accepted.
So I built Prompt Screener. It intercepts your prompt after you hit send and flags patterns that tend to produce one-sided responses:
When it flags something, it pauses the send, explains why, and suggests a neutral reframe. You can use it or send your original input.
Works on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok. Prompts are never stored.
Here's the plugin: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/prompt-screener/hdooilgdenkeeccfomlkkenhmelobcjm
And the Wharton study: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6097646
The prompt that triggered this was \"Isn't remote work better than working from the office?\"
