Pretty simple question.
Survivor Series 2019, to me, feels like the last time WWE had a truly smarky crowd. Where the crowd was cheering for NXT over the main roster.
These days, the WWE crowd pretty content with the product. Is this because the product is better, or do the smarks who hated supercena and big dog roman just not attend WWE shows anymore?
i know people still loves to compare big dog roman to supercena, but that not makes sense especially when cena is natural born babyface. not to mention that cena got over organically on his own as heel and babyface before becoming the guy
cena and roman are both hated by hardcore fans and IWC during their babyface run, but which one of these two who you think was hated most?
i know cena was hated by the IWC during the mid-2000s - early 2010s, but they claimed that stopped watching wrestling because of him when there were a lot of wrestling alternatives like tna, roh and njpw.
wwe just put a amazing summerslam this past weekend and yet they are still trashing this even when they have great moments and matches
don’t get me wrong, i’m aware of both wwe and hhh’s recent issues creatively lately, but compared to russo, he’s terry freakin taylor
wwe got a lot of harsh negativity since wm 41 and yet aew didn’t capitalize on wwe’s problems despite their amazing product that they are putting since 2025.
don’t get me wrong, wwe deserves criticism like others wrestling companies, but IWC’s harshly constant negativity for wwe is getting overboard to the point where it’s pure and real hate.
don’t get me wrong, wwe deserves criticism like others wrestling companies, but IWC’s harshly constant negativity for wwe is getting overboard to the point where it’s pure and real hate.
i know wwe got issues for the past year, but i saw aew fans saying that aew’s product has been cooling as well with the build to forbidden door and tickets sales for all in are mid. not to mention IWC (especially in squarecircle subreddit who is 100% aew pro) are harshly and overly critical of wwe. i remember 5 years ago back in 2021 when aew got post-covid momentum even creatively especially with punk’s debut while wwe was hit/miss creatively even with their return to live crowd.
every wrestling products have peaks and valleys. shit happens all the time.
i know wwe got issues for the past year, but i saw aew fans saying that aew’s product has been cooling as well with the build to forbidden door and tickets sales for all in are mid. not to mention IWC (especially in squarecircle subreddit who is 100% aew pro) are harshly and overly critical of wwe. i remember 5 years ago back in 2021 when aew got post-covid momentum even creatively especially with punk’s debut while wwe was hit/miss creatively even with their return to live crowd.
every wrestling products have peaks and valleys. shit happens all the time.
i know wwe got issues for the past year, but i saw aew fans saying that aew’s product has been cooling as well with the build to forbidden door and tickets sales for all in are mid. i remember 5 years ago back in 2021 when aew got post-covid momentum even creatively especially with punk’s debut while wwe was hit/miss creatively even with their return to live crowd.
while tony khan regained goodwill with IWC during the past year due to aew’s creative rebuild, hhh’s reputation as booker took a drastic nosedive since elimination chamber 2025 with cena’s heel turn to the point where it’s becoming cool to hate him and make fun of him in a extremely harsh way. not to mention that they want him to be removed. no wrestling booker is perfect. every wrestling booker past and present have valleys and peaks, ups and downs, good and bad. both vince (mid 90s) and tony (2023-2024) went through that before they found the footing again. the question is: do you think hhh is horrible booker like IWC claimed to be?
while tony khan regained goodwill with IWC during the past year, hhh’s reputation as booker took a drastic nosedive since elimination chamber 2025 with cena’s heel turn to the point where it’s becoming cool to hate him and make fun of him in a extremely harsh way. not to mention that they want him to be removed. no wrestling booker is perfect. every wrestling booker past and present have valleys and peaks, ups and downs, good and bad. both vince (mid 90s) and tony (2023-2024) went through that before they found the footing again. the question is: do you think hhh is horrible booker like IWC claimed to be?
while tony khan regained goodwill with IWC during the past year, hhh’s reputation as booker took a drastic nosedive since elimination chamber 2025 with cena’s heel turn to the point where it’s becoming cool to hate him and make fun of him in a extremely harsh way. not to mention that they want him to be removed. no wrestling booker is perfect. every wrestling booker past and present have valleys and peaks, ups and downs, good and bad. both vince (mid 90s) and tony (2023-2024) went through that before they found the footing again. the question is: do you think hhh is horrible booker like IWC claimed to be?
while tony khan regained goodwill with IWC during the past year, hhh’s reputation as booker took a drastic nosedive since elimination chamber 2025 with cena’s heel turn to the point where it’s becoming cool to hate him and make fun of him in a extremely harsh way. not to mention that they want him to be removed. no wrestling booker is perfect. every wrestling booker past and present have valleys and peaks, ups and downs, good and bad. both vince (mid 90s) and tony (2023-2024) went through that before they found the footing again. the question is: do you think hhh is horrible booker like IWC claimed to be?