Trying to understand Superlink
To start off: I'm a UI fan, and this isn't meant to be a slam or anything. I just haven't paid as much attention to UI product announcements lately, so I feel like I missed the initial discussions on Superlink, and I'm trying to understand its use case and place in the market.
I'm also someone who has decades of experience in home automation and the technologies involved in that space. In both my home and work environments, I run a Unifi network with Home Assistant for automation. There's certainly a ton of folks over at r/smarthome with this kind of setup.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but the advantages of Superlink appear to be:
- low frequency for better range
- integration with the Unifi system
- ...a third thing?
My biggest issues with the available Superlink products are:
- that they seem to be surprisingly large, especially for...
- devices that appear to be running on button cells? Is that correct? I'm very surprised by the claim of 6 years of battery life when using buttons *edit: sorry, my brain was dumb and thought they were button cells but they're not
- they cost significantly more than alternative automation devices
Again, I'm not trying to bash UI here. I can see a world where these are intended to be aimed at the people/businesses who just have a Unifi ecosystem and aren't interested in going any further into the automation world than door sensors that work with Protect. If that's the justification, I'm actually good with that. I'm sure someone will create - or has created - an HA integration for Superlink products, so if those people wanted to expand their automation systems in the future, they could.
I think my biggest disappointment - from what I understand of Superlink so far - is that UI didn't use an existing protocol for their stuff. They didn't even have to use something like Thread/Matter. If they wanted low frequency hardware, they could have used ZWave. I would have gone absolutely nuts if they had used Zigbee, and added functionality into Ubiquiti Network that would assist in managing/separating channels to reduce interference (which I've already done manually on my networks). I can't help but think that they just did this proprietary thing so they could make more money. And yeah...they can do that...but I'm not going to buy it.