Smart glasses for travel, anyone found ones that don't die after 4 hours? And do people around you even accept them?

I've spent the last few months trying to dial in my setup for a month‑long trip through China, and the biggest headache has always been the charging mess in my bag. I have a pair of Meta Wayfarers but they die in like 3 to 4 hours of actual use, so I end up bringing a power bank anyway. Great for snapping photos, not so great for traveling light.

I've been looking into camera‑free alternatives with better battery life. Both Dymesty and Even Reality G2 looked promising with the 48‑hour claim, but G2 reviews sound brutal with constant connectivity drops and buggy software. Dymesty with no camera, this seems like it would make things smoother in temples and museums where people get uncomfortable around recording devices.

Has anyone actually used them on a longer trip? And did anyone give you a hard time about wearing them?

reddit.com
u/Disastrous_Effort169 — 2 days ago

Losing earbuds every month is my most expensive ADHD tax

There are a lot of aspects of my ADHD as an adult I have managed to get under control. Tracking devices on my keys, wallet and phone solved the losing problem for those. A strict calendar fixed my schedule. A running to-do list keeps everything else organized.

But nothing stops me from losing my wireless earbuds. Every single month. I would love to hold onto a pair for 6 months or more but somehow it never happens. Just a quarterly tax I have to keep paying.

update:a friend suggested I get bone conduction Bluetooth glasses, no camera. I tried his Dymesty and the sound quality was surprisingly good. I've decided to get a pair. I've lost 3 pairs of AirPods already, and for someone nearsighted like me, glasses might actually work better.

reddit.com
u/Disastrous_Effort169 — 3 days ago
▲ 4 r/augmentedreality+1 crossposts

Tried camera and camera-free smart glasses. They're solving completely different problems

Been trying out a few smart glasses recently and there seem to be two clear directions: camera glasses for capturing the world, and quieter AI glasses for just getting things done. Dymesty and Echo Frames are firmly in the second camp, Ray-Ban Meta is very much in the first.

If seamless AI assistance without pulling out your phone is the goal, audio-only or camera-free options make a lot of sense. Dymesty's 35g titanium frames are impressively light and drop the camera entirely, feeling more like premium eyewear that happens to have AI built in rather than a tech product trying to look like glasses. Echo Frames take a similar approach but center around Alexa, essentially putting an Echo on your face for timers, smart home control and playlists, with the same open-ear setup and no camera or display. Either one you can wear into a meeting or around family without raising any eyebrows.

Ray-Ban Meta is a different proposition entirely. A 12MP ultrawide camera, short video clips, livestreaming, and Meta AI that can describe what it sees or help with messages. Perfect for travel, events and social situations, but it carries a completely different privacy dynamic compared to something like Dymesty or Echo Frames, which cannot record anything at all.

If you mostly want AI in your ear without screen dependency, starting with a camera-free pair is the practical move. Test how much you actually use voice for notes, reminders and translation. If privacy and recording are not concerns for you, that is when Meta Ray-Ban starts to make more sense.

reddit.com
u/Disastrous_Effort169 — 13 days ago