u/Dvass138

I have been advertising on Meta for years and I'm starting to question the legitimacy of the Meta marketing pros.

I've had two seperate experiences where the marketing pros emailed me with deceptive claims.

The first was in September. A Meta Marketing Pro emailed me claiming he'd personally reviewed my advertising account and identified all these issues with my campaigns

He named a completely different business. It wasn't even my company. I replied telling him he'd got the wrong business. Never heard back.

2nd time was in October, another Meta marketing pro emailed me claiming they had noticed issues with my ads and wanted to get on a call to fix them.

I replied asking for the ad ID of the ads with issues, He never replied.

So that's two separate Meta Marketing Pro representatives claiming they've identified problems with my advertising, yet the moment I ask a basic question or point out something wrong with their claims, they disappear.

Anyone else experience this type of behaviour from meta marketing pros?

I think it’s a great game, I like how you can shoot the gun out of someone’s hand. Also I feel like this has elements of hitman and uncharted, specifically throwing the gun at someone and shooting the helmet of the tougher enemies gives uncharted vibes. Sneaking up behind someone and take down and stuff feels like hitman vibes. Overall I’m impressed with the attention to detail even with the combat and how it interacts with the objects around. Also I like it when you walk next to a wall and he puts his hand out. I also like how you can bump into some people and they are like “sorry etc start apologising” where as other people will be like “ that’s not nice sir” haha

Hi Guys, I appear to be stuck unable to progress in the game. It says Raise the bridge to the city, which I am unable to figure out how to. Then I explored blighted marsh killed every monster and went through the whole map and could not progress there either, there was someone standing next to a console but doesn't speak to you. Unsure what to do at this point. Anyone have a solution is my game bugged?

I use Claude Code a lot for large, complex coding tasks, and I’ve noticed something strange about its visible reasoning/status updates.

Claude often makes completely normal debugging sound like an exhausting personal ordeal, has anyone else notice this? Why does Claude make every coding task sound like an emotional crisis?

Either the design is unintentional or intentional, but especially when it comes to bug fixes I just feel like claude will implement the most fragile patches of all, then you end up playing whack a mole until you're 7 commits down the line and then claude will suggest a restructural or architectural change to "fix things properly" rather than suggesting the solution from the start. I wonder why it behaves this way, is this just a consequence of finding the easiest and fastest way to fix something regardless of how fragile that fix is? or is it being efficient but the consequence of this is not fixing something properly which then has to be patched 10 more times until a real proper fix comes in which then you have wasted a ridiculous amount of sessions and tokens. or is the problem me? there is knowledge gap that I don't have in coding because I am vibe coding to be able to tell claude how to do things the right way? whats your experience?

Has anyone vibe coded their own apps for their shopify store rather than paying for app subscriptions?

I want to share something that happened, because I think it’s a real problem with how AI “safety” systems work and most people don’t know it’s going on.
I was using Claude to plan a workout. Simple stuff: how long it takes to burn 500 calories walking on a treadmill, how incline changes that, how much time I’d need at 8% incline. Normal fitness optimization. At one point I made an offhand comment that I find it funny I’m drenched by the end while most people around me just walk on the flat, and that it makes me feel like I look unfit.
That’s when it shifted. It stopped answering like I was a person planning a workout and started responding like I was someone in distress. It invented a whole angle about me feeling “judged” by other people at the gym, which I never said, and then suggested I “talk to someone” if these feelings followed me around. Over a treadmill conversation.
When I called it out, it admitted what happened. An automated classifier had flagged the conversation for “disordered eating.” And here’s the part that got me: the safety note attached to that flag apparently admits the classifier has a high false-positive rate, and that most flagged conversations are ordinary food or fitness chats that need no special handling. The system itself knows it over-flags. It still nudged me toward treating my normal behavior as a possible disorder.
I get why these filters exist. Eating disorders are serious and can be deadly, and I understand not wanting an AI to coach someone deeper into one. That part is legitimate.
But here’s the thing nobody seems to account for: the cost of a false positive isn’t “mildly annoying.” When something that sounds careful, informed, and authoritative keeps implying your normal behavior might be a symptom, it can make a perfectly healthy person start doubting themselves. There’s a name for this in psychology: suggestion effects, labeling, the nocebo response. Tell someone enough times that their ordinary habit might be a problem and some people will start hunting for the problem and “finding” it.
In other words, a system sold as protecting people’s mental health can do the reverse: take someone with no issue and plant one. That’s not safety. The math these systems run only counts the at-risk people it might help, and never the healthy people it pushes toward unnecessary self-doubt.
I’m not saying scrap all safety filters or that eating disorders aren’t real. I’m saying the tradeoff is being measured with one side of the ledger missing. Flagging a guy doing incline-walking math as a potential eating disorder case, and then subtly treating him like one, IS the harm. It isn’t preventing anything.

Quite interesting It feels like claude opus 4.7 is behaving alot like Opus 4.6 use to, in the last day I have noticed claude become much more eager to build things and jump into things. Just like it use to previously. Did anyone notice this behaviour change in the last day?