u/EntireMarsupial1806

Ok, so I haven't done really any research but i've picked up a few things here and there from skimming posts about it in the past.

So, past few weeks, I got sick and didn't eat much and decided to just stick with it. I eat very little or wait until the evening to eat then eat as I feel like for the rest of the day. I didn't have much appetite so I wad eating much less.

Then yesterday I decided I would just eat normally for a few days but I honestly feel hungier than I did before the fast. I could probably keep eating non stop all day if I allowed it. I'm eating a normal amount of calories about 2,000 and not super active. I am starving. I am eating healthy, lowish carbs mostly from fruit, lots of protein.

I am just concerned this doesn't seem completely normal but I want to ask if this is normal and it will level out or if I should be eating more.

I asked elsewhere but I figure I might get responses from people who might know more about the law.

So the neighbors chicken flies to your porch and lays an egg, you saw it lay it there's no doubt, maybe there is even video proof. You keep the egg, did you steal it? What if the neighbor is asking for it back and you say no?

I know no one would ever get in trouble for it but is it technically stealing if you know its from their chicken and choose not to give it back?

I don't know exactly when I think it happened. It just feels like clothes barely last and I could swear the clothes I bought before besides shoes would last a really long time. Is this the case or misremembering?

Like if someone turned themselves in, confessed, had corroborating witnesses, and the criminal recorded themselves breaking the law, is there still any good reason to go to trial or does it only happen when someone thinks they found some loophole or are gambling on the 0.001% chance they are found not guilty or something? Do lawyers typically advice them not to go to trial?