Credit Card Chargeback Refused - Natwest Not Reviewed Evidence Provided
Back in June I raised a credit card dispute with NatWest regarding a £191 charge from a motorhome rental for damage (a plastic clip was broken). I have photo & video evidence showing I did not cause the damage.
I have been told they are closing the case because they never received my response providing evidence. However, one of the emails I received from them stated they couldn't accept videos as evidence, meaning they have already received part of my evidence as well as a statement of account.
The evidence I provided included the following:
Photos from check-in and check-out showing no damage.
Stills of the video
Evidence of my unanswered emails and phone calls to the company
A screenshot of the live chat stating this damage is normally covered by the additional insurance which I had purchased
Link to the insurance terms
Contact I had signed with the company I had hired from before they were sold to the new company. A new contract was never provided so all the documents are with the original hire company name.
The checkout report which I received 11 days after returning the vehicle, highlighted incorrect details. For example, the mileage stated 90k, but I received the van with 60k miles. Additionally, the report indicated 210 miles were driven upon return, but we had only driven 99 miles.
The email I received from the hire company stating they would withhold my deposit until I posted a positive review on various review sites, which I did not do.
I received an email confirming they had received my request and that a conclusion could take 45 working days.
After 50 working days, I reached out for an update and subsequently received all the evidence provided by the merchant.
I responded by showing that the photos provided by the hire company differed from mine; mine showed the wall was wood-panelled up to the corner while their photo showed a small section of wood panelling followed by a cream-coloured wall.
I had asked for time-stamped photos because the photos provided to me were unclear: they were a screenshot attached to a PDF document, occupied about 1/16 of an A4 page and were low quality and the time was just typed underneath
The link to the insurance had since been updated to exclude this damage from coverage. I pointed out that a live website that can be updated should not be used as evidence, as I never received a copy of this insurance as it stood at the time of purchase.
During the initial checkout, the staff member who checked us out took photos of the van and stated she could not see any issues. These photos have not been provided but they would show the van's status at the exact time of drop-off.
I also pointed out that if the time stamp is correct the checks were done over 24 hours later and there is no evidence I caused the damage, as it is unclear who else might have accessed the van during that time.
I had also requested a breakdown of how they arrived at this amount as the only evidence they provided to the bank was that the charge resulted from their internal estimates.
6 days after I sent all this over I called the fraud team because I saw the charge had appeared again. This happened two days before the deadline for my reply. I initially thought the hire company was charging me again, which other have reported happing to them via online reviews.
The fraud team said the case has been closed but they reopened it and added a note stating I sent over further information.
6 days after this phone call I was told the case had been closed because they did not receive any evidence from me.
Apart from asking for this to be turned into a complaint, can I do anything at this point to get my money back as I think I cannot raise this any further with Mastercard.