u/ForAfeeNotforfree

Is the Slaughter ruling on the level of significance of
Chevron? I’m a humble transactional lawyer, but it seems like a pretty big deal. From the dissent:

“Today, this Court undoes centuries of political practice and concludes that all three branches of Government have been acting in open defiance of the Constitution all this time. Its conclusion is wrong,” Sotomayor wrote in her dissent, adding, “the Court gives the President a power unknown even to the English Crown against which the Founders revolted, elevating him above his once coequal branches by transforming a duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed into a license to act in defiance of those very laws.”

They were held at a venue that: (1) did not allow phones (phones had to be put in lockers by the door, or something similar), AND (2) did not serve alcohol (thus, could theoretically stay open very late).

I absolutely fucking would, but I’m also on the older side (42). Alcohol’s a shit substance generally, but is especially poorly suited for raves, imo. And phones make almost everything about the experience inside the venue worse.

Am I just crotchety? Or is the idea for this type of venue not as crazy as it sounds?