u/Frequent_Display_592

Sunnis generally (sometimes rightly) point out the political biases and flawed methodology of Shia hadiths, while also showing some ahistorical people in Shia isnads (such as a donkey and a man coming from the sky but not sure if it is true). It is also known in western scholarship that sunni isnads are also unreliable and likely to be forged to meet the later standards. But how about the people in these isnads? Are they historical?

(AMAB, bi) I am kind of attracted to the idea of having an outercourse or activites such as spanking or getting spanked, as I said, I am not really interested anything including penetration (maybe except getting penetrated but not sure, probably just in fantasy settings). And even then, I'm mostly interested in solo activities and would even prefer it to the former things I said. I never had an experience and I am (I think) not interested in having one. Would I be still considered an allosexual since I still have an interest in non-penetrative forms of sexual activity?

In Gospels it says that Son of Man will come "after the suffering". Does that mean the apocalypse was supposed to happen after 1st Jewish-Roman war?

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14647001251341826

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001251341826

In Islamic fatwa books there are sections about how a woman should interact with her male slaves and whether they can be married or not (which isn't really seen as something... good). How did that work in practice? Did women had male slaves, if so, did marriages happen between them even when scholars didn't approve. Many things scholars didn't really approve was common around that time: pederasty, alcoholic beverages, music... Was it one of them?