Does it matter for Marxism to have a strong aesthetic?
I ask this as someone who is a very aesthetically minded person, and when trying to in my free time make a board for Marxism, realized there was a severe lack of variety in image choices, symbols, and so on comparatively to other boards I had made. When I came to writing a list of Marxist aesthetic items vs non-Marxist aesthetics, it was a lot more difficult for me to list it out beyond propaganda posters, Marxist figure heads, the hammer and sickle, and the color red.
I could try and further on why I think this is, many aesthetics can be rooted in cultural specific locations and conditions, and symbols of those cultures can be taken advantage of to produce various moods. I won't get too specific as I think I fail to make a proper explanation, but I feel like Marxism is very static and singular and doesn't branch out.
It vexes me and I am concerned with it for no reason than wanting to integrate my ideology into my own personal aesthetics.