How well does the classic SCP style work on the modern Wiki?
l've been interested in writing for the SCP Wiki for a while now, and I'm particularly drawn to the style of Series 1 and some of the earlier Series 2 material.
I'm not necessarily trying to recreate early SCPs exactly. What interests me is the relatively concise clinical presentation, combined with characters and lore that have more depth underneath the document.
I'm considering creating several anomalous characters and Foundation staff who could appear across SCP articles and Tales, with their own relationships and history, while keeping the actual SCP entries relatively straightforward.
For people who have written for or followed the SCP Wiki for a long time:
- Does this style still work well with the current community?
- What distinguishes a genuinely classic SCP from a modern article that's simply imitating the old formatting?
- Are character driven and recurring SCPs generally well received?
- How much modern SCP lore should a new writer understand before attempting something like this?
- Are there newer SCPs you'd recommend reading that achieve a similar atmosphere?
I'm still pretty much in the concept stage, so I'm mostly just trying to understand the current writing culture before I start developing anything seriously.
Anyway, thanks for reading! :)