u/GiulioVonKerman

View Poll

What is the problem in putting real European landmarks, built by real European people? Like the Colosseum, the Parthenon, Cologne's cathedral, the Eiffel tower and such?

Or even just important and revolutionary European people like Leonardo Da Vinci, Nikola Tesla, Pablo Picasso, or Copernicus?

Or maybe artworks, like the Tre Grazie, Guernica, or The Girl with a White Earring.

We need to realise that if we're really all Europeans it doesn't matter if a certain banknote has somebody from a certain country, but rather if it displays real European ingenuity.

I am not represented by a bridge that doesn't exist, or a bird, but rather by someone very smart or an artwork created by someone who lives in this continent too, even though they're not from my country.

I know it sounds crazy, but think about it: every printer company nowadays is super amti-consumer: the ink prices are stellar, software updates more often than needed, works half of the time, and refuses to print black and white if yellow is a bit low.

Prusa, on the other hand, is basically what every printer company should be: open, goes all the way with right to repair, and their machines are incredibly reliable: I often joke to my family how my Core One is more reliable than our Epson.

Furthermore they have relatively high manufacturing capacity with 3D printers, injection molds and PCB manufacturing.

I know that ink printers and 3D printers are very different, but Prusa has shown it is able to enter and compete in SLS printers, which work fundamentally differently, so I don't think it's out of the question.

This post is a bit for fun, and I don't expect them to start selling ink jets, but think about how the world would be if Prusa made ink printers...