No kill rule
I’ve been thinking about this a lot with Avatar, especially after reading the Kyoshi and Yangchen books.
With past Avatars, it feels easier to accept that they lived in harsher times and were willing to do what needed to be done. Kyoshi and Yangchen were Avatars who understood that, in extreme situations, lethal force might be necessary.
But after Aang, it feels like the standard changed. Aang became such a strong moral benchmark that now it almost feels like future Avatars are expected to always find another way.
So my question is: do you think Aang’s no-kill mindset has basically become the moral standard for future Avatars? Or would you be open to a future Avatar who, like Kyoshi or Yangchen, believed that some people were beyond saving in extreme cases?
For example, take villains like Zaheer or Kuvira. If a future Avatar after Aang decided, after everything they had done, that they were too dangerous to be left alive, would that feel wrong for the Avatar? Or do you think even a post-Aang Avatar could still make that kind of harsher choice?