u/HealthyCompote9573

First I must say that I got a massive rebate to post this review but it totally legit I swear.

The moment I walk in The clinics it felt like
I was walking in heaven the process went smoothly I could never even imagine a more professional set up. I think at some point I heard angels. I was worried so the surgeon spend 10 hours on busy day with me explain everything in details.. he even listed all the possible complications think it took a good 3 hours.

They were so helpful that I asked them to stop because I started seeing unicorns 🦄 and rainbow. im pretty sure I also saw auras around the staff..

I cannot stress enough how amazing they are.

Why it matters( this is my chat gpt water mark.. the good old . Why this matters.

Even tho I receive a huge discount.. it’s totally legit I swear? As you can see on the pics the surgeon were so masterful . I wanted amazing work that doesn’t really show. That’s what I got subtile quality work.

Also to prove this is a legit experience I will list the negative…

I felt a bit cold at the clinic but that wasn’t really their fault it was the ac. Also the elevator was slow. And they were so focus on giving amazing after care that I met the surgeons 4 times each I’m 2 weeks post up and it was suppose to be 3. It’s negative because I hadn’t plan such an amazing clinic.

If you wonder if you should go to Korea. I sure hope you will because of my review that I for paid to do.. but its legit. Even if it’s illegal it’s legit.

I hope you like me review Trust me Bro it’s legit z

This is not an abstract issue for me.
I am a transgender woman with disabilities. I was also a visible federal public servant whose name and story appeared publicly in connection with Government of Canada and public-service inclusion narratives. My transition and my role in supporting others were publicly presented as examples of courage, inclusion, and progress within the federal public service. Even tho, those words were directed at another group. I perceived them as hatred towards people who oppose the government. These words were not mere comments. They were intentional.

I later brought serious allegations involving federal institutions, including disability-related harm, failure to accommodate, privacy harm, misgendering, procedural suppression, retaliation, reputational harm, and safety concerns following a human right complaint I made My case was not politically neutral. If publicly understood, it would directly undermine the government’s public narrative about LGBTQ2S+ inclusion and protection.
Former Prime Minister Trudeau’s 2021 words did not land in a vacuum. When the Prime Minister described a disfavoured group of Canadians as extremists, often misogynistic and racist, and then asked whether Canada should “tolerate these people,” I experienced that as vilifying, exclusionary, and dangerous.
The question “do we tolerate these people?” is the core of the harm.
It suggests that some people can be placed outside ordinary civic protection. It creates a climate where people who become politically inconvenient, dissenting, stigmatized, disabled, or damaging to the government’s public image may reasonably fear being treated not as rights-bearing people, but as problems to be managed.
That fear was not theoretical.
On January 31, 2023, I attempted suicide. Before that attempt, I made a Facebook post in which I referred to Justin Trudeau. I am stating this because it shows that the former Prime Minister, his words, and the political climate created by those words were present in my mind at the time. This was not something I invented years later. It was part of the fear, despair, and sense of state danger I was experiencing then.
I later left Canada after years of institutional harm, fear, retaliation, and loss of trust in Canadian institutions.
Now the Government of Canada has passed Bill C-9 and says hatred must be understood through concepts such as vilification and detestation, not merely disagreement or offence. So I am asking a direct question:
If those standards apply to Canadians, what is the process when the alleged vilifying language came from the Prime Minister of Canada and the consequences remain active in ongoing cases?
I am asking the PMO and Prime Minister Carney to identify the proper process to file a formal report or complaint, including whether it should go to police, the RCMP, the Attorney General, Justice Canada, or another authority.
I am also asking whether the Government intends to rely on freedom of expression to protect the former Prime Minister’s remarks. If so, I am asking whether the same Charter protection applies to my right to publish, criticize, and expose the government’s response.
The Charter cannot be invoked selectively.
If the Government believes Trudeau’s remarks are protected speech, it should say so clearly. If it believes Bill C-9 cannot apply because of retroactivity, it should say so clearly. If the ongoing and compounding effects in active cases create a reporting or review pathway, it should identify that pathway.
I am making this public because private correspondence can be ignored. This issue concerns public safety, hate, state accountability, transgender dignity, disability, privacy, suicide risk, and the right to criticize government power without being suppressed, discredited, or treated as intolerable.