

GME vs SRXH short squeeze charts
Been talking to some people about the comparison between GME and SRXH shorts charts.
First image is SRXH currently, second is GME in 2021 squeeze, and third is comparing the two.
SRXH’s current reported short-interest profile is even more extreme than GameStop’s before its 2021 squeeze. GameStop peaked at approximately 109% reported short interest, while SRXH is currently reported at about 126%. That means the reported short position exceeds the number of shares outstanding, a rare situation that can increase the risk of a short squeeze if buying pressure rises.
The key difference is that high short interest alone doesn’t cause a squeeze. GameStop’s historic move also required sustained buying from retail investors, heavy options activity, and short sellers being forced to cover as the price rose. Without those catalysts, a stock can remain heavily shorted for an extended period.
If SRXH attracts significant buying demand or positive catalysts, short sellers may be forced to buy shares to close their positions, which can accelerate upward price moves. Whether that happens depends on future market activity and cannot be predicted from short-interest data alone. Thoughts?
Edit: not saying we should squeeze this. Simply asking for what others are seeing with the numbers.
Reverse Split Stories
Wanted to make a post about this since I’ve been seeing a lot of comments about “my shares only needed to go to $10 or $20 now they have to go to $500”. I also had a PT of $10, but we need to stop acting like a reverse split is a death sentence.
Going from a share price of $0.11 to $10 is still a 8,990.91% increase. Reverse splits have been done by 1 out of every 9 public companies. Having a share price at around $6 would make it easier for large corporations to invest since most of them legally at their companies can’t invest when the share price is below $1. People are saying “no company will ever touch this after a reverse split”. Take a look below at some examples of companies investing in companies with big surges after a reverse split. I understand they’re different companies, but these are just some examples because I’ve seen a lot of “this has never happened before and turned out positive.”
——
Think of DAVE.
Dave Inc. (NASDAQ: DAVE)
The Return: Surged ~2,000% in under 15 months.
The Story: Battered by the fintech selloff, neobank Dave Inc. executed a massive 1-for-32 reverse splitin January 2023 to lift its stock price from pennies to a split-adjusted $9.44. Over the next year, instead of continuing to fade, Dave achieved rapid profitability, settled key debts, and leveraged AI underwriting. By early 2024, the stock crossed $17, and as of mid-2026, it is a rare multi-bagger breakout trading over $320 per share.
Some major holders (almost entirely invested after the reverse split):
- BlackRock Inc.
- Vanguard Group
Or Sezzle.
Sezzle Inc. (NASDAQ: SEZL)
The Return: Surged ~4,700% (a 47-times run) from its post-split baseline.
The Story: Buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) lender Sezzle was written off as a dying micro-cap and forced into a 1-for-38 reverse split in 2023 to maintain listing compliance. Immediately after cleaning up its share structure, the company shocked Wall Street by shifting focus to high-margin subscription revenues and exponential net-income growth. Shares skyrocketed from roughly $4 to over $187.
Some major holders (almost entirely invested after the reverse split) :
- BlackRock Inc.
- Divisadero Street Capital Management
- Morgan Stanley
- Bank of America
——
Everybody is freaking out and acting like a reverse split has never happened before. I’m bummed too but we can’t sell or buy or anything right now other than wait to see what happens. Companies before this have seen positive growth after a reverse split. We can’t do anything right now during the halt. Best we can do is research and learn. Can’t do much else while we wait.
Eric if you’re reading this… pls do some marketing soon
I know that lots of us think he can’t talk just yet and there’s a lot of theories flying around.
I did some digging into some competitors and their marketing. SRx/EMJX isn’t spending any money on promotional ads, but others like MicroStrategy (now just “Strategy”, ticket MSTR), Bitmanor (BMNR), and others are running advertising on Google, X, Reddit, and LinkedIn.
Have any of you ever seen an advertisement while scrolling on Reddit and it says “promoted”? Or have you ever looked up a pair of shoes on Google and images come up that say “sponsored”? This is what I’m referring to. On Reddit and X specifically, you can target audiences based on topics and interests (pennystocks, investing, etc.) and they’re the two cheapest platforms to do advertising on.
Eric, if you’re seeing this, pls look into this type of advertising… (eventually)
Photo Explanations -
Photo 1 is of some MicroStrategy (MSTR) ads on Google that users see if they search “Gen 2 Treasury”. Although it is Gen 1, the company is being smart by bidding on “keywords” to show up for anybody searching Gen 1 or Gen 2 treasuries.
Photo 2 is just proof that SRx/EMJX/SRXH isn’t doing anything currently.
Photo 3 is an example of an advertisement on X.
Sister Mary Bernard
Rewatching and forgot about the nun LOL… she boils my blood. She’s honestly one of my least favorite characters 😭😂
Share Price
To the person that posted this in SRXH/EMJX instead of SAFX… explain? 😅 does this mean share price would be below or above $0.10? Or no way to tell?
Clarity Act Discussion
Jbk2221 and I were talking about this so thought I would put it here in case others had any opinions. I used AI to clean it up… but double checked everything and the sources. Links taken out because I tried to post this but some of the URL’s are against Reddit guidelines so the post got removed… not sure which ones.
Bottom line, Enacting the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act) would be highly beneficial because it replaces years of unpredictable "regulation by enforcement" with a codified, predictable legal framework. For a multi-asset corporate treasury platform like EMJX, having an explicit law in place could accelerate its business model within just a few months by removing the compliance fears that currently stop non-crypto corporations from holding or actively trading digital assets. Once passed, this defined legal safety net would allow EMJX to immediately scale and sell its AI-driven risk-management software to a newly unlocked enterprise customer base that requires strict regulatory guardrails. Also a lot of financial institutions have fiscal years ending at the end of August or September… curious if they would incorporate this into new budgets beginning in the early Fall months. They’re pushing for it to be done by the week of Fourth of July and it’s on the Senate’s calendar. If passed it would go straight to the president for signature. Makes me think about waiting after the initial merger spike until July to hear back about the bill status and if companies sign on in a month or so.
Here’s some bullets :
Direct Validation of the "Gen2 Treasury" B2B Model :
- The Product: EMJX does not just manage its own balance sheet; its core business model includes selling its Gen2 Treasury Operating System to other corporations holding digital assets.
- The CLARITY Benefit: Historically, non-crypto corporations have stayed away from adding digital assets to their treasuries due to severe regulatory ambiguity. By establishing clear, legal definitions for multi-asset corporate portfolios, the bill effectively de-risks the asset class for mainstream businesses. This expands EMJX's potential B2B addressable market, making it easier to sell its risk-management software to corporate treasury boards.
—
Regulatory Clarity for Alts and Multi-Asset Portfolios :
- The Edge: Unlike "Gen1" corporate treasuries that only buy and hold Bitcoin (e.g., MicroStrategy), Eric Jackson’s EMJX strategy actively trades a multi-asset portfolio including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and smaller altcoins.
- The CLARITY Benefit: The bill formally divides digital assets into payment stablecoins, digital commodities, and investment contracts, defining the boundaries between SEC and CFTC jurisdictions. This eliminates the legal threat of sudden "regulation by enforcement" actions against the specific altcoins EMJX actively hedges and holds.
—
Institutional Capital Inflows and Valuation Expansion :
- The Capital: Micro-cap and recently merged companies like EMJX rely on liquidity and institutional interest to scale.
- The CLARITY Benefit: Clear regulatory baselines act as a green light for traditional Wall Street funds and institutional allocators who are legally restricted from investing in gray-area asset classes. Legal clarity traditionally commands a valuation premium, potentially driving up public market multiples (P/E ratios) for compliant digital asset infrastructure plays.
—
Clear Tax and Compliance Rules for Active Hedging :
- The Tech: EMJX uses machine learning to actively hedge market cycles rather than sitting on a passive balance sheet.
- The CLARITY Benefit: The accompanying framework standardizes accounting, tax rules (such as wash sales), and compliance expectations. Operating as a public entity under defined, statutory safe harbors ensures EMJX can optimize its automated trading algorithms without fear of retrospective regulatory penalties.
OPEN and EMJX Question
I’ve seen so many people post today about pivoting to OPEN now that SPCE is dying off. I haven’t seen any reasoning behind them pivoting, just pumping. Maybe they’re just trying to find the next big thing but … anybody know why people are so obsessed with OPEN today?
Trying to do my own DD and I know people love the CEO Kaz but most of the posts are just “BUY OPEN!!!”
EMJX / SPCE
Wish people hyped up SRXH/EMJX as much as they hyped up SPCE 😔
(No I don’t want this to be a pump and dump, lol)