BL doesn't have to be physical in anyway to be classed as a BL and people seem to forgetting that and it's just sad - Soulmates (2026)
Honestly recent discussion around 'Soulmates' has really just upset me, and people who call this show a bromance just because they don't put a label on their relationship is just ridiculous. This was a show about two men in love simple as that. It wasn't a bromance. To call it that is just disrespecting the craft that was this show. I can't even enjoy it because I'm being swallowed by people mislabelled it.
It really shows what kind of bl fan you are, when you completely mislabel something so obviously queer just because there isn't any kiss scene/ NC scene. Not all stories will have a happily ever after. Not all stories centred on queer love will have an established relationship, that doesn't necessarily mean that these characters aren't in love. This isn't queer baiting. To disregard this show because of some ridiculous standard of 'there was no kiss' or 'they didn't label their relationship' is just ridiculous. I've seen people say that they even got emotional and even cried at the ending but it wasn't a bl. Did we watch the same show? This was not queer baiting. This wasn't a bromance. This was bl. This was a queer love story. It was a tragic tale of two men in love that didn't get their happily ever after.
"I found someone I care about, i found someone I want to protect and cherish more then anything, I just want to make him happy" - HE IS TALKING ABOUT RYU!! I've seen people use this scene as a defence of them no loving eachother but please it is so obvious who he is talking about.
"If you are really here right now, I think i wanna live a little longer" - Johan found acceptance in his decision and his fate, but seeing Ryu again made him want to live longer. I also was angry in Johans decision but I understood why he made that choice, as I feel Ryu does. I wouldn't want to spend our remaining moments in anger even if in my heart I would be angry at all the years we've missed because of that decision.
"I didn't want YOU to see me like this" Johan to Ryu in the mud scene and then we follow this with that hug, then he asks him to come live with him in Japan. Then we get that shot of Sua just watching them in the distance, please what more do people need.
He kept Johans drawing. He framed it. HE FRAMED IT. Just as Johan is leaving the camera shows a shot of him staring at it.
They sign the marriage certificate for Sumiko and Seiichi, Sumiko asks Johan to "take care of Ryu". Johan leaves the apartment "take care of Ryu" he says to Sumiko. I feel like both Sua and Sumiko knew what they had, and they gave both boys the space to figure it out. It was up to them and its THEIR timeline. I think the boys had sm going on that solidifying their relationship wasn't a priority to them, they knew what they felt, they knew that they felt comfortable in it, and it really is their own timeline. But sometimes things come up that mess with that, its the reality of life really. Life is short, you don't know how long you have eachother. Doesn't mean that they didn't love eachother.
Their love was so transparent, someone online described the show as watching your friends. I feel like that description fit this show so well, it felt like watching strangers live their lives and I felt blessed I got to witness it. I felt attached to all the characters and I really didn't want to come on here and defend the show because why is this even a discussion atp. It's just upsetting that under each edit you'll see people commenting "bromance" "not bl". BL isn't bl just because there is smut okay, its a story centred on a love between a man and a man. This was that plain and simple, you may not have liked it but that doesn't mean you can mislabel it into something it so obviously isn't. A lack of media literacy will truly be the death of cinema because how could people have missed something so obvious.