Most 'GEO experts' are just SEO consultants who changed their LinkedIn bio
I've been watching the GEO discourse explode over the last few months and honestly most of it is embarrassing. Half the people selling "Generative Engine Optimization" services right now are just repackaging a content quality checklist they had in 2019.
The tells are always the same. Their GEO audit looks exactly like an SEO content audit. They talk about E-E-A-T, structured data, clear headings. All fine things. All things that have been best practice for years. The GEO rebrand is doing a lot of heavy lifting.
What actually seems to matter for LLM visibility is genuinely different and almost nobody talks about it. LLMs don't rank pages, they pull passages. So the unit of value is a specific claim or explanation, not a URL. Content that gets cited tends to have an identifiable source behind a concrete position. Wishy-washy balanced takes almost never get pulled. Opinionated content from a named entity with a track record does.
The other thing worth knowing: your Google ranking and your LLM visibility are not the same thing. I have clients with pages sitting at position 6 on Google that Perplexity cites constantly, and position 1 pages that never show up in AI answers. There is something else going on and it is not schema markup.
GEO is real and worth paying attention to. But if someone is selling you a GEO strategy that looks identical to the SEO work you were already doing, you are paying for a LinkedIn bio update, not a strategy.