u/Interesting-Peas

I only have like one way to describe it and that's with like a written paragraph.

"Galen, with a voice of serinity that makes people feel unnatural levels of calmness."

I imagine it could work like a call from like a siren or something. I don't know if it already exists.

I have this idea of this character named Galen with a voice of serinity, and maybe this voice makes people just see him as a form of stress relive/ someone who can like mend their worries.

I think people might rely on him because like feeling that unnatural level of calmness could like make them addicted to it if that makes any sense?

But i don't know what even unnatural levels of calmness would do to a person.

Could they fall asleep? Could they just like freeze?

I don't how like the calm status effect of this power could work.

Okay so i just wanted to post something here, so recently i posted this on r/antiai:

You know what attitude i will have towards ai? I will just pretend it doesn't exist as it is just a headache to even think about.

I will try to stay away from that ai cesspit all together if i can.

I do want people to have more accessibility to art but ai is not the way to go as you're not really doing the art, it's just a machine that's doing it.

And in my eyes, something a machine does will never compare to an actual human doing the thing.

Because, Ai doesn't have an human experience, it didn't struggle or learn or have moments where it struggled to even keep going.

Because it doesn't have emotions or a brain, and pretending like ai can replace humans isn't the way to go.

Like i just don't like it, that should be the end of the story.

My opinion should not be unpopular or controversial.

I literally do not care for any sort of art revolving ai because ai does the entire work.

That's why i hate it and don't mess with it. Like it's just dumb to use it in any case.

I would rather you watch a show in your free time or a book if you don't have time for art, because then you'll actually be doing something that benefits art in some way.

But using ai and then calling That's just lazy. Like i literally do not care for any sort of art revolving ai because ai does the entire work.

That's why i hate it and don't mess with it. Like it's just dumb to use it in any case. Ai "art" doesn't interests me because i want the entire process not just the result. I don't want the art i view to be made entirely by a machine.

Because i want people who have experienced this life and have felt something instaed of a souless machine.

Mind you this goes for any creative field.

The bottom line will always be that i want to support real human beings that actually do the whole process in any art piece and don't use ai.

Because i just don't want to support an ai that does the entire process by just making a result.

Is that such a hot take to have? Probably not.

But i have been telling myself it's a hot take because there are reasons as to why people can't make art. While i do wish art was more accessible to everyone, i don't want them to rely on ai to make a finished product.

I would rather them support people that have the time and actually do art then use a souless machine just for an result.

Like the thought of using ai to just get a result quickly is just icky to me.

I am sure there are people that have incredible ideas, but i don't want to support them knowing ai does most of the process.

I would rather not support people that use ai even if art is inaccessible to them because i don't want to support ai.

That's the thing that's driving me crazy because why can't people understand that i do not find the works of a machine appealing when an human is right there?

Like maybe it's just me but even if Ai were to be ethical, in that context if it still does all of the work i would still not support it.

Because this whole situation just has like shown me why human made art is important and i just don't want to rely on a machine in any creative filed like i want life, i want a human making the art.

To explain my feelings, let's just say there was a brush that could paint images and get a result by itself when someone touched it.

Would that tool make the person who touched it an artist? No, because an image or a result is not what art is about.

Art is about the human artist that takes part of the process and adds their own flair. That art comes from them and nothing else, they make their own unique mark in the world that comes from them with every piece.

And that's what i am there for, not an finished result. I want the entire process.

And if that is like a selfish and privileged mindset to have then sue me that i have standards.

Look, i don't care if a person is like a good story teller or funny.

If they use ai i won't support them.

There are countless of artists that they could reach to for free, there are literally volunteers that do art for free.

There are sites they can use that people can donate to so that they can pay a real artist to bring their ideas to live.

Like i am just going to stand my ground and say that i don't mess with any ai being used in a creative field that does most of the work for them.

Like i hate this type of ai with a passion.

Now on in the current i could have worded that better but, all i wanted to say is this.

I can't support ai in any space or form because i want like a person behind every creative field i see.

Look, looking into like anti ai posts like reminded me and brought back my life for arts.

Because i would be lying if i said i didn't use ai in the past.

But looking and researching on this topic, i just am tired of ai man, like i am sorry but i just personally cannot support someone using ai in the creative fields.

Like i am so tired of ai in general, like why do we have to rely on souless machines if we can do things ourselves?

I honestly just want to forget ai ever happened in the first place and go back to like 2010's or 2017.

Look, what i am saying is that i want to support breathing humans that are alive right now the same time as me.

But i got hate for my opinion.

Some people said:

"Right. We are back to 2003 blaming people for not recycling when corporations are the biggest polluters."

And another replied with:

"Right. We are back to 2003 blaming people for not recycling when corporations are the biggest polluters."

And i am just so done and over with like these people man. Like look, ai is just a souless machine, so why are people crying over my opinion on it?

It doesn't feel feelings, it just repeats things and doesn't evolve. It just can't learn, it hasn't lived a human live and it will never live a human life because it's just synthetic coding.

I do not value codes over humans, that is my take. If you have a problem with it fine, that won't stop me from not using ever even if it was ethical because i am tired of machines trying to do everything for us.

If that isn't inclusive and mindfull then i don't give a damn.

Some ai bros will really sit there and act like ai generated images are art.

I know there are people that are literally paralyzed and cannot use any limbs.

And i must say that if being anti ai means that i am ablelist then so be it.

I would rather disabled people watch indie animated shows on YouTube then have them waste hour on prompting souless ai generated images.

Like do we really need to make artists life harder just because some people don't want to make effort?

Art is not supposed to be easy and it's supposed to be trials and error. You're there for the process and not the result.

And even if there was an ethical AI made right now, i would still not support it because frankly i would rather pretend like AI doesn't exist and it's a thing we all left behind in 2025.

And i promise to myself that i will only support organic art made by something with organs and a brain rather than an souless synthetic ai.

Do i need a reason to be against something? I would say no.

Look my intent wasn't to bring someone down, it was to offer constructive criticism.

I saw this fanart, everything to the colors and shadows were great but the proportion were a bit odd.

So i went and replied with 'The drawing is great, but his body should have been bigger or the head should have been smaller.'

But then they replied with 'Afraid we don't remember asking you?? Plus, that's pretty rude.'

Was i being rude?