u/InterviewOther6417

Tamo todo loco?

Del mi secundario hace decada y pico:

A un pibe le decian el mugre y al amigo el mosca (porque andaba siempre detras del mugre)

Había una piba oriunda del Chaco que no era muy agraciada y le empezaron a decir "el impenetrable". La familia hizo un quilombo barbaro pero quedó por lo bajo

Eso . Estoy bastante endeudado y sin posibilidad de pagar ni para caretear. Leí que había un tope del 50% sobre la deuda original pero también leí que lo sacaron?? O es un proyecto? No encuentro información clara

This is a movie for people who haven't read The Odyssey.

I have a university degree, I reread the poem at least twice a year, and I regularly revisit other ancient epics such as the Argonautica and the Thebaid. From that perspective, this isn't even an adaptation. It feels like a three-hour AI-generated movie that recycles the stereotypical versions of a few scenes while quirurgically cutting geverything that actually matters in the poem.

The central themes are gone. The great speeches are gone. The character development is gone. There isn't a single memorable quotation from the text. No inteligence, not growth for Telemachus, even the cyclop scene is a good terror short but there's ANY of the messages of that episode. Everything that makes *The Odyssey* one of the foundational works of Western literature is almost entirely absent.

I have no doubt that Nolan neither reread nor seriously studied the poem. The result is an empty and, at times, boring film that somehow turns *The Odyssey* into an almost entirely original story wearing the poem's name. Even that netflix troyan series achieve, better o worst, some of the central topics.

The only genuinely good was the five-minute fall of troy sequvence. Ironically, it's the best part of the movie—and it isn't even in the poem.

I highly recommend *The Return* (2024) instead. It's a thoughtful and deeply moving Aristotelian tragedy that captures the spirit of the original work in a way that recalls the great tragic poets of antiquity (and like them, is a adaptation, one possible perspective of a specific episode). Gods are absent in The Return but in the same way as they are on Séneca's tragedies. Even the Odyssey (not so the Illiad) in some way allows to reeplace the gods with the background idea that they represent. The entire poem is a PRAGMATIC live-guide for the people of the cities on the bronze-age.

Nolans film, As a movie it a 7/10, interesting for moments and in some ideas. But any of that ideas come from the Odyssey. Its a original work dressed up with the stereotype of the Odyssey. Ulyses of Joyce is the reverse mechanism, for give an idea of what i talk.

This is a movie for people who haven't read The Odyssey.

I have a university degree, I reread the poem at least twice a year, and I regularly revisit other ancient epics such as the Argonautica and the Thebaid. From that perspective, this isn't even an adaptation. It feels like a three-hour AI-generated movie that recycles the stereotypical versions of a few scenes while arbitrarily cutting out everything that actually matters in the poem.

The central themes are gone. The great speeches are gone. The character development is gone. There isn't a single memorable quotation from the text. Everything that makes *The Odyssey* one of the foundational works of Western literature is almost entirely absent.

I have no doubt that Nolan neither reread nor seriously studied the poem. The result is an empty and, at times, boring film that somehow turns *The Odyssey* into an almost entirely original story wearing the poem's name.

The only genuinely profound scene was the five-minute battle sequence. Ironically, it's the best part of the movie—and it isn't even in the poem.

I highly recommend *The Return* (2024) instead. It's a thoughtful and deeply moving Aristotelian tragedy that captures the spirit of the original work in a way that recalls the great tragic poets of antiquity.